| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2
Comments:
<0> bic r0,r0,r0,asr#31 ftw
<1> mwk: funny that you mention it - I acturly tested ICL to make slower code than both VC and GCC :)
<2> nANDy: on itanium?
<3> tessier, they do. Intel makes extensive optimization stuff available.
<1> mwk: I think ICL made 10% slower code. Oh, and no, that was on an Athlon64 and Celeron M
<1> havn't tested speed with any other projects than compiling the compression library LZO, though
<4> Quartus: For free to projects like gcc?
<3> tessier, for free to anyone with a web browser.
<4> Quartus: Hrm...surprised EPIC etc didn't take off then
<3> Cost, demographic, lots of factors.
<2> windows doesn't run on it.
<2> that's enough, actually.
<3> Where the high-end stuff is being used, I have no doubt lots of optimization is being done, and with no shortage of optimization info from the CPU manufacturer.
<5> I have a copy of the Intel optimization manuals, you can get a CD for free, buy the manuals or download the .pdf all from their site.
<1> i have them as hard copy :)
Return to
#asm
or
Go to some related
logs:
No Fedora Core CD was found fc6
#math
aoss realplayer sound choppy
#openzaurus
PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function memcache_connect(
#css
#linux
osilicope
ubuntu rox-filer
xkbcomp FGLRX ERROR
|
|