@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28



Comments:

<0> Xaxx hahhahahahaha
<1> haha
<0> </Dvorak>
<2> Darwin XP.
<3> darwin linux ?
<1> Microsoft will buy out Apple :)
<2> Why would it want to?
<4> to get a working OS?
<1> hah
<5> simpletons
<2> Windows XP is a working OS.
<4> semi
<0> people are dense. They don't realize that Apple is completely run by Microsoft and Mac OS X is Microsoft's REAL product, and WIndows is just a distraction.
<2> hehe.
<5> fk.. shhhh
<2> All of the bottom 10 countries were in sub-Saharan Africa, where the HIV-AIDS epidemic is rampant. In ascending order beginning with 191, those countries were Sierra Leona, 25.9 years of healthy life for babies born in 1999;



<2> Not even 30 years...That's harsh.
<3> huh. http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060328/faster_bluetooth.html?.v=4
<0> I bet we'd be able to help out with all of the epidemics and ****ty conditions around the world if we didn't spend $1608 per second arresting people for smoking pot.
<6> $1608 per second?
<6> sweet
<3> ultrawideband firewire speed wireless, probably > 6ghz.
<0> http://www.drugsense.org/wodclock.htm
<6> how do i get a piece of that fk
<2> Onlyup to 10 feet though peerce, hopefully they will expand on that.
<3> the War On (some) Drugs
<0> $600 per second is just federal
<0> someone is arrested everyon 20 seconds
<7> how do you boot from a cdrom on a mac with a pc keyboard?
<6> fk it's a great racket
<0> *every
<6> if you can get into it
<0> if drugs were legal
<0> we'd have less HIV here too
<0> and the drug "Crack" is a direct result OF the drug war
<6> there would be less dead people as well
<6> since you could control quality
<6> FDA style
<0> yeah
<0> well
<0> **** the FDA too
<2> FKnight`, it isn't legal here, but we have sterilized rooms for users to....use.
<6> yeah
<6> but
<6> it would work
<0> DrunkCow yeah
<2> Ice is a big problem here,.
<0> go to the store and buy extacy and you know it's not cut with some bad ****
<1> how would you control the quality?
<2> Ice seems so similar to crack.
<0> Amzin: the same way the free market controls the quality of everything else.
<0> people don't buy what ****s
<0> if drugs were legal
<0> you could SUE someone if they got bad chemicals in your extacy
<0> companies out to make a legal profit don't make money by killing their customers
<1> the only reason the FDA can control major pharmacuticals is because they require a large investment and capital to get started...illegal drugs are easily grown and manufactured
<2> There would still be street markets. How could you differentiate who's is who's? A reciept would bear **** all accounancy.
<0> Dov-Work: the same way you differentiate an pie from the Publix Bakery with the lady down the road
<0> you use your own judgement
<2> I still think it would be very hard to regulate.
<0> well
<0> I don't think there should be regulation
<2> But I like the idea.
<0> take restaurant health codes
<0> that can be handled privately
<0> you get a sticker on your door at the restaurant
<0> "Approved by such and such"
<2> You would have to explain US rastuarant health codes :(
<1> Dov-Work: it would..it'd be impossible as it is now...look what happened with prohibition...it didn't work because everyone could (and did) go into the woods and started their own stils..
<2> Ah ok.
<0> Dov-Work: Regulation is fine. The government regulates with a gun though.
<2> Bingo.
<0> the free market would regulate with competition and be profit motiviated
<0> *motivated
<2> Same way they are dealing with Ru-486.
<0> right now the US Government has a monopoly on what restaurants people should be allowed to eat at.
<2> That's terrible.



<0> through regulations
<8> i'm seeing a weird trend for websites down here in sunny cal
<2> Is it different from permits we are talking here?
<8> many people that paid outrageous prices for crappy sites 5 years ago are looking for cheaper hosts and cheaper developers
<0> chamois yeah
<8> dude
<2> chamois, now they all pay for templates.
<8> i wish i couild clone myself
<8> well not everyone
<8> templates dont always cut the mustard
<8> maybe the ketchup but NOT the mustard!
<2> No, but alteration is cheap.
<8> its hard to talk about generalities
<0> plus -- check this **** out -- the telecommunications lobby (Verizon, etc) are the people who get all these regulations p***ed
<0> to keep startups out
<2> Like penis size?
<2> :)
<0> it's not so you have better service
<8> cuz some peoples ceilings are other fux floors
<0> it's so they can keep out competition
<0> restaurant permitting boards and **** are manned by big restaurant owners
<8> well i did good jobs in the past so i get great references
<2> FKnight`, we do not live in a fair world :(
<0> well that's the ****ed up part about living in a free country. The people are free to **** it up till they fix it.
<1> we never will
<9> yin and yang cannot be balanced all the time, otherwise we would not know one from the other
<9> :D
<9> confucius say
<0> *till they can't fix it
<2> But Ying is a friend.
<9> Ying? yes. Yin? she's a bitch
<2> FKnight`, yup. Corporations run the commercial markets. You really think we as individuals have a say?
<9> how long was a chinaman
<0> well
<0> corporations are made up of individuals
<2> But select individuals ;)
<9> so are governments
<9> and you see how well that fares
<0> well
<0> yeah it blows
<2> I still love the first election into Bush's first term. Excellent example :)
<0> but see that's why the Constitution was written. The Constitution doesn't give the government any power to regulate drugs.
<0> that **** needs to be taken to the supreme court
<9> did you hear about the supreme court's latest ruling on medicinal marijuana usage?
<8> no
<0> the one earlier this year?
<8> they keeping it illegal?
<8> offense, url?
<2> They were in the coffee rrom having a toke?
<0> last I heard, the Supreme Court ruled that the Feds can still bust California medical pot people.
<0> even though it's legal in California
<2> Legalize it, but punish unlawful distribution of it.
<9> in the states in which marijuana usage for medical purposes is legal, the supreme court has ruled in a new precedent that the federal government can still press charges for possession
<8> well yea, imagine the feds attempt to bust 10 million pot smokers
<8> stupid fux
<9> you can search for it on google news, because I may be paraphrasing
<9> but I definitely have the general idea
<0> Raich vs. Ashcroft
<2> Goverment doesn't.
<0> !google Raich vs. Ashcroft
<10> http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2004/11/23/raichVAshcroftAGuideToTheS.html
<2> Man, I stil don't know how to use the WinInfo bot for googling :(
<0> 11 states have legalized Medical Marijuana though
<9> florida is hardcore antismoking in my area
<0> anyway, because the Marijuana trade has an interstate component, the DOJ can prosecute on the Interstate Commerce clause -- they say this is so even though the med weed is grown and used within California.
<2> As if Amreican's aren't paranoid already :-P
<0> the ****ed up part of it is --- if there was no drug war, there wouldn't BE interstate commerce of pot
<0> people would just grow it
<9> exactly
<8> the feds need to find someway to gfet the terrorists high so that they'll put down their weapons
<9> all because some dude wanted to use trees for parchment
<9> and call it "paper"
<0> yeah


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #windows
or
Go to some related logs:

#hardware
#computers
#computers
#politics
#nintendo
#freebsd
#solaris
#red
spanis names
petr nevded



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes