| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Comments:
<0> just checkin
<0> tedski yes, i pasted it just then
<1> oh sorry
<2> it's just a name scion. get over it
<3> Scion-: i like to talk about *** more than computer stuff :)
<0> me too. dont get me wrong :D
<2> if it bothers you, you are free to leave
<0> not at all
<1> he was just double checking, go easy
<3> down barry, down
<1> and not down on me
<1> Scion-, well... what mode is your drive currently in?
<0> np doesnt bother me when ppl get all excited over nothing
<3> not on me either
<2> teebsgrrl: hehe
<4> OMFG
<1> Scion-, need more info about the drive itself
<4> THE BAND DAMN YANKEES ****ING RULES
<4> j/k :D
<2> excited?
<0> tedski i see
<1> FKnight` wanted to meet dave
<1> FKnight` was thinkin... hmm... i'd force him down
<4> dave who
<0> tedski baracudas 80 and 160gb
<1> sata?
<0> sata
<1> hmm
<4> ****ty ATA
<1> Scion-, make sure the controller is in the highest transfer mode... so like SATA2 or whatever the drive and controller support... start by poking around in the BIOS
<0> i dont know what sandra is so pissed off about at my drives .. seems to be fine to me
<3> who is sandra?
<0> my new love :D
<4> I ****ed the Sandra chick from Sisoft
<4> she was ok
<2> did she report your drive as failing?
<0> sandra=diagnostic program, teeb
<3> i am not tees, that is my hubby
<3> teeb
<0> sgrl
<0> sgrrl
<0> tedski in the BIOS? omg
<0> i'm a moron when it comes to bios
<3> Baracuda: there is a little blue pill that helps failing drives
<2> :)
<2> not an issue...yet
<5> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8848947683168137694&q=counterstrike
<3> hehe
<3> any of you guys watch the book of daniel?
<1> Scion-, why?
<2> but hey, in a couple weeks me and my sis-in-law can join AARP if we want :)
<3> hehehehe
<3> old man
<0> baracuda: no not as failing .. that's th recommendation .. essentially it says my drive is not working to its ability
<2> teebsgrrl: got 2 eps recorded. think I missed recording tonights because I set the **** dvr to 2 eps only of a show to cut down on m***ive repeated recordings
<1> ok, you all need to stfu
<2> scion: I wasn't talking to you when I asked that
<1> you're distracting me from this cyrus imapd install, kthx
<0> oh
<3> meanie!
<0> but that's what it says
<6> TedSki-: Cyrus is ****in' fierce.
<6> Personally, I'd recommend Dovecot unless you've got over a few hundred users.
<0> tedski: bios as in the system bios setup?
<6> Cyrus is designed for large machines doing nothing but serving up mail.
<4> Cyrus only do IMAP ?
<4> or POP and HTTP too
<4> speaking of email
<4> I'm gonna blow sendmail out next month prolly
<4> after forever
<4> sendmail's getting it's ****ing walking papers
<4> incorrect use of apostrophe noted under duress.
<4> I have a standing protest against "it's" being considered invalid for the possessive form of "it"
<7> moi
<7> aussi
<7> me too
<5> its is correct
<3> JET!
<5> every dog has its day
<5> etc
<7> if "blah's pen" is the pen of blah
<4> "It's" is invalid for possessive, although I disagree with the ruling.
<7> then "it's walking papers" are the papers belonging to "it"
<5> blah dropped its pen
<4> Jet yes
<5> hehe wrong, jet. :D
<7> nerp: I don't care
<5> this is why english is interesting. :D
<5> the weird rules
<7> it's a stupid rule
<4> it is a stupid rule
<5> it makes sense, or how would you differentiate between the conjuction and the possesive?
<4> just because it happens to share the same build as the contraction "it is"
<5> if it's = its then you're going to have to find a new way to say it is
<3> i am hungry
<2> sweet. visibility is about a block
<4> You don't have to find a new way to say "it is"
<7> why do we have the word "whose"... why can't we use "who's"
<3> what is blocking invisabilty?
<4> What you do is use your fifth grade skills of context analysis
<4> to determine which form "it's" is taking.
<5> english is cool with the weird rules.
<5> i like it
<5> its what makes english english
<4> there are many other examples in the English language
<8> suspicious
<2> who's is this?
<4> saying "It's" can't be the possessive of "it" because you'd "have to find another way to contract 'it is'" is a cop-out justification.
<7> FKnight`: agreed. There are plenty of places where you need to use context to determine a word's meaning
<4> Jet: yeah
<5> whose watch is this?
<9> whats the command to get master keys for win?
<9> ?master
<4> that's why it's taught to us in 3rd grade.
<5> the crowd is the group who's going to fart loudly
<10> master keys?
<4> and see
<5> it makes perfect sense to me
<4> look at that sentence
<4> you can tell what form I mean it in
<9> that works for every win os
<4> and look at the other sentence
<4> you can tell there too.
<7> how about "invalid"
<7> when is someone an invalid
<3> i got tbp to make popcorn for me:)
<7> and when is something invalid
<2> the why belongs to that
<9> well i need win keys
<4> Additionally, "it's" and "its" sound exactly alike when spoken aloud ... do you get confused listening to people and wonder what form they're using?
<2> j-fish: wrong channel for it. go elsewhere
<4> no.
<4> You use context.
<3> FKnight`: no
<11> i just got jalapenho and cheddar tortillas
<4> This is an example of the dumbing down of the English language.
<4> Due to the Left.
<4> j/k :D
<3> move on for god's sake!
<4> whatup CrazyD-
<7> FKnight`: I think its more an example of making the english language more complicated than it needs to be
<4> yeah.
<3> TedSki-: you were mean when you told us to stfu!
<4> I was kidding about the conspiracy :D
<7> "possessive words are formed by adding apostrophe 's'"
<4> UNLES
<8> heeks.
<3> so now i am gonna call you a butlicker when i see you on monday
<7> yup
<7> UNLESS
<4> UNLESS it's the pronoun "it"
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
#beginner
college fuckiest
wine mssql 2005
#beginner
#linuxhelp
crytoquotes
SQLDA missing or incorrect firebird
#heroin
#red
|
|