| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> I just did a scan on my domain using nessus and I get something basically saying that "it is possible to query the remote server for third party names"...i've done as suggested and defined internal and external zones with the internal ones (80.234.2.0/24) allowing recursion and the external ones not but still the same error...any one have any ideas?
<0> nevermind, i just did the scan for an external isp...no errors reported
<1> hi all
<1> How can I make bind resolve just a machine name (without dots) to an address? so i can use > ping machinename
<2> can anyone help me troubleshoot a dns problem ?
<2> dnsreport is telling me that a CNAME appeared in my MX records ...
<2> I have these lines in my zone file ...
<2> www IN CNAME server
<2> server IN A 72.232.183.2
<2> mail IN CNAME server
<2> IN MX 10 mail.eccindustries.info.
<2> sorry, forget about the first one.... So should I just make it ... mail IN A 72.232.183.2 ... ?
<2> not sure how that will fit into the overall scheme of things though ... I might be having a problem with my reverse dns records as well...
<2> Ok, so I've changed the CNAME to an A record ..
<3> recently our bind seems to be slowly taking all the memory on the server 380`Ish MB 'small DNS server' and diggs into swap.. slowly goes into where it doesnt work anymore due to excess swap and fixes if i restart bind
<3> are their any cfg settings i can use to limit something which may eat memory ?
<4> how do you know its the bind server
<3> i watch it build up in ps auwx with memory
<4> and it says bind ?
<3> i cat /proc/meminfo before and after
<4> meminfo is generalized
<3> eh named
<4> so if you dont run bind this doesn't happen?
<3> the vsz keeps increaing in ps auwx
<3> no
<4> you compiled that piece of **** installion from source ?
<3> this server has ran for a couple of years,, just recentlt became an issue, but we randomly add a chunk of domains to it so.
<3> PumpkinPie, I was the origonal person that did it.. I think it was via apt-get in debian
<3> wasn't *
<4> it wasn't and thats the problem
<4> and I knew it wasn't
<3> makes huge diff ?
<4> yes
<2> One or more of my DNS servers are missing A records ? ... hmmm .... it appears to me not to be the case ...
<4> people that maintain packages dont just shove it into a .deb file... they make alterations and configure best practise
<3> kk PumpkinPie, I will try it via compiling.. (my usual way)
<3> ah :)
<4> you can get Joe-Blow Package Ver 1.1 that has a huge security flaw.. but if you install a debian binary of the SAME version.. it might not have that flaw
<3> yea the guy who did this d oesnt do this 'as best practice' he usually screws with things himself and says its better that way.. but in the long run it turns out as crap
<4> dont take what I said so literally
<4> package managers release of the same software is sometimes VASTLY better
<3> PumpkinPie: I understand what you mean, they may have their flaws but sometimes their are benefits
<2> but my nameserver DOES have an A record ...
<3> PumpkinPie: thx for the input, I will try this out in couple of hrs
<5> How does bind know who to send notify messages to when 'notify yes' is turned on (the default)?
<6> Hi
<6> I have a question about name resolution:
<6> If there are multiple name servers for a zone, are queries sent to them one at a time or in parallel?
<6> It's hard to find this information from anywhere, including the rfcs.
<7> Hi I'm having problems with connecting to my dns server from the outside world any guru about that could help with a few queries?
<5> How does bind know who to send notify messages to when 'notify yes' is turned on (the default)?
Return to
#bind
or
Go to some related
logs:
lookbehind assertion ruby
sqlite fuse locking
#javascript
#linux
#perl
#debian
shfs fedora
ubuntu booting kernel
#perl
#ubuntu
|
|