| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> if your running hardware raid on a dell box then all your'll see on centos is a message in the logs saying disk failure
<1> you should be running the dell OMSA stuff
<2> there all a bunch of windows users at that place blaming Linux for this...
<2> Iv ran all the dell stuff
<2> they said the discs look fine... there asking me to power downand check nothing has came loose during the move.
<2> all green etc. Wat file system checks should i do?
<1> fsck your /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 & LogVol01
<2> I cant do that on the system when its booted?
<1> i take digicam photos of error message screens before i power machines off that are uncooperative.
<2> i need to remount it read only?
<1> it would have been helpful to note which ext3 filesystem was having errors
<2> overseer: I couldnt do that :( they rebooted it.
<1> and they blame you... :)
<3> i want to protect two different subdirectories in htdocs, i am using .htaccess p***word authenticatio, now my problem is that, if i put .htaccess in one subdirectory it works fine but if i put .htacess file in both sub directories it stop working, while i am using single .htp***word file to protect both directories?
<1> ya, i'd bring it down to single user mode and run the fscks
<2> Well not me they are blaming linux, which is more anoyying tbh overseer
<2> overseer: is there any checks i can do now while its booted?
<4> tell them to not blame the tools.
<4> that it's your fault
<2> lol.
<4> and you'll commit seppuku after you find them a worthy replacement.
<1> one sec
<5> nayyares: "stop working" usually involves some error messages. :) Maybe AllowOverride is not set for nd directory?
<2> Evolution: not really my fault + they have not backed this up even tho iv told them to 100 X
<2> no backup system at all...
<6> k31th: there are only two types of users. Those who have already lost their data and those who will loose it.
<1> give me the one line that starts VolGroup00 from the command 'vgs -o +vg_free_count,vg_extent_count'
<7> does CentOS's version numbering resemble the RH numbering?
<8> snowboarder04: 4.4 is rhel 4 update 4. 4.3 is rhel 4 update 3. got it ?
<9> Yes. But the U was to big, so we replaced it with a very small .
<1> k31th: any free space in your volume group? see 'vgs' command above
<7> cheers low :)
<2> VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree Free #Ext
<2> VolGroup00 1 3 0 wz--n- 409.75G 32.00M 1 13112
<2> overseer: ^^
<3> minri, no, "stop working" i used for p***word protection, mean it stop asking p***word for both subdirectories.
<8> Evolution: yes ? :)
<4> low: nothing. just thought you looked like you could use some abuse
<9> nayyares: Well, as soon as you are authentificated it won't ask again for the same realm.
<1> k31th: ok, no, you can't do any fsck'ing now - you have to unmount or go R/O -- if you had free space in the VG you could snapshot and check the snap
<2> there is only 32mb free?
<3> minri, AllowOverride is set to AuthConfig
<1> k31th: yes
<2> on the disk
<2> inside the container its fine
<2> was worried then
<10> anyone can tell me which kernel is in the diskboot.img on cent os 4.4? it seems that they not find my network card... :(
<1> k31th: the volume group
<2> ah
<2> overseer: so.
<3> range, they are two different subdirectories, on same level, i suppose that it will never ask again for child directories.
<2> is there instructions on centos site for dropping it to single user and doing the checks
<9> nayyares: And it won't ask for the same realm, if you are already authenticated (and didn't restart the browser or the webserver).
<1> k31th: 'telinit 1' should be a start, 'umount /' might be next
<10> is the RTL-8169 Ethernet Adapter not supportet via the diskboot.img?
<3> range, two different .htaccess files can point to single .htp***wd file ? with same username?
<11> M0ppi: the image is a full 2.6.9-42.EL initrd
<2> overseer: I see. cqan i not use the recovery cd?
<11> I am not sure if it works with that adapter or not
<2> and do it from there?
<10> hughesjr: seems that he not support the RTL-8169
<1> k31th: you can use whatever you wish. recovery cd included.
<10> hughesjr: replacing the initrd.img with a actualized version should not work?
<3> hughesjr, evening
<11> M0ppi: well ... the initrd is special ... in that it has other things too
<11> but it was built on the -42.EL kernel ... was that added later
<11> (support for that card, that is)
<10> hughesjr: please get me a hint where i can find out if this card is supportet
<9> nayyares: I am talking about Authentification Realms.
<10> hughesjr: can i fetch a newer version of the diskboot.img?
<11> M0ppi: that is the newest one we have built
<10> hughesjr: a fedora diskboot.img should not work or? the problem is that i had realized now in the moment that my card is not supportet and i had no time to test another one
<10> hughesjr: the summary is that i cant install centos on this machine?
<12> The diskboot images are tied to the rest of the install process.
<4> M0ppi: no. a fedora disk will not work.
<3> range, no i just want to know that i have to create two seperate htp***wd for two different htaccess or single htp***wd will work for both
<10> sh*t
<2> how do i fsck a logical volume ?
<4> k31th: with fsck
<9> nayyares: A single one will work. And this is *really* offtopic in here.
<10> k31th: shutdown -Frn now
<13> k31th: mount will give you its device name if mounted
<10> Evolution: so fedora core is my solution
<2> M0ppi: ?
<4> M0ppi: don't be a jack*** (about the shutdown), and I have no idea what your solution is.
<4> YOU get to make that call, as it's your computer.
<14> hi, what should I consider to make the partitions settings in a new centOS installation?
<4> M0ppi: I fail to see how a missing ethernet adapter driver keeps you from installing.
<10> k31th: if you use the volume on runtime it is a safe solution to check it on the next boot
<4> josue_m: drive space and the job of the machine.
<4> k31th: ignore M0ppi. he's clearly lost his mind.
<10> Evolution: hey
<14> ias there any article/guide around there to know more about linux partitions?
<4> josue_m: yes. there are several on google, and in the centos install documentation on centos.org
<11> M0ppi: I just looked at the kernel changelog ... I don't see anything adding support for any RTL cards between 2.6.9-42 and 2.6.9-42.0.3
<14> ok, thanks
<4> M0ppi: if you're going to give idiotic advice, then the point stands.
<15> "the gnome calendar" is now evolution?
<4> you can very easily force an fsck without an unclean shutdown.
<4> all it takes is a touch command in /
<9> R8169 is in the kernel as a module.
<9> So I really don't know where the problem is.
<2> wats a quick way to find out if a box is running 64bit ?
<2> or 32bit centos
<16> uname -
<2> i thought uname
<10> range: my problem is that my modificated diskboot.img will not work on a specific machine but my test machine here it works fine
<2> 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp
<2> 32?
<4> k31th: uname -a
<16> uname -a
<9> Hmmmm. Modifications ...
<4> M0ppi: how did you modify the diskboot.img?
<9> Dows the original work?
<10> Evolution: only the first label i add => append initrd=initrd.img ramdisk_size=9216 ks=http://development.mx-solutions.de/ks.cfg console=ttyS0,57600
<2> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 // cheers Evolution
<2> what cd do i want for recovery?
<10> Evolution: the image work but not with my ks options
<4> M0ppi: then your ks options are wrong.
<10> Evolution: on every machine i had tested it works
<4> that's not an image problem.
<4> M0ppi: you appear to be confusing the issue.
<4> M0ppi: does the ethernet module load and function?
<10> Evolution: i can't check i had only serial console
<17> \q
<4> M0ppi: then find another way to test. because right now, there is no problem.
<4> M0ppi: you say that it works, just not with your kickstart script.
<4> that's not a driver/module problem yet, so you need to find another way to demonstrate the error.
<10> it works with the ks cfg on others machine well i had testet much as i can
<4> M0ppi: a kernel module has NOTHING to do with your kickstart
<4> does the module load and function on a normal install method? without the kickstart file?
<10> Evolution: yes, but i wonder why they not do the dhcp process and fetch the ks file
<10> Evolution: i will try
<4> M0ppi: that's the second layer to troubleshoot. do one thing at a time.
<10> Evolution: ok, i take a look on the startup
<4> if the module works, then you move to dhcp, which may be that the dhcp server is not properly identifying on the network.
<4> it could be any number of thing.s
<18> guys, best way to install yum?
<10> Evolution: sorry, but i cant find output from the card, can you take a look please? http://rafb.net/p/Kp1SW246.html
<4> sparkie: it comes pre-installed on centos.
<18> not when my isp removes it :p
<18> [root@michaeleaton ~]# yum
<18> -bash: yum: command not found
<4> sparkie: then you need to ask your isp how to add it back in, as they have removed it for a reason.
<4> using our software with whatever custom hacks they've made could break things for you.
<10> Evolution: no card seems to be identified
<10> the one which i can identify is NET: Registered protocol family 2 but this is not related to hardware
<4> M0ppi: what's your point?
<10> Evolution: that the module not load on startup
Return to
#centos
or
Go to some related
logs:
#physics
#openzaurus
3d acceleration ati radeon r250 lf firegl 9000
easysource lmms
debian running BDB recovery, slapd - failed
#suse
$sftp->do_opendir
Sarge Install sata-CDRom
make: ***[libphp5.la]Error 1 cannot fine lltdl
88w8385 netbsd
|
|