| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Comments:
<0> sup
<1> i dont know...
<1> ;)
<1> http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/downloads/downloads.html
<2> Gimp-Out; I used dvdecrypter
<0> try dvdshrink
<0> or are you going to divx
<3> Or dvdcannon.
<3> Or dvdwingus.
<3> Perhaps dvdifier.
<3> Or maybe dvdilize.
<4> ugh
<4> woman's ibook needs a hdd
<5> dvd****er
<2> dvdshrink's ripping doesn't handle a bunch of the newer copy protection
<0> like what
<2> i usually rip to VOB with dvddecrypter, then use dvdshrink to produce Dvd-r sized burnables
<5> How can there be newer copy protection if all old DVD players need to play them?
<2> I dunno, but they managed to come up with several schemes that work on most players
<0> i'd at least try it with dvdshrink :P
<6> 8 hrs
<6> 6
<6> no 7
<0> eh
<7> yeah i think ripping is more prone to copy protection stuff than just playback
<7> sorta like copy protection on CDs
<6> i use clonedvd2 + anydvd
<7> i just rip with dvddecryptor and encode to xvid.
<7> screw dvds. :D
<7> when i was into warez, i'd just donwload dvd releases of new movies, use isobuster to break open the image, and encode the xvid from the vobs there. :D
<2> i saw some stuff about clonedvd2, but on a bunch of forums people were trashing it for being a commercial ripoff of dvdshrink
<8> you do too, eh?
<8> I think I am happier than with dvdshrink and nero
<9> Anyone ever notice that outlook 2003 takes longer than outlook XP to grab new messages from exchange? If I send an e-mail to myself, it takes like 20 seconds with outlook 2003 to get it, and with outlook XP it takes 2-3 seconds.
<0> yeah
<0> cause it's broken
<9> outlook 2003?
<0> yea
<0> dude
<4> are you running in cached exchange mode?
<0> that juggling machine thing is AWESOME
<9> I figured it was just some interval
<9> TedSki-: same result in cached mode and regular
<4> hmm, something's ****ed on your side then
<4> that's not normal
<9> I don't think so, I've seen the same thing occur on a number of different 2003 networks
<4> doesn't happen here
<9> you have outlook 2003 and exchange 2003?
<0> mines slower
<4> yes
<0> but i could give two ****s about 10 seconds
<9> how long does it take you to receive a message sent to yourself?
<0> no email is THAT important
<9> It concerns me because I do demos that rely on outlook and 20 seconds is a long time to wait in a demo.
<4> Harvard, hangon, lemme test it for ya
<9> Thanks
<4> 8 seconds
<4> that's counting "one one thousand, two one thousand"
<0> besides
<0> just send the test mail
<6> [old] http://www.youtube.com/watch.php?v=mE3tqDLjSLA
<0> then talk for 30 seconds
<0> then click sendrecieve
<0> old but still funny as hell
<10> wow, what about installing configuring and administering XP Pro could take 6 CDs to explain?
<9> TedSki-: Are the 8 seconds consistent in consecutive tests?
<4> Harvard, i just gave it 3 goes... yea consistent
<9> cached mode?
<4> yes
<4> that'll be $8 btw
<10> hehe
<4> for 2 minutes of testing and consulting
<0> haha sartan i forgot how much that video owned
<10> ted the money making machine
<9> TedSki-: invoice me
<0> i would have charged him $125
<0> 1hour minimum and all
<9> 8 seconds is still a long time. With outlook XP it's like 1.5 seconds
<11> thank you i really missed being here
<10> oh noes! it's da poxy resin!
<6> that guy in the orange shirt is totally getting laid
<0> heh
<12> what the hell was that? nerd dance jam contest?
<6> body popping
<2> my linux mail server takes about 10 seconds average to process and deliver messages due to all the spam and virus filtering its running. if I disable the filtering it takes about 1/10th second
<13> linux is a piece of **** anyway
<13> u shud use nt
<14> what is this stupidity?
<13> what?? every1 nows linux is ****
<14> "every1"
<13> no gameZ
<14> "nows"
<14> hahaha
<14> you are tehdum. carry on.l
<14> s,l,,
<13> fuk u
<10> what the ****? do they teach you knotheads over there to use Z for S?
<12> i don't play games on my servers.
<2> its all the blonde hair, it rots the brain
<10> man they need a school curriculum enima
<14> hrm, can i be abusive?
<13> its spelled enema idiot stfu
<10> voB: it's spelled games idiot. stfu
<14> i haven't been abusive this week.
<2> TGIF
<13> stfu "Deryll" thats a gay name
<14> ok i be abusive.
<10> like vob is any better
<10> hahahaha
<14> nooooo
<14> i wanted to be abusive.
<4> oh
<14> man i oppered for nothing.
<14> *shrug
<15> moments lost now
<14> ya, no good now.
<10> amonfils: ehh you can still do a kill just for kicks ;)
<14> naw, not feeling it now.
<10> hehe
<15> man
<2> ahhhh, yes, one more week to Death Valley Daze XI. this time next friday, I'll be enroute.
<15> i need to clean my house
<2> chamois; TAKE THE WEEKEND OFF. meet me there.
<10> hehe now he's taken to messaging me with "GAY"
<10> oooo. he hurt muh wittle hart
<15> whatever happened to neil odonnel?
<8> man, XM online has a major lag between a song starting and the artist/title displaying
<8> poo. gpo has a URL max number limit
<8> think we'll ****can that
<15> hrmm
<15> my sirius receiver ****s
<8> it or reception in your location?
<15> neither
<15> its the display and buttons
<8> ah
<15> its totally unergonimic
<15> and the display doesnt scroll all the way
<15> so you get "The Beatle..."
<16> Who here is very experienced with wireless networking?
<15> !info survey
<2> fruitbag; define 'very experienced' ?
<16> Not too experienced.
<16> It appears that my D-Link G604T access point/modem doesn't transmit any wireless signals for my internet connection.
<10> very experienced means not too experienced.
<10> we have us a Paradox Winner!
<16> I can only surf the 'net via an RJ45 connected directly to the access point.
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
wankers certificate
#politics
#computers
#winxp
#gamedev
#openbsd
openvnc windows
#firebird
#politics
kingdom of auspiex
|
|