| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Comments:
<0> can they turn up the strength to say, poke a "non-lethal" hole through their bodies if they don't heed the warn?
<1> seeing as how said lasers are attached to m16's, I think they are saying "stop or we'll shoot, and we WILL HIT YOU!"
<0> warning
<0> "phasers to stun"
<2> its not the hole that kills them, its the m***ive lack of internal organs where the hole used to be
<2> therefore the device is non-lethal
<0> well, just a little hole
<3> i think we'll wait til they get complacent
<4> Hi
<4> Is this a help channel?
<3> i'm sure they all be laser laughing after awhile
<2> Wait til they get complacent, then we're shine a really bright light on them!
<1> !info ASK
<0> depends on what you mean by help
<3> Jet, the one at the end of the tunnel?
<3> ooF
<0> are me in need of help? most definately
<2> chamois: sure, but the light at the end of the tunnel is an A1M1 tank
<3> ok time to go train in traffic
<3> Jet :D
<2> M1A1
<2> or whatever it is
<4> Is it possible to set it up so that user's do not automatically have the ability to take ownership of their home directory on the file server?
<2> somervill: you can take away Take Ownership perms
<1> only members of the Administrators group can take ownership by default
<2> right-click the folder, pick Properties, Security tab, Advanced button, choose the user/group you want to adjust the perms for, click Edit...
<2> scroll to the bottom, uncheck Take Ownership
<1> thats controlled in Security Policies -> Local Policies -> User Rights ***ignments -> Take Ownership... on XP... i'm sure there's something similar in the GPO on a win2003 server.
<4> There are thousands and thousands of users all across the province. I can't do that for each individual user's home folder.
<2> aren't all their folders in a single folder?
<1> somervill; ONLY ADMINISTRATORS CAN TAKE OWNERSHIP BY DEFAULT
<2> ie - don't they all have a common parent folder?
<1> and, that means administratos of the server that the folder is on
<2> apply the change to the parent folder and tell it to apply those changes to subdirectories
<2> then you can go back and re-apply take ownership perms to the parent folder without applying it to the children
<4> Peerce: No, thats far from the truth. Windows gives full permissions to a user when they create a file (including the ability to take and give ownership)
<2> you can't "give" ownership
<1> somervill; security policies override those rights.
<2> you can only take it
<4> Not true
<2> and if you're already the owner, you own it
<1> and the default security policy is that only Administrators can take ownership
<2> yes true
<0> man, those airbus A380s are pretty wild. double decker.
<2> there is no "give ownership" button
<0> man, when those go down they'll take out a ****load of people
<4> http://www.windowsdevcenter.com/pub/a/windows/2004/07/06/transfer_ownership.html
<4> Jet: You are correct but there is a command line tool and there is a button in Windows Server 2003
<1> ONLY AN ADMINISTRATOR CAN DO THAT.
<1> goddamn, am I invisible ?!?
<2> somervill: so are your users using Windows 2003?
<0> 550 seats
<2> Note the new button here, called Other Users and Groups. Using this button, the logged-on Administrator can not only take ownership of the file but also give ownership to someone else;
<0> must have 25 crew
<2> are all your users administrators using Windows 2003?
<2> note THE LOGGED-ON ADMINISTRATOR CAN NOT ONLY
<4> Jet: There is a command line tool for non windows 2003 computers
<4> Jet: But that isn't the point
<1> if all of your 'thousands of users' have administrator privileges on your SERVER, you got more serious problems than this.
<2> its precisely the point
<2> if regular users have no UI
<2> and can't run the command line tool
<2> then they can't give ownership
<2> even if the server allows it
<4> Jet: I'm not worried about that. I'm worried about users taking ownership.
<2> somervill: I already explained how to avoid that
<2> remove Take Ownership perms
<4> I agree
<4> That IS the solution
<2> how are they going to take ownership of something they already own?
<4> Jet: Another good point
<4> Jet: I'm wondering how I would revoke that perm efficently
<2> if all the users' shares are children of a common parent, then apply the perm to the parent
<2> and have the change cascade
<5> Man. You really do need to be rock steady the further out you zoom. But I think I got one of my coolest pics ever. Looks like a robin went to warp.
<2> SD70ACe: I think we discussed this a while back
<0> Subject: Jeremy Rod**** detroys Eric's *** with his tool 01
<0> ah, the cl***ics
<6> something here is warped, but i don't think it's the robin.
<5> Jet: Yes, I knew. But I was getting in some good practice tonight.
<2> you get your 1.5X extender?
