| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> slow day
<1> yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn
<1> more of a night
<2> Hey
<2> if I increment EIP in a debugger I am effectively skipping an instruction, correct?
<1> no
<1> you're skipping a byte in instruction stream
<1> which can be an instruction. or part of an instruction.
<2> hmmm
<1> note that pointing EIP into a middle of instruction is usually disastrous
<2> there's sure way of skipping an instruction by incrementing EIP then?
<1> no
<2> crap
<2> I'm trying to get around bochs' lack of a step over instruction =P
<2> and
<2> what's a way to findout the addresses to breakpoint in the debugger if I want to break on a certain function/line
<1> objdump
<2> that let's me find the address in the ASM code, right?
<1> right
<2> and what about C code (sligthly off topic =P)
<2> and the answer is, again, objdump =D
<3> Why can't you skip an instruction by adding a value to EIP?
<2> well, nvm that
<2> my "plan" for making breakpoint was making an infinite loop and then jumping over it, but now that I found a way to get function addresses I won't need it anymore
<3> ok. As far as I know, as long as you can modify EIP, you can skip over (or skip to) whatever you want
<4> djlogan: indeed
<4> yuriks: sure you can skip instructions by modifying eip
<4> yuriks: you just need to decode the instruction to know its length
<5> hi
<6> Hello there ronny my little shnuggle tootz. It's wonderful to see you again. You're looking marvelous as always!
<7> gcc without any optimization, is just dumb..
<8> hi
<8> are there anyone_
<9> 71
<10> lol
<8> those are 0x45 ?
<8> woops no
<8> hahaha
<6> oh hamburgers.
<11> uhm
<11> can someone tell me what this does:
<11> ebp+8 ?
<11> especially mov eax, ebp+8
<10> moves the memory from ebp+8 to eax
<10> i think
<11> mh
<10> ?
<11> i'm thinking sorry
<11> orbital_fox: intersting
<11> what does ebp mean?
<10> google it, i am not sure about the dialect of asm u are using :)
<11> sorry,I didn't tell you that
<11> it's nasm
<10> google: nasm ebp mnemonic
<10> or nasm ebp address
<11> base pointer :D
<11> esp = stack pointer
<10> :)
<11> germany gets owned atm :)
<10> haha
<11> yeah really
<11> http://www.wetter.com/v2/?SID=&LANG=DE&LOC=7010&LOCFROM=0001
<11> orbital_fox: check it
<10> its german
<11> yes it is
<11> red means = really bad
<10> what are they getting owned in?
<12> ww3
<11> lol no
<11> some hurricaine-like weather conditions
<11> trains are stopped in the whole country etc
<10> :/
<10> not good :/
<11> indeed
<10> nrn
<10> brb
<10> back
<11> wb
<10> :)
<10> sorted ur prob?
<11> yes
<10> cool
<10> i wanna get into nasm too
<11> why?
<11> what are you doing?
<10> so far i have done some motorola programming, and some flat***embler
<11> hehe
<13> is there some way of accumulating elements from different source files into a single data structure etc?
<13> in nasm, I mean.
<1> platform? output type?
<1> on ELF [and others with arbitrarily-named sections], you can just place stuff in its own section
<13> flat binary
<13> I know I can do this in ELF, though, yes.
<13> was just wondering if it can be done with flat binaries.
<1> don't think so
<13> k.
<12> you could always use %include, no?
<13> aali - that doesn't solve the problem..
<13> aali - I'm thinking about stuff like a list of initialization functions, etc.
<13> anyway gotta go
Return to
#asm
or
Go to some related
logs:
#css
iptables snat example tap0
asterisk dead but subsys locked
gentoo what ebuild depends on another
gentoo avermedia m115
IRC RPG Bot scripts
RV360M11 linux
how compile unrar-nonfree
gentoo dell xps m170 xorg.conf
fglrx fifo timed out
|
|