@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



Comments:

<0> RHEL4
<1> MACscr: there are no repos for RHEL4. unless you make your own.
<1> or you're talking about 3rd party ones.
<0> all i need to do is install php-gd =P
<0> but i guess i can use centos4 ones
<1> MACscr: wtf?
<1> NO
<1> don't do that.
<0> doh
<2> centos4 ? are you working on centos3 /
<1> if it's a RHEL box, use the RHEL rpms, or else you'll screw over the support.
<0> no, the system is RHEL4
<2> then whats wrong with the rhel4 rpm's ?
<0> its an ev1 server, there isnt any support =P
<3> pirate ware?
<0> no, its not pirate, heck no



<1> MACscr: remove the sources line I gave you earlier, and do 'up2date -i php-gd'
<1> MACscr: then you've likely got web support at least.
<4> ok better
<4> Evolution, do you know if the job is closer to Chapel Hill or Raleigh
<0> they wouldnt even help him get yum working
<0> but i guess its worthless anyway
<1> MACscr: it's rhel4, and that's not provided, why should they?
<0> all my boxes are centos
<2> MACscr: there is no yum in rhel4.
<1> MACscr: your sanity needs to be reviewed.
<1> smooge: It's at RTI in RTP. that's all I know.
<1> I think it's closer to Raleigh though.
<4> which RTI?
<0> evolution: it said the packages i requested were marked to be skipped over
<1> MACscr: then they're marked for a reason. like the box has custom php installed via cpanel etc.
<1> MACscr: sidestepping that with yum will only screw things up worse.
<0> ok, this is turning into a nightmare
<1> smooge: science and engineering, if that helps at all.
<1> I honestly don't know which building on the RTP campus it is.
<1> I've never been there.
<4> Evolution, I meant as in what does RTI mean :)
<1> a Research Triangle Institute. (http://www.rti.org)
<1> s/a/ah/g
<4> Ok cool I remember them
<4> I was looking to work for them a long time back.
<4> RTI is smack in the middle.
<4> You can get there pretty slowly from any of the places. I remember apartments not too far from there that were 6 month lease types.
<4> Nothing to write home about, but cheaper than living in Chapel Hill. What are you looking for in an apartment
<0> ok, weird, the GD library is installed according to WHM, but its not showing up on phpinfo()
<5> php isn't compiled with gd to enable a separate php-gd package
<6> smooge: ha we have a Chapel Hill upscale apartment complex by the mall in Salina, KS
<0> fedoraed: yum install php-gd works fine all all my centos boxes, all i have to do is restart apache and im set
<0> what am i missing on this RHEL4 box
<7> according to WHM?
<7> uh huh....
<0> according and then the fact that up2date is blocking me installing it. So i figured there must be a reason
<5> MACscr: rpm -q php-gd
<0> php-gd-4.3.9-3.15
<0> thats not the current version of php though, coudl that be the reason?
<1> MACscr: that's perfectly current
<0> i mean thats not the version of php that is running on the system
<0> its running php4.4.3
<1> MACscr: remember back when I told you that it was excluded from up2date for a reason?
<1> this is that reason.
<1> MACscr: you need to learn a little about how the system is set up before you break it beyond fixability
<1> seriously. stop.
<0> i have installed anything besides yum though
<1> take a step back, breath. then sit down and walk through the system
<0> woops, havent
<1> quit looking for ways to get what you want on then, and take inventory of what you currently have.
<1> er s/then/there
<0> Ok, so i guess were at the phase were php-gd is installed, its just not functional
<1> MACscr: the fact that it's got php 4.4.3 means you need to look at HOW that was installed.
<1> they're not using RHEL/centos packages, so it's likely a source build.
<1> that means you'll have to recompile php to get gd support on there
<1> which means you'll want to know what php functions it was built with, so you don't leave anything out.
<1> all of which is OT for here, since it's a custom build.
<1> thanks for playing!
<0> forget this, im not doing this, what a waste of time
<0> =P