<4> Jet: So I would add the user group to the parent and the permission I set for that would be to disable the ability to take ownership and then I would propogate it to all the children containers and objects?
<5> Yes.
<5> Got some pics where it looks like I am standing next to the robin.
<0> I think Robin went to warp...on batman.
<2> yes, you'll probably have to apply the change for OWNER and for Users(or whatever group your users are in)
<5> I think I will upload a few.
<1> SD70ACe; standard rule of thumb for handheld is the shutter speed should be at LEAST as high as the focal length, at least for 35mm camears. for digital, you probably should adjust for the focal aspect ratio (i.e. 100mm on my EOS Rebel is equiv to 160mm on 35mm, so should be at least 1/160th
<5> peerce: I don't know what any of that means. I push the button, it takes a picture. :D
<7> yes
<1> does your camera show the shutter speed and f/stop its going to use?
<1> awww, never mind. get a tripod or monopod if you're going to do long telephoto photography, the results come out much better.
<5> It does. I know I need a pod, and I plan to get both a tripod and a monopod for different situations.
<5> I will probably learn what those things mean eventually.
<1> the rule of thumb is, whatever your lens's focal length is, you should keep the shutter speed above that. so if its a 100mm lens, shoot at 1/100th or faster. on digital, I'd recommend doubling that, so 1/200th or faster for a 100mm lens.
<1> you're using a point-n-shoot digicam with a teleconverter?
<0> you've taken some damn nice pictures from what I've seen, sD
<8> whne using system restore
<8> will system restore
<8> modify any other files
<8> besides system files
<8> on any other drivers or folder?
<5> peerce: Yes.
<1> system restore just rolls the registry back.
<8> ok
<1> SD70ACe; whats the focal length range of the lens? might be something like 7-32mm or whatever.
<1> also, whats the multiplier of the teleconverter? 1.5X ? 2X ?
<8> ok doing system restore now
<5> 1.5
<8> rollin her back to yesterday
<8> :)
<5> How do I know what the focal length is?
<1> should be printed on the lens, or whats the brand/model of the camera ?
<0> does it meet your approval, peerce?
<2> haha
<0> perhaps instead of gasbagging specs you could go out and actually take some ****ing pictures as nice as SD;s
<0> :)
<2> SD70ACe: does that extender go on top of the lens, or between the lens and the body?
<2> cause I didn't think the lens was detactable
<5> Let me look. It is a Canon S2 IS.
<5> Jet: Front of the lens.
<1> SD70ACe; i can look it up
<2> ah
<2> k
<5> peerce: OK.
<1> ok, its a 6.0-72mm range.
<1> so 72mm X 1.5 is, um.... 108mm. i'd suggest trying ot keep the shutter speed well above 1/100th when handholding at max telephoto.
<1> the IS helps a lot, otherwise I was gonna say about 1/250th. :D
<1> er, above.
<9> am i going to have to reinstall this entire computer if reinstalling outlook doesn't fix my freezing problem?
<1> if you use the 'sports' mode on the dial, it will maximize shutter speed
<1> falter; we don't knwo whats wrong, so we can't answer that.
<9> well
<9> it starts
<9> but the minute it tries to send/receive, it freezes up
<9> i have spambayes, winfax, etc installed.. all of which have little add-ins to it
<9> but even in safemode it won't work properly
<5> peerce: I think the IS is helping quite a bit.
<5> I am about to upload 14 pics I took tonight. Descripting them now.
<1> hmm, I don't SEE a 'sports' mode on that cam
<5> Oh, yeah. I was going to look up sports mode a few months back.
<1> well, you could put it in `Tv` (shutter priority) and manually set the shutter to 1/150 or 1/200, then let it auto set the f-stop
<2> meh, I'll take someone who actually takes pictures with a point-and-shoot over someone with thousands of dollars in camera equipment who just talks about it... same as I'll take someone who makes pretty websites with a P2-233 over someone with the latest and greatest P4 who only IRCs onit
<1> ooof, that '72mm' lens is equivalent to a 430mm lens on a 35mm film cam, so 1.5X that is 600mm. ok, try and use 1/1000th for handholding extreme telephotos
<2> it ain't what you got, its how you use it
<8> i did system restore, but upon putting in the bluetooth dongle it still gives the device is not recognized and has malfunctioned why is this??????????????
<10> foreigene : because blue tooth, usb, and every other plug and play design ****s
<10> ****ing amazing though
<10> that **** worked great on my Atari
<11> Jet: so your wife tells you?
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#winxp
#gentoo
#politics
#politics
#politics
#gentoo
#gentoo
#stocks
#beginner
bratty observers.net
|
|