| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> Treval: no
<1> I say sometimes because intel had their p2 clocks up around 1ghz to start with, (on aluminum), but they had to roll it back because the FTC wouldn't let them release it that high because their competition wouldn't be able to keep up
<0> BS
<2> heh, indeed
<0> something like that would help competetion and innovation in the market
<2> that's why even after amd hit 1ghz intel had to recall theirs because it didn't work right. yet you claim p2 was at 1ghz years befoer that?
<1> I'm only relaying what I was told by my teacher
<0> your teacher is a moron
<2> indeed
<0> let me guess, you go to ITT tech?
<1> hehe, no, OSU
<0> well your teacher is still a moron
<0> the p2 barely got about 400mhz stable
<0> above
<0> and a 66mhz fsb limits clock speeds quite a bit
<2> 100
<1> redhook: if you made a product that can do more then it's allowed, do you think you'd spend more reproduceing it, or skimp where you can ?
<0> Dry-ice: allowed? the market doesnt work that way
<2> Dry-ice, you're wrong, accept it, move on
<0> Dry-ice: if company A makes a product that blows away a competing one made by company B it encourages company B to innovate
<2> sorry, your teacher's wrong
<0> thats how the market works
<0> if companys werent allowed to release products that are better then the competitions we'd all be driving the same old cars still
<1> 266mhz was the max at the time, you have a 1ghz processor... stop R&D and under clock it for a few year and bank on it
<0> hahahah
<0> dude, there are 450mhz p2 processors
<2> lol
<0> I have one sitting on my desk
<2> and amd had their ss7 k62/k63 up to 500
<1> look up the first p2's clock speed
<2> again, learn to not take what your teacher says as solid fact and actually do some rea=ding to see if it makes any sense
<0> Dry-ice: the 400mhz p2 was released at launch
<2> you sound stupider each time you try to support your argument
<3> What is the normal color setting? 16 or 32 bit?
<2> 42
<4> stainer71: still asking stupid questions I see?
<3> I just got an error message saying that the game i am trying to play requires 32, and mine is on 16 default, but the game is old and the card is new.
<0> stainer71: 32bit
<0> stainer71: but its really 24bit, MS just has their head up their ***
<3> Will images be sharper etc?
<0> yes, more realistic colors
<1> Pentium II 350MHz secc1 slot-1 cpu 512k CACHE PII 350 30Days Warranty Same day shipping
<1> that's on pricewatch
<0> Dry-ice: and your point?
<3> How will that affect games i already have installed and have been playing?
<1> 450mhz release my ***
<3> I think i've been running them all on 16 bit :(
<0> stainer71: they'll just look better
<1> 400*
<4> I'd hate to admit it
<0> !g 450mhz pentium 2
<5> Intel Pentium II Processor - Product @ http://www.intel.com/design/PentiumII/prodbref/ || SPECfp95: Intel SE440BX2 Motherboard( @ http://www.spec.org/cpu95/results/res99q1/cpu95-19990315-03455.html |
<0> ***hat
<4> and yes Dry-ice
<0> now for something a little different
<0> !kban Dry-ice troll
<4> the 450mhz pII exists
<4> I have two here
<6> they're fake!
<6> chinese knockoffs!
<3> so will that give me more fps, the same, or a little less?
<0> they're made out of mararoni and glue
<0> macaroni
<4> stainer71: WHY does it even matter
<6> and rat poop
<0> stainer71: no, it'll JUST LOOK BETTER
<2> here's a clue, it's not running at 16, says it wants 32. just change it
<4> bofh``: this is why stainer71 is banned in #hardware
<2> !kban stainer71 you're too stupid to live
<4> he refuses to get a clue
<0> some people shouldnt be allowed to use a computer
<0> I bet they're both messaging the bot and bitching
<4> probably
<4> actually I kept stainer71 banned for several months
<4> because he kept asking stupid questions
<0> probably just a troll
<4> no he's just clueless
<4> been that way for over two years
<0> "my *** has **** on it should I wipe it?"
<0> I wish people that dumb couldnt figure out how to get on irc
<0> or atleast stay on dalnet
<4> blame the ddosers
<4> they made sure all the trolls came here
<0> we should ddos them back to dalnet
<7> do you guys find folks don't overclock any more? computers are generally fast enough now?
<0> there's no point in it really
<0> you risk burning out your cpu for a whopping 1% speed increase
<7> I find I always need more CPU. never enough for digital audio and music
<0> just get a dual core setup
<7> this is a dual core (opteron 165)
<0> no its not
<4> 165 should be dual core
<0> thats not even a dual processor setup
<7> Yep: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/opteron-165.html ("The Best-Value Dual-Core AMD Processor: Opteron 165 CPU Review")
<0> ohh
<0> thought they named those different
<4> but it's hardly optimized for audio/video editing
<0> yeah, a athlon 64 x2 would be better
<4> redhook: you're implying that processor naming systems actually make sense
<7> sh4dow - actually, I got this because it is so awesome for DAW. All the benchmarks for X2 vs FX vs Intel vs Opteron show this thing is a winner. Extra L2 cache helps too.
<4> an Opteron is optimized for stability
<4> NOT speed
<4> it's supposed to run in a server churning away for five months straight
<4> NOT run quake4
<4> I mean it'll do it
<0> its meant to be used in a rack mounted server sitting in a data center... databases and such
<4> but it's hardly designed for that
<0> its a shame to put one in a desktop
<8> I don't think the CPU cares what it is running.. it doesn't know the difference between quake 4 and Linux/2k3/Exchange.. it's all just instructions...
<4> Phiber0pt: it doesn't
<8> ok so you just invalidated yourself...
<4> but Opterons are put through a more rigorous validation process
<0> damn, those cpus are cheap
<4> Phiber0pt: no, a processor can be designed architectually to do certain things
<0> $327
<8> well I will agree with you to the point that they are marketed and designed for a server enviornment.
<9> All the AMD fanbois should recognize that Conroe and Merom are going to wipe the floor with AMD
<8> but it doesn't know the diff, you know my point.
<2> oh shut up
<0> xti: doubt it
<4> an Itanium doesn't know the difference when it runs x86 code either
<0> amd will just release something better around then
<8> xti were you saying I am a fanboy?
<9> theres nothing in their roadmap redhook
<9> all they have is socket AM2
<9> and DDR2
<0> although I hope macbook pro's have 64bit core duo cpu's soon
<10> it just runs it at about 10% the speed of IA64
<10> bah
<9> Phiber0pt - no, i can't ^5 my boy?
<10> stupid evening
<10> I don't see why I'm getting disconnected all the time
<8> http://www.digitalnowhere.com/haxor/
<8> muu haha
<11> is this a help channel at all?
<9> haha die Phiber0pt
<6> Lucky13: no we trade midget porn here
<6> Phiber0pt is our moderator, he gets first dibs
<11> that's nice too
<11> but not quite what i'm after
<6> well then keep moving
<10> damn I thought it was gay porn
<10> or was that last week?
<11> :/
<0> gay midget porn
<8> roto is the #bearcave founder.
<6> Shadowc4t: what you do on your own time, is your business
<11> having trouble installing to a sata, and its bugging me to no end
<0> Lucky13: www.lemonparty.org <--- helps you fix a lemon of a problem
Return to
#windowsxp
or
Go to some related
logs:
kismet +iw2200
#stocks
#sex
japstreetsport
What is microproccers
#politics
#politics
mack guarantie
jackassone
newzbin XXX section
|
|