<8> beer++
<8> hto be real beer though...
<1> sam adams boston lager
<8> woah, console lag fail doom - *has to be real beer though...
<9> WHM == cpanel ?
<1> also got some B*** and some guinness in the fridge
<1> LuvRedheads: similar I think
<8> Evolution: come to canterbury - we have zilions of pubs >_<
<1> TwigEther: I'd need a job, a p***port, and a visa.
<1> :-P
<8> heeh
<9> didn't they give u months paid vacation?
<1> LuvRedheads: uh.. a month of severance pay, and a month of paid out leave :-p
<1> not really the same thing.
<1> :-P
<0> LuvRedHeads: yes, WHM = cpanel
<2> Evolution: 32mb is what worked
<2> my Alpha/500 now has 228Megs of ram !
<1> hahaha
<2> zzz time
<10> Does anyone know if there is going to be a 4.4 and a guestimate date?
<1> roberteh: yes there will be, and 'soon'
<10> Kickin... thanks...
<11> any rpm rebuilders or mock users in here?
<11> I am trying to rebuild fuse-2.5.3-1.fc5.src.rpm and fuse-sshfs-1.6-3.fc5.src.rpm for RHEL3 (Using a Centos 3.4 build environment) and have some isuses - the outputted fuse-2.5.3-1.i386.rpm from mock retuens error: Failed dependencies:
<11> /sbin/MAKEDEV is needed by fuse-2.5.3-1
<11> kernel >= 2.6.14 is needed by fuse-2.5.3-1
<11> I get that error when I try to rpm -i the outputted RPM on a centos 3.4 box
<1> noosphere: which version of mock are you using?
<11> 0.6
<11> did a yum isntall mock on my fc5 box
<11> my kernel is 2.6.17-1.2157_FC5 is that helps
<11> if
<1> not really.
<12> Hello.
<1> noosphere: it looks like it's looking for fixed paths, but it shouldn't be escaping the chroot
<12> Is there a place that users can set up boot processes, like in rc5.d, but for non-root users? Kind of like how each user has a chron?
<1> either you're not including enough packages in your buildroot, or you've got something else.
<1> TR0N1C: no. users can set a cron for something to start, and that's it.
<11> how does one add packes to the buildset? U mean add/install more packages to the chroot environment?
<12> Evolution: I guess that makes sense. Thanks.
<1> noosphere: poke around the mock config file and you should see.
<1> TR0N1C: you could write up a shell script to check if a process exists, and if not then start it.
<1> then toss that in a cron
<11> Evolution, even though I am using my fc5 box running a 2.6 kernel to create an RPM for centos 3.4 running a 2.4 kernel, would that matter?
<12> Evolution: How would I do it as a certain user?
<1> noosphere: it might.
<12> Evolution: I guess su - user; some other stuff... would work.
<1> actually, I'm pretty sure it will matter.
<1> TR0N1C: eh?
<1> wtf are you doing?
<11> Evolution, the fuse system creates a kernel module i believe, so I suspect it will. would that mean I need to isntall mock on a centos 3.4 machine and build my rpm there?
<1> noosphere: that or fire up vmware and build it in there.
<1> or possibly xen...
<11> Evolution, thanks for the pointers.
<11> would love to find time to learn xen, vmware 5.5 workstation for linux for now though :).. qemu another day too :)
<12> Evolution: Say someone wanted screen to come up with a few rograms always running. They became accustomed to having them there and would rather they are there upon bootup. That's what I was trying to accomplish.
<13> TR0N1C: I got something like that setup... ugly hack , but it works... su - user -c "screen -S -m -d /path/to/program" or something like that in rc.local ... very ugly hack.. and makes selinux hate me
<13> blah.. too late...
<11> lol
<13> Evolution: no need.. selinux beats me with it every time I boot ;)
<1> heh
<14> donavan, around?
<15> sort of, whats up?
<14> what was it you told me to do with nvidia driver install?
<15> not that I recall
<14> donavan, was it you I talked to eariler about killing X going to init 3?
<15> no sir, I've been away most of the day
<14> my bad I'm sorry donavan
<15> np
<16> hey, my question isn't really CentOS related but a general linux shell question. I'm using a public SSH server of my provider as a backdoor to my network but you can view my processes in w etc. I was wondering if any of you know a trick to hide the real process name?


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #centos
or
Go to some related logs:

Kooldock twinview
Gnokii itegno
#css
gentoo could not open default font 'fixed'
rollergrrl
#perl
ebuild touch error reiserfsprogs
#linux
#perl
Live internet raido



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes