| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Comments:
<0> For instance, the "SuperDrive" apple has marketed for ages, was really just a simple Pioneer DVD Burner.
<1> aha
<1> But the Dual-core processors... are they mac only?
<0> Apple's 'cinema display' is really just a Samsung LCD in a nicer plastic case.
<0> You can buy the same monitor for a lot cheaper from Dell.
<0> Nah
<0> Mac is no longer Mac only.
<0> Macs run on PC hardware.
<1> I know AMD has dual-core processing
<1> But what about Intel for the PC?
<0> It's just an intel processor.
<1> How long have they beed out?
<1> been
<2> didn't intel just come out with dual core processors.
<2> they had the HT crap
<0> HT isn't really dual core
<1> Where can I see a list of Intel processors being bechmarked one after the other?
<1> http://indigo.intel.com/compare_cpu/default.aspx?familyID=1
<1> there
<1> Aha
<1> I see now
<1> Intel decided not to develop a 4ghz chip, instead it opted for dual-core development. That is why it seemed to freeze at 3.4ghz, but instead developed dual-core processors and it now at 3.4ghz dual-core
<3> [cpu] 2 Intel Pentium IV @ 4042.13 MHz Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz x86 Family 15 Model 4 Stepping 3
<4> Hostname: corkster.ok.cox.net - OS: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE/i386 - CPU: Intel Pentium III (648.01-MHz 686-cl*** CPU) - Processes: 106 - Uptime: 5d 13h 32m - Load Average: 0.99 - Memory Usage: 58.13MB/375.33MB (15.49%) - Disk Usage: 3.90GB/17.34GB (22.48%)
<4> Feel The Power !
<3> id rather get AMD x2 =]
<3> yeah nice box Corky
<1> OS: WinXP Professional 5.1 SP2 (Build #2600) CPU: Intel Pentium 4 , 3.00 GHz, 1024KB Video: Radeon 9800 PRO (1280x1024x32bpp 60Hz) Sound: Realtek AC97 Audio Memory: Used: 419/1024MB Uptime: 2h 33m 53s HD: Free: 179.82 GB/561.63 GB Connection: Realtek RTL8169/8110 Family Gigabit Ethernet NIC - Packet Scheduler Miniport @ 100.0 Mbps (Rec: 27.33MB Sent: 5.74MB)
<4> its an old dell laptop that was run over by a car destroying the LCD
<3> ouch Corky
<1> 0.56 Tb here
<1> Does the P4 4ghz exist?
<4> yeah yeah we know you have a big Vpenis !
<1> Hi Corky, you bbing still?
<4> well i go to the gym 5 days a week and lift weights like a gorilla but im not sure if i qualify as a bodybuilder
<1> I actually cut back from 3-5 to 1-2 and starting gaining because of overtraining
<4> more like a 49 yr old bald guy with visions of hercules :)
<4> I had to chill on my urban gorrilla routine also I was plateaued badly
<1> I would think intel would be trying to develop a dualcore 4ghz chip
<5> fuk intel
<5> i'll take amd
<1> Well we all would if we had a grand to spend on a processor
<1> :)
<4> amd is great for toasters
<5> dont need a grand
<5> not true corky
<4> they finally cool that ****er down
<5> amd runs cooler then intel now
<5> and they have been for lasy couple years
<5> last
<1> I have seen AMD chips priced at well over $800
<5> plus the wattage usage isn't as much as intel
<4> nice AMD 64 box gona set ya back 2 grand then
<1> yeah that is what I have seen
<5> yeah the x2 4800 and fx60
<1> FX-57 is a psycho priced processor
<5> i built a a64 4000 with 2 gig ram and radeon x850xt pci xpress card for about 1300
<1> very nice processors, but they cost a lot
<5> if you want the best you have to pay
<1> $1,199.99 for a processor. AMD FX-60
<1> That FX-60 would want to boot XP in like 2 sec flat.
<1> I mean we should be talking startup and shutdown in a hearbeat for that price.
<6> thats what they said about the original athlon
<1> Well with my Intel 3ghz after bios loading for XP startup time takes about 10 seconds.
<1> max.
<1> And that processor didnt cost 1.2K
<1> You can actually buy a 3.4ghz for $230.00, so I think you should get an XP loading time of about 8-9 sec with that chip.
