| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Comments:
<0> holy crap. http://ca-stu.smugmug.com/photos/54483645-M.jpg the dirt on the ice is **** they'd thrown on there for more traction, originally, it was a smooth slab of hard ice :D
<0> they tried to bust it up with rocks n ****, and one guy still fell and dislocated his shoulder, but managed to pop it back in and finish the ride, :-O
<0> Q: How do you get a $20k dirt bike over a glacier in the middle of nowhere?
<0> A: Very carefully!
<0> http://ca-stu.smugmug.com/photos/54483662-M.jpg
<1> Popped his shoulder back in and finished the ride? whoa.
<1> thats more a man then i.
<0> well, he didn't have a lot of choice.
<0> they were way up in hte mountains at 7000' or so, and it was a LONG way back to camp
<2> what are you gonna do
<2> sit and cry
<0> then die? **** that :D
<0> heh.
<0> Funniest quote (in retrospect), Irl beefs it (spectacularly and obviously painfully) on the glacial ice and is laying flat on his back on the ice slab grimacing in pain. We didn't know whether he broke his arm, dislocated his shoulder, broke his frikkin neck, or what the hell was wrong, we're 70 miles from camp, on a super steep hairpin laden goat trail 10 miles from the nearest flat dirt road, only one bike was past the ice, things just took one hell of st
<0> Dieter says "We could put some ice on it!"
<3> so can anyone help?
<0> https/adwords.google.com/select/ should be https://adwords.google.com/select/ no?
<0> works here that second way
<3> yes
<3> but not on my machine
<0> dunno, do other https sites work?
<0> thats SSL rather than regular HTTP over TCP
<0> hmm, is your clock set wrong? the cert for the site expires 5/2/2006
<0> was issed by Thawte
<4> hi, does network bandwith get reduced when two are bridged?
<2> two ....... ? huh?
<2> bridges typically improve network performance.
<2> you have been given too little information
<4> ethernets
<0> what kind of network bandwidth?
<0> how fast is this bridge ?
<4> 10/100
<2> bridge or switch
<0> what are you measuring the bandwidth between ?
<2> there's a difference you know.
<4> i have two nics on my xp system
<4> i am bridging the two nics
<0> why?
<3> peerce: my clock is set right
<4> so i can connect to another pc
<0> why aren't you using a 10/100 switch?
<4> pc1-pc2(two nics)-pc3
<0> why aren't you using a 10/100 switch?
<4> i don't want to one i don't have to since i got two ethernets on one of the pcs
<4> to buy one...
<0> uh, yes, that type of bridging will be WAY slower than a proper network
<0> as all the packets from 1->3 have to be processed by PC2 and forwarded
<4> how much slower?
<0> varies. minimum 2X slower
<4> half?
<0> could be worse. if PC2 is doing something else at the same time, it could be WAY slower
<0> even traffic 1<->2 or 2<->3 will be impacted by the layer 2 bridge.
<4> properly pretty slow for since i bridging to a wireless nic
<0> as it will have to make extra decisions on where to send each packet.
<0> huh? you said two ethernets.
<0> how is a wireless NIC ethernet?!?
<2> need help?
<0> wireless is slow too. much higher latency. use a WAP
<4> ok, it a eth and wireless nic
<0> anythign else you'd care to share?
<4> to be exact
<0> wireless has much higher latency and higher error rates and is half duplex
<0> so that will drag down the ethernet thats bridged to it, especially since PC2 is doing ad-hoc wireless in software, blah.
<1> wireless is pretty damn slow in comparison to physical wire...
<3> so does anyone know why windows would not redirect?
<3> firefox nor IE 6 will re-direct
<0> windblows; redirect? there's no redirect on that https://.... page.
<4> pc1(10/100)<--connected-----(10/100)pc2(54g)---)))(54g dsl router)
<3> so what do you think the problem might be.
<3> I cant go directly
<0> why don't you run etherrnet to BOTH pcs from the router?
<3> do you think it might be an SSL issue?
<0> windblows: insufficient information. but each of those applications (IE6 and Firefox) implements its own SSL, so I dunno whats in common there.
<4> peerce: well i do have some pcs connected to all the router ports in another.
<3> Peerce. I dont even know were to begin to troubleshoot this issue. I dont know what info to supply you to better help you help me.
<0> Bitz; then you need a 8 port or whatever ethernet switch to expand the number of ports. doing wireless->ethernet briding is gonna drag the whole network down
<4> ok
<0> sumtin like a netgear fs108, about $40 or so. 8 ports, 10/100 full duplex switch.
<4> peerce: i think i already have slow down the network by bridging two 54g wireless router together build join two lan together in two seperate rooms.
<0> you have more than one bridge?
<0> oh christ.
<0> I swear, you should have to take a basic intelligence and technical fluency test before being able to buy a computer
<4> was planning to set the bridge on one of the pc
<0> flunk, and you have to buy an Apple.
<1> Nah. they'd even **** up an apple. Speak And Spell.
<0> Treo.
<0> let the cell company provide support
<1> heh. well, at least the treo is easily reset to factory defaults :D
<5> Hello
<1> their software is particularly bad about where it stores user data (program files, eww)
<5> Is there a way I can get my hd to recheck how much free space it has left, since I've deleted about 4gigs and it says i still have 600MB left
<1> do you have some crap like Systemworks installed?
<0> Dark_Fox; did you ever install Norton Utilities, specifically including the norton "Smart Recycle" feature?
<5> Er, yes, but I disabled it because it was hella annoying
<0> uh huh.
<0> bet it came back on.
<0> find its control **** and use it to empty the 'smart' recycle bin.
<0> stupid piece of **** software
<5> 1.5k protected files..
<1> i ****ing hate systemworks. at one time I did use Norton Utilities. Way back when. But now, a combination of Symantec's acquisition and hence subsequent total halt on development of the software, and either OS integration of its basic functions or better products from other companies, Symantec has essentially run it into the ground.
<5> I'm sick of anti-virus software, I don't use it really, I always just manually rip out whatever I get
<3> is it possible for windows to block certain sites?
<5> Jesus
<5> Purging those files got me 6 gigs
<0> not that I know of, but if you have some kinda spyware or web redirector **** on your system, anything is possible, I guess.
<0> !info NORTON
<1> hey navce isnt that bad
<6> i.e can block sites
<1> Hmm. I didnt know that Metallica named their Ride The Lightning CD after the electric chair. nifty. learn something new every day.
<3> can anyone help me with my issue:
<3> Issue: it appears that this machine can not go to https/adwords.google.com/select/ but all other machines on my network can. I have tried going to that site from firefox and IE6 and they both come back as unreachable. Yet my other machine on the same exact network can.
<0> its https://
<0> not https/
<3> Correction: https://adwords.google.com
<3> https://adwords.google.com/select/
<0> can you go to other https: sites?
<3> yep
<3> but
<3> on google.com
<0> what errror do you get on google ?
<3> on the sponsored links
<3> my error on firefox is as follows
<3> unable to connect
<3> on IE 6
<3> "
<3> "the page can not be displayed"
<3> i can ping it from my command line
<5> Do you have the windows firewall enabled?
<6> doe you have security set to high in IE ^?????
<3> no
<3> i can not get to that domain from FIrefox nor IE 6
<5> Hrm.. Running service pack 2?
<3> yes
<6> telnet to the site's ip port 80
<3> k
<3> but
<6> see if there is a connection
<3> its an https
<3> so ill go to 443
<0> hes having problems with https, which is 445, and doesnn'tw ork so hot on telnet
<6> ok then 443
<6> try port 443
<3> what is the command to change the port from 21 to 443 in windows
<3> telnet adwords.google.com -p 443
<0> change a port?
<3> ?
<0> oh, with telnet. its just telnet hostname port
<0> nothing special
<3> k
<3> sorry
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#hardware
#politics
#beginner
#computers
buy-gmod
shinox+apt-get
#opengl
ToolStripComboBox DataBinding
Sharkoz
photoshop sgray
|
|
