| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:
<0> ooh
<0> Thadius is actually a junior american :D
<0> better name :)
<1> he's a Cadet in the Junior American League of Australia
<1> JALA
<0> hahaha
<0> jala :D
<0> !learn jala the Junior American League of Australia
<0> ?? jala
<2> xp99: its actually after the mobo logo....and before the winxp loading logo....can it still be the bios flash?
<0> aww
<1> bot's dead
<0> likwid8: why dont u just TRY IT and find out urself?
<2> ok
<0> u should do bios updates regularly anyways
<1> i've never done a bios upgrade in my life :X
<1> haha
<1> well, my computer life. (14 years)
<3> go to bed y'all
<1> FINALLY **** im done with homework
<1> time to slack off
<4> now you have to redo it
<4> muhahahahahaha
<0> hahah
<1> you better burn down the internet
<1> because its all digital
<0> roto is analog
<4> I know, I used rm -rf /
<1> xp99 is "anal"og
<4> I smashed the circuit too
<1> you forgot to pop the stack
<1> SLUT
<4> did that too
<4> and burned the server room
<1> i give you props
<0> :P
<0> roto likes logs
<1> shut up puff the magic cocksmoker
<0> smoker?
<1> did i stutter!!?
<4> roto doesn't have a manhood
<4> we fed that to |P-I-M-P| a long time ago
<1> umoms does
<4> yo momma's so fat Bush decided to tap her for oil reserves
<5> haha
<6> I've been doing some hard drive testing on a new system and chkdsk was one thing I was testing out. I wanted to know is it normal to see chkdsk to report cleaning up minor inconsistencies on the drive, everytime you run it like these?
<6> Cleaning up 168 unused index entries from index $SII of file 0x9.
<6> Cleaning up 168 unused index entries from index $SDH of file 0x9.
<6> Cleaning up 168 unused security descriptors.
<4> stop pasting
<6> and it's always from the same index $SII of file 0x9 and index $SDH of file 0x9
<4> sounds like the drive has a bad sector
<6> it's a WD and I ran all the Data Lifeguard tests on it with no errors
<0> run chkdsk with it checking for bad sectors
<6> I did 'Write Zeros to the drive' with no errors and if there where bad sectors that would of certainly given a error
<0> just run it anyways
<4> why did you low level the drive?
<6> of course I always scan chkdsk looking for bad sectors there where none
<6> bad sectors was 0kb everytime
<4> yo mamma's so fat the US Navy commissioned her as a new aircraft carrier
<6> because low level on Datalifeguard also tests the drive for errors
<0> then the file might not be fixable whatever its trying to fix
<0> roto wears a pink tootoo
<1> only on weekends
<1> =/
<0> lol
<1> ill try.
<6> this is something I have come across ---> This is ok. Whenever WinXP runs chkdsk on the boot disk it will clean a few unused index entries and as a consequence the same number of unused security entries. This is normal and does not indicate any problem.
<0> good then
<6> I have heard many people saying they get this too all the time on their boxes without issues, the only thing was I have never had it before where I see it each and everytime I run a chkdsk is all
<6> so that is why I have been looking into this
<6> plus I have a Raptor 150 this is on and being a new hdd makes me wonder if there might be issues with it
<0> there isnt
<6> there isnt what?
<6> yes there is there are issues with most pieces of hardware linked to other pieces
<6> there is no such thing as every manufacturer out there has tested their hardware on every other piece of hardware and setups and configuations
<6> I don't know everything I'll admit that but I'm no pc noob either
<0> its newb
<0> learn ur l33t spelling
<6> LOL
<1> fuqn n00bz
<6> it depends who you are taling to
<6> talking
<6> anyhow .....
<4> roto is a ****in n00b
<0> newbie
<1> newbie -> newb -> noob -> n00b
<1> owned -> 0wn3d -> pwnd -> pwnt
<0> newbie -> newb -> noob -> n00b -> roto
<1> you are SO on my ****list.
<0> roto: http://roto.justgotowned.com
<1> i wish you death.
<0> roto: http://roto.yougotowned.com
<0> thats the right one
<6> here is the take on this with MS
<6> actually I better find the XP one too
<6> ---> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=109524
<0> well if u know the answer
<0> you decide on it
<5> hahaha
<6> like I said I'm not a Noob
<6> BUT I don't know ALL
<6> :p
<0> this is not a know all thing
<6> please show me someone that knows everything?
<6> rofl
<0> u just showed the answer to it
<0> so u decide if its the right one
<6> actually let me grab the XP one if I can find it
<0> u can decide that cant you?
<0> showing us that wont make us tell you what to think
<5> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owned
<5> haha
<6> well MS has shown things that have proven correct in some respects BUT then other things have caused problems to mimic the same effect
<0> now we just dont care
<7> i'm looking for a freeware mail client that supports multiple user accounts without combining all the messages into one clump.
<6> isn't it normal in XP that there are always open files on the volume?
<8> yes
<0> AhUt: every e-mail client allows you to add in more then one e-mail client to check
<7> yes but it bunches up all the emails despite having multiple email accounts (not users)
<7> ie it doesn't filter the message output by user
<0> AhUt: outlook has rules that u can use
<6> well not sure then why the information on MS's site leads one to think that you can close them, I thought you are suppose to be able to run it from the cmd for the C: if you want to
<0> AhUt: u can move all e-mail that comes in if its from a certain account that you check
<7> yeah
<7> thats true
<7> but then my other family members would have access to my email (non-filtered)
<0> thunderbird supports profiles
<7> most excellent
<7> how do you switch between profiles ?
<0> are u running windows xp?
<7> yep-
<7> x64
<0> just give them their own user account then
<7> ok
<0> dont give them admin access, they wont need it
<7> i have never known how to create different users on a windows machine since i'm an only child
<4> more like only idiot
<4> but ya
<0> lol
<7> i'm an idiot because i've been the only user for my own computer since win 3.1 /
<7> computers
<0> AhUt: users control panel, use that
<7> i know that i can add users etc
<0> if u install thunderbird, it'll work with every user that logs in automatically
<7> but if i add users i'd want to partition a portion of the hard drive for the "family" group of users to use for themselves
<4> yes it's called permissions
<0> AhUt: that would mean you would have to move their user folder, sure its possible, but u can google for how to do that
<7> i created the users for the mozilla-thunderbird profiles
Return to
#windowsxp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#computers
fucking linesman mp3
#linux-noob
#worldcup
#beginner
#hardware
#stocks
#delphi
rndcomputing
lumbergenni 4*4
|
|