<1> That is like 1/6th of the price of the FX-60
<7> So... I played EverQuest 2 for like 10 hours, shut down my PC, and now after the boot info I get the somewhat ambiguous message "Error Loading OS"
<7> umm... anyone want to help?
<7> me?
<8> what did you do it?
<8> to*
<1> noob did you shutdown properly?
<7> lol, I have no idea. Just played EQ2 for a very long time, shut down (safely) and then I couldn't boot again this morning
<1> and did you try to reboot with last known good config?
<7> I didn't even get far enough to do that
<7> It's like my hard drive disappeared , but it still show up on live booted Knoppix okay...
<8> noob_, could be just your boot.ini or your mbr
<8> boot from winxp cd and use recovery console
<8> and try the following cmds: fixmbr or fixboot
<7> square: I was hoping you wouldn't say that... *has to go find his CD*
<7> square: Thanks, I'll try that.
<1> hmmm
<8> just because knoppix finds the hdd doesnt mean it still works
<1> try repair using xp recovery on the install disc
<7> will do, guys. Thanks
<6> it ****s
<9> lol
<9> i had a guy from oracle email me to commend me on my use of web standards, CSS etc
<6> haha
<6> all my sites use web standards
<6> html 4.01 strict + css
<9> ya, but most people don't notice if you are using semantic markup instead of a bunch of tables
<6> i dont see the point of using xhtml unless you are using xml for your site
<6> wanna see the site this customer was talking about?
<9> sure
<6> http://www.kaywilkinsonholistictherapy.co.uk/
<6> what do you think?
<10> [M]ax 'document.getElementById(...)' is null or not an object
<9> ya there's that js error onload
<1> http://img212.imageshack.us/my.php?image=internal20gp.jpg <--- Inside my PC
<6> ||arifaX im aware of that... its cause there is not toggle id on that pag3e
<6> go onto services or wedding services and their is no error
<9> should be an easy fix
<10> ic
<6> yeah, but its not causing an adverse effect to the site
<6> so it will be "ok" for the time being untill i sign the site off
<6> will have it fixed before then
<9> but ya, nice clean sitee
<9> easy to navigate
<9> works with js disabled
<6> :)
<11> ;-)
<6> ;D
<10> on firefox the wedding service text moves out of the box
<6> ||arifaX take a screen shot and show me please
<6> as i have tested this on every browser available
<1> firefox doesnt render web pages properly
<10> why not showing it yourself using firefox?
<6> ie 6/7, firefox, opera, safari, camio etc.
<6> ||arifaX i cant see any problems
<6> thats why i said take a screen shot
<12> looks fine here cept for the java error
<6> Phiber0pt no java error on services/wedding services
<9> same, latest FF
<6> i got latest firefox
<6> Cpt_Kirk firefox does render pages correctly, ie6 is the one that doesnt
<6> and ie5.5 on linux
<10> [M]ax accept dcc sending shot
<6> i have it accepting
<6> unable to connect
<1> well you are in a windows channel and I think you will find that the benchmark for rendering web pages correctly is IE, not FF
<6> post it on the web somewhere
<9> loool
<10> must be cause i am running mirc with noadmin account
<12> who says IE is the benchmark?
<6> Cpt_Kirk ie blows balls, thats why ie7 has such huge changes in it
<9> IE's rendering engine is terrible
<12> the Omnipotent Order of the Web-Site Benchmark Clan?
<6> ||arifaX post it on the web
<9> OOWBC
<1> Well if you think FF is rendering web pages correctly and better than IE then I think you need to think about web designing again.
<9> http://imageshack.us/
<12> if you want to get technical, lets downlaod the html, and run it through a validator.
<9> lool
<9> Cpt_Kirk it does, that's a fact
<6> Cpt_Kirk means ****.. the only problem that this site has in ie6 is that ie6 doesnt like transparent png's
<12> then we can all bitch about where his comment lines are at.
<6> !quick Cpt_Kirk troll
Return to
#windowsxp
or
Go to some related
logs:
curlingplayers
reverse of atan
#freebsd
#stocks
#debian
#computers
#politics
#hardware
#windows
#sql
|
|
