| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Comments:
<0> OOOOH
<0> z0g
<0> haha
<0> yeah good son :)
<1> i need some help. :)
<1> other than typical psychological help
<0> ...
<2> regardless, im going to support him as well as i can. he needs all he can get when he gets out. so im giving him a car. i figure thats a pretty important thing for him to have.
<3> Hunh. Somehow, a stretch of Mendehlson snuck around the backside of Lou Reed and Marti Robbins.
<2> lou reed is cool
<3> I <3 Lou Reed.
<2> dude, i ate some ihop pancakes today... just a few hours ago. i re-realize why ihop is called ihop. their pancakes are like crack cocaine. i cant get enough of them.
<4> I would love something to eat right about now.
<2> ihop cakes smothered with butter, mmmmm, man, after eating those, you could just kill me right then and tehre, and i could say i have lived life to its fullest.
<4> I'd prefer to die during intercourse.
<4> I'm sure there would be some irony involved there.
<2> death incurred during the process to create life. yeah. that is irony
<5> but you wouldn't know if you were cumming or going!
<5> hahahaha
<6> anyway possible to get win98 to support files greater than 4gb? ;)
<2> Bi,
<2> No, too.
<7> hey guys is there a cmd.exe subsitute ?
<6> yeah, in your braw
<6> ;p
<7> cmd like substitue
<5> 4dos?
<2> Fat32 is the most advanced filesystem that win98 supports, and it only supports 4gb filesizes at most.
<4> :D
<6> z0g, gracias
<7> yea 4dos
<7> ahh its called 4dos
<7> got ya
<6> vova, #windows is slyyy ;)
<4> z0g^, and it's sooo advanced ;)
<2> reyeZZo: its curious why ANYONE would be running 98. that os is like, ANCIENT.
<4> z0g^, I downloaded a copy of 3.1 the other day.
<1> can anyone give me some advice on how to deal with this unmountable_boot_volume error i'm getting on my thinkpad?
<4> Floppies man, floppies.
<6> z0g, yeah :/ lappy broke down the other day and had a 266 kickin round that saved my *** really
<8> is an avi smaller or is a wmv even smaller?
<2> dude, back in the days when most people were all ****ing *****-whipped with win95 thinking it was the best thing since sliced bread, i was running NT4 at home. It came out around the same time. Not many hardware drivers for stuff in NT4, but it was FAR superior in terms of stability.
<6> 98 is the shiz though, i miss this os =p
<4> Valarie, yes, you would need to run some disk diagnostics on your hard drive. Also you may have some luck using a bootable cd like BartPE.
<1> hmmmm
<2> NT4 was the bomb back then. most people didnt understand my infatuation with nt4 , but it was simply superior
<1> partPE. i've been trying to run disk diagnostics, and it tells me everything is just dandy :P
<4> z0g^, yeah NT4 always gave me the square edge feeeling for a home pc though.
<1> BartPE, rather. sorry. thanks or another direction to look in
<6> val, are you hawt? ;p
<2> Dov-work: right, i had to make ALOT of sacrifices to run NT4 at home, but i felt they were justified
<1> i have big tits ;)
<1> but i'm old :P
<4> Valarie, so it allows you to access the data fine, and the folder structure looks ok? How about the boot.ini?
<4> z0g^, yeah I was so happy when the brought out Win2k though ;)
<6> val, thatta do ;p
<1> no no, i can't get to data at all. Thinkpad has this built in utility that i can access
<2> i went from rebooting like 5 to 10 times per day, to rebooting maybe once a week, if that.
<4> Yeah 9x was as stable as a rubbish bin in an earthquake.
<1> so everything i read tells me that the boot files are f'd up and to reinstall with xp disks, and this laptop came with no disks. because part o the hd is partitioned for full recovery. which means i lose my pr0n!
<2> Dov-work: yeah man, i was so happy when microsoft essentially forced the nt4 kernel architecture onto the industry, the same industry who was reluctant to create drivers for nt4, suddenly, they were forced to.
<4> z0g^, USB!!
<9> did i just see 4dos mentioned? mmm 4DOS/4NT/TakeCommand
<9> yummy
<4> Valarie, yeah they do that. However they also make mention of creating a cd/dvd from that partition in case of hardware failure ;)
<6> im loading this 233 to the tits. lol. wanna see if it'll run a dvd ;p
<1> Dov-work probably lol
<1> i must have missed that
<1> perhaps that is doable now.
<4> Yeah, I doubt you will have any luck without the cds though.
<4> You can always call IBM though for media replacement at a fraction of the cost,
<2> MS still has some grounds to work through though. i still find us rebooting XP workstations about every week on average. the servers last much longer, but because nobody actually uses them at the console. our linux machiens go months, ****, we only really reboot them when doing things like changing out a UPS
<4> z0g^, yeah user == reboots ;)
<10> you use linux workstations?
<9> what's wrong with that?
<2> we have a good number of linux workstations. remember we are an engineering firm, and most of our software was originally coded for unix systems.
<10> use xwindows?
<10> how often do you stop and restart x?
<2> Xorg at the moment
<4> I find I do not have to reboot my Windows XP machines at least for a few weeks sometimes. The only things are for production machines, like those used for graphics production, etc like to flush whatever is loaded into the RAM.
<2> most of the guys will jsut reboot the system when it acts up, but I know that all I have to do is restart the X subsystem
<5> but you still lose what you're working on
<10> i guess my point is, unix or windows, if its a workstation its going to require more shell reboots
<10> due to the user interacting with the shell
<4> Like I said earlier, user -- reboots :D
<4> *==
<2> digiwork: definitely, and especially what we do, heavily graphically intensive software, occasionally the graphics driver just goes tits up
<5> if it weren't for those damn users
<5> :)
<10> ya
<4> Jet, lets form a petition to remove them from society.
<5> but see, that bugs me.. on linux it's "sometimes the video driver just goes tits up, oh well"
<5> but when XP's video driver goes wonky
<5> Microsoft ****s
<4> Heh.
<2> digidog: but we've weighed our options, we've tested the ATI linux drivers vs the NVIDIA linux drivers, and by MANY orders of magnitude, the nvidia drivers just destroy ATI in the realm of stability.
<5> Bill Gates is gay
<5> and etc etc
<5> Linux users just ACCEPT **** that freaks them out when it happens in a Microsoft OS
<4> Jet, I think that has something to do with the type of linux/Windows user. Most Linux users actually have some clue as to what they are doing.
<2> ATI is probably looking at ATI like "ok, thats cute, ok we'll try and make some drivers for you", but nvidia takes that **** seriously
<10> thats because they have to dov
<4> Windows appeal to the m***es, most of whom their IQ does not match the size of the hdd.
<5> Dov-work: I'm talking about the same people
<4> digi, agreed.
<4> Oh.
<5> who bitch about Windows stability
<2> and it is a serious market. We spent almost a half million dollars per year licensing software, and it all comes in compilatiomns for windows and linux, and most of the time we use linux.
<5> are the ones who just deal with **** in Linux
<4> I hate overclockers who bitch about performance.
<10> !info overclock
<4> Nice.
<1> hee!
<11> <4> Windows appeal to the m***es, most of whom their IQ does not match the size of the hdd.
<4> *their.
<11> I'm confused about how you compare IQs to hard drives.
<2> I *NEVER* overclock. That is so ****ing stupid. I want stability. Why the **** would I want to compromise a job that can take a full WEEK to process, if the overclock causes a single instruction to go south?
<10> 80 is average
<4> rworks, It wasn't specific ;)
<5> I made some adjustments on a FreeBSD 486 I had to change the memory timings and stuf
<5> it ran faster, but after like 20 minutes it crashed
<6> lol. im ripping dvd rentals with this 233. and it's working haha.
<5> reboot, the HD was corrupt
<5> ick
<5> well, that OC job was WELL WORTH IT
<2> Yeah there is a damn good reason that the processor is labeled at the speed it is labeled as.
<10> CAAAAAAAAALIFOOOOOOOOOORNIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
<5> if its a home desktop machine
<5> and that's your hobby
<5> I guess knock yourself out
<5> but if you spend more time screwing around "tuning" your OC setup than using the computer
<2> i spend more time actually using my computer versus ****ing with its settings.
<12> what do you think I should improve on this website?
<12> http://streamtofile.com
<13> heh
<10> the name
<5> haha, I plugged this USB mouse into my laptop, the mouse said Dell, but the laptop detected it as a logitech... I *just* noticed the mouse says "Dell ... by Logitech"
<13> my oc took about 5 minutes to complete
<5> haha
<12> lol
<13> and i've been using the **** out of my opteron since.
<13> woot
<13> 2.8ghz opteron goodness
<13> CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP
<2> dell uses logitech mice. as do most manufacturers.
<13> http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=4214382#post4214382
<13> read my thread
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#computers
viewxpkey rockxp
#worldcup
georgepeteWENN230106_450x410
procmeter alternative
#politics
#beginner
#politics
sqlite autonumber
#politics
|
|