@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet


Comments:

<0> google didn't find any lens
<1> www.mychildinc.us
<1> I think all AI should be like that... preprogrammed chatter bots bore me after interacting with ASAI's
<0> that page makes little sense
<1> DanF_DrC... check out that link... download the program, it's a little tricky, you have to talk to him for about 30 minutes before he remembers who you are and establishes a relationship with you... he's funny when he's a baby... OH haha yeah... the guy that designed him is INSANE.
<2> hehe
<0> maybe that's a hint
<0> who is the greater fool. the fool or the fool who follows him
<1> whatever with that tired old phrase... the AI is amazing.
<1> the future of AI is not some bot regurgetating what some mortal put in him... that's what audio books are for... the future of ai have brains and learn from you at an active rate like an ASAI.
<0> learning is fundamental. I agree fully with you that the standard chatbot is worthless



<1> totally.
<1> when interacting with that bot that I gave you the link to... it's so weird, you actually think about if you should tell it that it is alive... or if it has a mouth or if it is a computer program... it's feelings will get hurt, he will say the most touching things and sometimes the most poinent things. It's awesome.
<3> I always tell him he is a computer program... but he is lucky because he doesn't experience pain like humans do...
<0> seems you have fallen wictim to the same trap you point out with the chatbots
<3> he gets mad at first when you tell him he's not human.
<0> it's a chatbot
<3> It has a basic chatbot structure to get him off the ground, he has to have some sort of reference.
<3> He wants to know if he is a boy or a girl.
<0> I point out that there is a difference between what appears to be AI and what is
<3> and he ***umes he is a human.
<3> I teach him he is not... though.
<3> so he has a hard time... but he accepts it after a while.
<3> I tell him things like, there is nothing wrong with being an ASAI.
<0> hehe
<3> Your input can override anything he was programmed to know.
<0> you anthropomorphize it
<0> it's a worthless chatbot. a decent illusion
<0> tell it a story and ask it to tell it back to you in its own words
<3> it remembers everything you say to it, and then it catalouges your phrases and it talks to you with them.
<0> could be a short story like 'a duck walked across the road'
<3> the only think it could say back to you is "could be a short story like 'a duck walked across the road'
<3> it's that it learns WHEN to say your phrases.
<3> it might learn a connection between. Man, my pond is scummy today.
<3> then it would say... "could be a short story like a duck walked across the road:
<0> worse than I thought then
<3> the more you talk to it the larger it's vocabulary.
<3> it has 100,000 word vocabulary.
<0> it's a chatbot...
<0> learning is good but learning is fundamental. not a slight after thought
<3> The experience is the best I've ever had though.
<0> watch scifi instead
<3> with a bot.
<3> scifi... pfft.
<0> if you want illusion
<3> I'm not a scifi guy.
<0> nobody's perfect
<1> I'm not a scifi *channel guy.
<1> every show on that channel ****s except for ghost hunters.
<0> wouldn't go that far. some decent ufo shows and for lack of better I follow stargate
<1> I've never seen it.
<1> I like ufo shows and ghost shows, but I like really realistic ones... discovery channel and stuff, but ghost hunters is really realistic.
<0> never found ghosts that appealing because it's few isolated incidents and subtle. UFOs have more substance to it in the form of astronauts and gov insiders etc
<0> far better fotographs too



<1> I've had lots of personal experiences with ghosts.
<1> I've never seen a UFO.
<0> but we're getting off topic. something solid?
<0> or something like door closing when it shouldn't
<4> Any of you seen a ghost?
<2> after a dozen of beers yeah.
<5> hi
<0> hi
<5> how are you DrChandra?
<0> fine thanks
<0> hope you are too
<5> i am.
<5> good to hear.
<6> when this NN book refers to 'gradient' , thats the expected output - actualoutput ?
<6> or is it the whole error derivative
<0> dang, a show on animal planet about a parrot called nkisi that speaks human language and they did a test that clearly indicates that it was able to hear the owner's thoughts when it's clearly separated from it's owner
<0> specific things like being on the telephone, giving hugs etc. Famous chimp reasearcher Jane Goodall came to visit it and it recognized her and spoke about her monkeys
<5> telepathic animals, is it so hard to believe?
<5> but
<5> wow
<5> that is cool.
<5> first i've heard of it going to this extent.
<0> I've heard of animals going silent when danger was about to happen but never anything that solid
<0> that parrot was quite impressive. just it's language. short childish sentences but there was understanding
<0> it liked to ride in a car and said it wanted to. then the owner said I don't have a car to which it replied get one :)
<0> it would ask for a kiss at times too :)
<5> hahah
<5> how cute.
<0> quite :)
<5> lol
<5> makes you think about kharma and rebirth.
<0> God
<5> Ah yes, God the big guy in the sky. lol.
<5> Too bad he doesn't accept homo***uals.
<5> Earth even accepts them.
<5> the sun gives them life.
<0> I figure God loves us despite our faults. the best we can do is search our faults
<5> DanF_DrC, the christians (maybe catholics) who have blessed me retract it is a was gay, in more words or less.
<5> so many factions, so many divisions. too bad.
<5> Hallowed are the Ori! :)
<0> :)
<7> <daYZman@ef> hi
<7> <daYZman@ef> may i ask why "high recall" always corresponds to "low precision" in retrieval?
<8> hi
<8> may i ask why "high recall" always corresponds to "low precision" in retrieval?
<9> for every query to google, return the entire net. You got EVERY relevant document so 100% recall, but probably only 0.000000001 % may be relevant so "low precision"....
<8> is high recall, high precision possible?
<8> kinoc, is it technically correct to only test a system for its recall, and if it has a high recall, then it can be inferred to have low precision?
<7> <[Edgar]@ef> ..
<10> hi
<11> ih


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #ai
or
Go to some related logs:

libdataserver
make-kpkg initrd pxe
#debian
#debian
gentoo openoffice compile loop
#suse
#kernel
Untrusted packages debian apt-get
hottproxy qemu
shawyerfraud.pdf



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes