| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Comments:
<0> $4 million it sold for
<0> holy crap
<1> Gimp-Work: Yeah, I'll let you ride in it next time you're down here.
<0> hehe
<2> fdiv_bug: Are you still thinking of using FreeB$D?
<2> *snicker*
<3> how do you change the authenicating box on windows from sending <computername>\<username> when you are connecting to a non windows based share?
<2> It makes about that much sense to me, when I see that.
<2> Akin to seeing the $ in just about any word that has an S in it.
<2> It's just stupid.
<0> the day ****ing flew by wow
<2> By the way, whoever posted that 26' elimination link should have also mentioned that it was NSFW.
<1> skoalwork: Yeah, might've been nice.
<4> sorry skoalwork.
<2> I fired up the link to see some chick's *** parked on a lane.
<4> haha
<2> Good thing I'm the one that does the web content monitoring here!
<5> it was a ****ty link.
<4> should read urls. don't you know what perialisticsm is?
<5> he does now!
<6> hey, anyone here know someone by the name of "Drifty" or somthing similar?
<2> I know what peristalsis is, I didn't read the last part of the URL.
<2> Dadud3: I used to, but we killed him and sold his body parts on the black market.
<7> ooF
<5> and as for the stuff that couldn't be sold . . . mmm, yummy.
<6> Awsome.
<6> can anyone give me a Windows Live Messenger invite?
<5> NO. ****ING NO ALREADY.
<8> lol
<4> stop asking, Dadud3.
<4> honestly
<4> give me $25
<4> and i can promise you one.
<0> i'll do 3 for $60
<9> wtf? http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/01/23/intel_macs_25pc_faster/ so, they say that the Intel iMacs aren't as fast as Apple is saying they are, but they are still 10-20% faster than the G5s. yet they slam Intel repeatedly in that article for having such "slow" cpus
<9> then they go on to make the outstanding guess that Apple intends to sell its computer division
<9> god people are stupid
<1> Jet-: Seriously. The armchair pundits are almost always in rare from when talking about Apple.
<9> however, I am amused that the Intel iMacs aren't as fast in "real world" tasks as Apple is claiming, which is why I read the article in the first place
<9> then again, Apple switched to Intel to sell more laptops and tablets
<9> not to gain speed
<9> well, to gain speed in mobile processors
<7> harder harder!
<1> Jet-: Apple's speed claims where in synthetic benchmarks.
<1> s/where/were/
<1> Those tend to have less bearing on what most users perceive as better performance as the "real-world" benchmarks that MacWorld ran.
<9> I understand that. I just wonder why MacWorld doesn't seem to grasp that the G# CPUs couldn't be made any faster for mobile computing, and that's seems to be where all the money is headed
<9> and Apple wanted a piece of that
<9> so, to make tablets and other mobile computing devices, they needed a CPU that ran cooler and consumed less power at the same speed
<9> so they switched to Intel
<6> Everyone, die.
<1> Jet-: Apple also wanted a 64-bit mobile solution.
<9> why can I grasp that and "MacWorld" wanders into Nevernever Land where Apple is selling its computing division
<1> The next Core Duo chips are going to support EM64T.
<1> Jet-: That wasn't MacWorld, that was The Reg.
<10> Is there a slipstream utility that will tell me what I still need to download to be up-to-date? I know how to slipstream service packs into a bootable CD, but I'm looking for a way to know what updates since those service packs I still need
<1> The Reg lives in a world very different from our own. Make note of what they are quoting from the MacWorld article and what they aren't.
<1> MacWorld's article was fairly objective, as theirs tend to be.
<1> Could an op please take out the trash?
<1> Thanks.
<1> This client doesn't support DCC (yet). :(
<2> Sorry I'm late
<2> Which trash now?
<1> That guy.
<11> Gah. The fire thingy went off in our datacenter.
<11> $15k worth of gas. bahaha.
<0> lol
<11> Actually, it was just in the colo area.
<0> halon ftw
<11> Not Halon, fm something.
<11> skoal's pee pee.
<0> yeah halons prolly illegal now
<12> could be grandfathered in
<12> no law to retrofit was ever made
<12> just for future construction
<11> Aight.
<12> grr
<12> how come in outlook if i add an imap account, it automatically adds it as another folder tree?
<12> how can i make it use the standard folder tree?
<11> ralf.
<11> Cause it's Outlook.
<12> what imap client do you recommend?
<11> Doesn't Thunderburd do imap?
<0> outlook
<11> wdf man.
<11> GET A JOB.
<12> xtr, thunderbird is garbage
<12> Gimp-Work, do you know how to solve the issue i'm having then?
<11> EH.
<11> How so.
<0> yeah i do
<0> deal with it
<11> ahaha.
<12> XTR, thunderbird's calendar rocks, huh?
<0> thunderbird is a pile of ***
<11> There is no calendar.
<11> wdf man.
<11> Dude. I'm asking an honest question.
<2> XTR: FM200?
<12> no ****
<2> Your supression system dumped??
<11> skoal YEah. I beathed some in.
<2> That's ****ified.
<12> XTR, and you're still at work?
<11> Ted Wow man.
<0> especially if it starts on fire in an hour
<12> if i breathe that **** in, i'm goin home
<0> hahahaha
<12> hahahahah gimp
<11> Everyone else is still here.
<11> I breathed some in casue I went in.
<12> do they give you med benefits?
<11> Yes.
<12> to the ER
<12> that's where i'd be
<0> nah
<12> yes
<0> it ain't halon
<11> Dude. Honest question. How does Thunderburd ****.
<12> doesn't matter, its not oxygen or air
<0> XTR, the interface ****s
<0> the junk mail filter ****s
<11> Besides having no Calendar.
<0> etc, etc
<11> Oh. ok.
<11> Kew.
<0> it's like most linux apps
<12> so, if he has **** down the road... he goes to claim it, they say, "hmm, nope... negligence on your part for not getting it checked out"
<0> it works, but there is somethign....off about it
<11> Just wanted your opinion.
<11> Gimp True.
<11> TEd It's like those pills in Iraq.
<0> i guess ted
<11> The gas pills.
<12> XTR, it doesn't have a calendar, i don't like its way of organizing and its a resource hog
<0> back to my original "pile of ***" comment
<11> Organizing mail n folders n ****?
<0> :P
<11> :(
<12> XTR, serious... go to the ER
<11> Aight. Not trying to start a war. Just asking.
<13> since when was it safe to ghost your C drive from windows?
<12> its not a matter of whether or not you are hurt
<12> its a CYA issue
<11> Calm down. Back away from the Vodka.
<13> this ghost version 9 is apparently letting me do it across my network.. kewl if it works
<11> Ted It's FM200.
<13> anyone ever done that before?
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
vsftpd with net2ftp
#nintendo
soviet canuckistan + hongcouver
#beginner
#politics
#politics
PascalScript AddMethod
#flash
#unixhelp
|
|