| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> THEY TOLD ME NOT TO DO IT.
<1> server ntp2.mainecoon.com
<1> server time.berkeley.netdot.net
<2> so, I'm stupid if I folow the documentation in the configuration file ?
<0> peerce has it right.
<1> but those are all local to me in net-space
<3> yes
<1> !info ntpd
<0> you are stupid if you follow the documentation without necessarily understanding WHY
<1> !info ntp
<4> omg. Stupid. :(
<3> omg
<5> the stupi daemon.
<4> The stupid pb.
<2> I have this in my /etc/ntp.conf: server north-america.pool.ntp.org prefer <-- the prefer keyword tells it to use that one, according to the same documentation that specifically states not to remove "server 127.127.1.0 "
<2> So again, are you calling me stupid for not disregarding the documentation?
<4> Who you calling stupid?
<2> Cause if you're telling me the documentation is WRONG, say it.
<0> yes. i don't have that in my ntpd file.
<0> and my ntpd works.
<0> across several servers
<0> amazing that!
<2> IS the documentation wrong or am I stupid
<2> answer.
<4> Wow.
<0> take your pick. either way, your ntpd is NOT working.
<2> that wasn't my question.
<2> Am I a dummy for giving up on my ntpd configuration and just cronning ntpdate?
<0> i could careless about your question. focus on the problem. not whether or not you are stupid or the documentation is wrong.
<0> if ntpdate croned works for your time needs.
<0> great.
<2> I am focusing on you calling me a dummy for using ntpdate
<3> server time.nist.gov minpoll 7 maxpoll 12
<3> that's all i have :(
<6> "time needs" :)
<2> And I am focusing on 12 years of this channel calling me a ****ing idiot for my **** not working
<2> when all I do is follow instructions
<0> fknight
<6> I never called you that fk.
<0> time to sometimes think outside the box
<0> if you remove that line
<0> will your server blow up?
<0> NO
<2> "ntpdate is for dummies"
<2> Apologize.
<0> why, you'll ban me?
<2> yes.,
<0> i'll just sign onto the bots and unban it.
<7> lol
<4> You go sloan.
<0> and then i might /kill you.
<0> just for spit.
<0> spite, even.
<6> easy now
<3> spit?
<3> eww
<6> no need for hostility
<0> i'm not the one all opered up!
<4> This is all skoal's fault.
<6> :(
<6> im sorry!
<4> Cause skoal is dump and broke his ****in redhate 5 box.
<6> I didn't wanna start WW000100100101
<4> WDF MAN.
<4> Apologize skoal.
<2> I want him to apologize for calling me a dummy. I am ****ing sick and tired of **** being broken out of the ****ing box, and me following documentation and people calling me an idiot, and now this ****er is calling me a "dummy" for using ntpdate, when the only reason ntpd didn't work was because the DOCUMENTATION LIED
<6> i already did
<4> k.
<3> no he didn't
<3> liar
<4> linux is evil and feeds pplz egos.
<1> !infomod NTP NTP server documentation: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/index.html ... list of public Network Time Protocol servers. read carefully. http://ntp.isc.org/bin/view/Servers/WebHome
<8> damn this thing be c00
<3> nei
<9> sAMOa: Whatcha gonna do with that there Shuffle?
<1> yah, the nano is a slick bit.
<6> Is that Dank's kid??
<9> You could use it as the world's least economical memory stick.
<6> He's on IRC already?
<1> hope you didn't get the black one, they scratch really easily
<8> gonna see if it can be used to cause clients machines not to boot
<8> and then use it to make extra bucks
<8> :P
<10> if i was directly connected to a router instead of wireless, would i get a better ping rate
<10> less lag
<10> ?
<3> slightly yes
<1> yes, wireless is slower and less reliable than wired ethernet
<2> except when it's not
<3> but you wouldn't notice it for the most part if you have a long path over the actual intarweb
<10> tight
<1> but, 'ping rate'... you talking about ping times in a game ?
<8> how do i turn the volume on this thing
<8> ?
<1> game ping times are a factor of MANY things, internet propagation latency is only one.
<1> sAMOa; the dial, just twirl it
<3> must have more vroom
<10> yeah game pings mainly. im trying to have lower ping rates
<10> when im on the servers
<3> choose closer servers!
<1> thats a factor of the game server more than anything.
<10> eh yeah
<10> true
<2> As far as the Internet is concerned, wireless is no different than wired unless your wireless signal is ****ty enough to make you lose 50Mbps of bandwidth.
<3> if you choose something in chicago
<2> which is doubtful
<0> clear if you are expiercing game lag issues
<3> it'd be quite a bit faster than something west coast
<0> you need to invest in one of these when the come out
<10> it is real ****ty
<0> http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/03/24/game_lag_reduction/
<1> FKnight`; um, wireless often has a significantly higher lost packet rate than wired.
<10> i only get like 50 instead of 100 wireless
<2> except in my house apparently.
<3> peerce: depends on the SNR
<10> the signal is poop
<3> if the signal is poop
<4> UH.
<3> then yeah, you'd get a lot of lost packets
<10> true true
<3> omg.
<8> oooo ahhhhhh
<4> WDF.
<8> whoa thatz slick
<8> FREE FREE SET THEM FREE
<11> do some1 herre play wow?
<11> *here
<3> if they were playing wow, they'd probably not be here :)
<4> samotr0n Sting?
<8> IF YOU LOVE SOMEBOLLY
<4> Yes.
<8> SET THEM FLEE
<8> yesh
<3> da more you ruv someone
<4> I love Marb.
<2> maybe I just don't turn on dozens of interference causing machinery in my living room where my wireless signal is.
<8> FLEE FLEE SET THEM FLEE
<11> they who r playing wow...which server(s) do u play on?
<0> are you mixing G and B clients?
<0> a B client will bring a G client down to B level
<0> in some cances.
<0> safljsdf
<0> cases.
<3> this coming fromt he guy missing an e
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
the incovienent truth
#csharp
#windows
esx 3.0 nic vlan
#linuxhelp
#stocks
bmevideo pass
#windows
#stocks
|
|