| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
Comments:
<0> FK: I keep wondering that.
<1> and, it's not integrated, you have to install 1.1 first, sp1 is just a patch
<2> FKnight`: because they'd have to rebuild the installer and test it... the pre-sp1 **** is already tested
<1> even tho it's bigger then the 1.1 installer....
<3> http://www.hollywoodrag.com/index.php?/celebrity/image_full/868/ creepy
<2> I agree, it'd be nice if it were a finished thing
<4> cheers
<2> but they need to have the patch add-on anyway
<5> I guess they have other **** to do too :D
<6> I love the Burger King.
<0> He's kind of creepy sometimes.
<3> very
<2> I wonder if he's stuffin' brook burke
<7> he's ber creepy all the time.
<1> but yeah, neither installation package of .net requires a reboot
<8> the burger king looks dangerous
<9> the burgerking muther****er...
<3> i wonder if he has a whopper in his pants?
<1> brook's a mother?
<9> man if he showed up on my doorstep all quick like that
<9> he woudl see the end of my bat
<8> 2 kids i think
<2> Okay, here's what bugs me... I instlaled .net 2.0 on a new system, everytime I go to windowsupdate, it wants me to install framework 1.1
<1> oh yeah jet
<2> it's like, um, doesn't 2.0 support 1.1?
<1> 2.0 sometimes breaks 1.1
<2> I know there are incompatibilities
<1> and **** that links against 1.1, doesn't work with 2.0
<1> it has to be recompiled
<2> but I'm not carrying all that baggage around
<5> I thought they were intended be installed side by side
<5> because some apps require 1.1
<2> they are
<5> and some require 2.0
<1> that doesn't mean it works
<8> Joe-7: so violent!
<2> but 1.1 apps will run on 2.0 if they find it
<9> teebsgrrl
<1> not true
<2> ***uming they work
<5> I didn't know that
<9> the dude is clearly a rapist
<5> I Thought 1.1 apps needed 1.1
<1> very very very wrong jet
<9> I mean, one minute you are alone, then the next he is right behind you
<2> Gimp-Cow: huh?
<1> 1.1 apps REQUIRE 1.1
<2> I have framework 2.0 installed, that's it
<5> yeah
<8> Joe-7: so, you are covering your ***? hehe
<5> 1.1 apps require 1.1
<1> trust me
<2> and Paint .net runs fine
<5> and 2.0 apps require 2.0
<9> teebsgrrl, in a sense... yes.
<9> :)
<1> this is why act doesn't run on xp64
<1> because you can't get 1.1 x64
<8> Joe-7: date tonight?
<9> no
<2> an app can demand a version
<8> :(
<1> Jet, i suspect paint is compiled to use both
<9> yeah
<2> but if an app doesn't demand a framework version
<9> this one girl, I dont know if she is daft or what
<1> yeah but most do
<2> it will run on any upversion framework
<1> because it's stupid not to require a version
<1> cause then it might break
<9> maybe IM just on the wrong ladder
<1> joe
<1> i can find out for you
<1> ;-)
<9> gimp hehe
<10> FKnight`, ok client is installed and functioning
<8> hehe
<10> i noticed SAV has a Client Firewall?
<10> how do i install that for my client
<9> you will push my ladder off the building...
<9> and put your own up haha
<5> Segmental:> don't know. never installed that:D
<5> I use XP SP2 firewall
<1> nah it's more of a hair lowering
<1> generally
<10> k
<1> SAV?
<1> oh god
<1> not corp i hope
<1> i hate that ****
<5> what's wrong with SAV CORP
<1> i gotta start carrying around a flashkey with the registry settings to turn it off, seriously
<1> it's hard to turn off if it's centrally locked #1
<5> I generally don't like disabling people's AV software, but ok :D
<1> #2, it's harder to configure for the same reason
<1> if you add a firewall into it
<1> it's gonna be a huge bitch for me
<5> I think being able to lock antivirus in an ON state is the actual POINT
<8> potty break!
<1> well fk, you're supporting ****
<1> i'm trying to install new ****
<1> it's not like i leave it off :P
<10> sav owns u
<1> but you gotta exclude certain dirs or **** will just bog down like woah
<5> if you're trying to install **** on a computer and the IT department has locked antivirus to where you can't turn it off, then perhaps you should check with them before installing software
<0> Which version of SAV has a firewall?
<1> FKnight`, usually they are too retarded to even remember the master p***word
<1> the good ones pull out a pocketpc and turn it off from there :P
<5> that still doesn't mean SAV Corp ****s
<5> because it's doing what it's supposed to do
<1> oh no, it's a good thing
<1> it just happens to be at odds with what i want =)
<2> can you even get consumer Symantec AV stand alone anymore... doesn't it come as part of the "System Security" or "Internet Security" bundle
<2> that contains anti-spyware, firewall, etc etc
<2> bloatware
<1> heh
<1> yeah it requires 3 different exceptions in the firewall to make act work properly
<2> my parents had that **** on their Dell laptop
<1> cause of local SQL connections and ****
<2> a "trial" thing
<2> that was like 190MB installed
<1> yup
<0> Oh. I was thinking of corporate.
<10> FKnight` i found my app
<2> removed it all and installed AVG
<10> GFI LANGuard
<10> it does deployment of patches, service packs and programs
<1> also, I love how EVERY ****ing version of norton, has a seriously different configuration layout
<10> saves me time and my dad doesnt need to work about it
<1> especially internet security
<1> i have a client that runs 4, ****ing FOUR software firewalls
<3> http://johndx.com/gallerizer.php?url=http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://www.forumophilia.com/download.php?id=688[48-55]
<1> and god forbid i turn any of them off
<2> Gimp-Cow: that's insane
<2> does he think that makes him safer?
<0> I wouldn't want to go near anyone that does that.
<1> also has 3 av clients
<1> two of which scan outbound mail
<8> azurejim: too much dark eye makeup
<1> and he wonders why outlook keeps crashing....
<5> Norton internet security blows
<5> "Don't warn me about this app again"
<5> 2 days later
<5> "I SAID"
<5> "Don't warn me about this app again"
<5> etc
<11> does it warn you about itself :) remember crashguard? ahahah
<8> it has memory issues, poor old thing
<1> heh sometimes when it live updates
<1> it duplicates your ENTIRE ruleset
<1> but with the opposite settings
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#slackware
dragons-lair java mobile
#freebsd
#cisco
ouynk.
#windows
#cisco
#politics
#beginner
#nhl
|
|