| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
Comments:
<0> pale: Probably hoping to spot live addresses.
<1> enabled but prompt. 99 times out of 100 i click no.
<2> i just disabled them.
<3> SD70MAC: hormel tamales? sound icky
<0> grrl: But they're yummy.
<2> there's a guy in my office that puts read receipts on everything
<4> yeah
<5> anyone know a pdf reader in which you can "bookmark" where you last left off?
<0> Figure out how to fake them and start sending scads of them.
<4> I think read receipts are universally disliked
<2> SD70MAC, no THAT is a good idea...
<2> *now
<0> I don't mind them for certain things.
<4> I don't think I have mine enabled as I never get them anymore.. or maybe people just don't use them anymore. I've NEVER clicked "yes"
<6> read receipts in Internet email are useless because you have no guarantee the recipient will send one
<6> at least with cc:Mail you knew that if you put a read recipient on a message you'd get a response if they opened the message
<4> Jet; That makes them "not very useful" but not "useless" D
<4> :D
<6> of course, "read" receipt is dumb anyway, since it's a "they opened it" receipt
<6> there is no proof they "read" it
<5> anyone?
<7> all our email blast **** uses embedded 1pixel image tags
<2> flammingo, no idea.
<4> it's a "clicked the read recipt button"
<7> which yeah, doesn't always work
<5> frig
<7> but works way more often then receipts
<6> Gimp-Cow: no longer works in Outlook
<7> depebds
<7> depends*
<7> most of my clients turn that image thingy back to automatic
<4> That's why I like Outlooks "Don't DL images" on default optoin
<4> so bad ***
<7> cause they don't like clicking
<2> heh.
<4> Outlook knows what's up with that scam
<8> just made my FK Mocha
<7> of course
<4> hm
<4> 66 outside
<4> too cold for shorts? I'll find out
<2> gimp-cow laziness works in your favor, dude.
<7> aha, i've got it
<3> what is fk mocha?
<6> well, ya, but people who configure Outlook to automatically download images are, um, dumb
<8> Regular Coffee, half and half, Special Dark syrup, chocolate reddi-whip
<4> ****, I have to find the path of this marathon
<7> use a remote CSS sheet
<6> not to be too judgemental or anything :)
<0> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4614736.stm <--- Abobader has been buried.
<7> so when outlook renders the page, it HAS to request it
<2> jet, not at all. ;)
<3> i freaking love chocloate redi whip!
<3> its like cheap choc mouse
<6> Gimp-Cow: does that work?
<7> then as long as your email client does HTTP parsing, you'll get the "read receipt"
<7> jet cause it hits your server
<7> same concept as the image
<6> but does Outlook request remote CSS files?
<6> without prompting
<7> probably
<7> almost certainly
<6> hm
<0> We should start sending the Crown Prince bills.
<6> okay, that's the next thing they need to remove then
<7> hehe
<6> of course, then HTML emails would arrive all ****ed up
<7> you could prolly do something with DHTML
<7> yeah
<7> well css doesn't really _work_ in ie
<6> and people would get a prompt like "To see this email properly, click Yes to download CSS"
<7> just some wierd subset of it
<6> so everyone would click Yes
<6> because they want to see the email properly
<7> i've seen menus on websites be coded entirely using CSS
<7> it's bad***
<6> uh huh
<9> wtf is css
<3> i know what css means!!!!!!!
<7> http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/menus/demo.html
<7> pwn.
<3> cascading style sheets
<2> cascading style sheets
<7> (don't view it in IE) :P
<9> like a cascading waterfall
<2> um... sure
<7> http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/curvelicious/demo.html
<7> that's also really ****in sweet
<6> CSS support in IE is lacking, but it works well enough to make things like pull-down driven menuing and collapsible tree views work across most of the major browsers
<4> "CSS" is another thing I'm sick of.
<6> which is all I need
<3> someone needs to be impressed that i know what css are
<6> teebsgrrl: oh, we are
<6> but you're probably thinking of the game
<4> like, big ****ing deal. Now people get all pissed if you use <bold>text</bold> to make text bold
<4> like, "OMG! USE CSS!@#@!#
<0> grrl: Lucky guess? :D
<2> nice curves
<7> nah cody it's nice
<6> it's about separating content from presentation
<7> you just throw data into a backend
<7> and it magically gets formatted
<3> SD70MAC: no, tbp was telling me about them one day
<1> <b> is deprecated and has been literally for years. at the very least use <strong>.
<3> and i remembered what css stood for and what they kinda are
<4> pale_blue: What do you mean?
<3> Jet: what game?
<10> xp services pack 3 out? i heard they stopped developing it.
<7> the thing that impresses me the most about that guy's site is, it's noticably faster then the javascript eqivalent
<6> you know, they should add Microsoft's expression() support to CSS in general
<7> and certainly faster then flash
<6> iCER: you heard wrong
<7> it's just...responsive, i dunno
<6> teebsgrrl: counterstrike:something
<7> i'm sick of websites that max out my cpu cause they are fullscreen ****ing flash
<7> counterstrike:source
<11> Good morning, sluts.
<3> Jet: no, i knew what it meant in this context, see above where i said what it was first
<10> so there is a service pack 3 for XP and it is now out?
<1> no, it's not out yet.
<4> http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=sports&id=3778555
<4> wtf
<0> icer: No.
<6> iCER: no
<4> people are already finishing? :D
<6> iCER: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/servicepacks.mspx
<1> AFAIK it hasn't even been formally announced.
<7> SP4 is out already iCER
<7> wtf where have you been
<10> wtf
<0> It will be out around the time Vista is out.
<6> iCER: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/servicepacks.mspx
<10> im reading jet
<6> and now you know
<10> cheers
<12> last I heard sp 10 was comming out soon
<7> damn the camera on trhe right is way better then the one on the left
<8> I read a knowledge base article the other day telling me the behavior of Windows 2000 DNS Subnet Ordering changed in Windows 2000 SP5
<8> this was a 11-05 kb article
<7> lol
<0> The text was probably written before they decided to call it a "rollup."
<0> Speaking of which, there's a rollup for a rollup somewhere.
<7> you know what i hate
<8> Windows update -> install .NET 1.1
<8> Reboot
<6> or the sp5 code is written and waiting for the rest of sp5
<8> Windows update -> Install .NET 1.1 SP1
<7> people running nt4
<7> FKnight`, doesn't require a reboot
<8> why don't they just install the latest first ?
<0> FK: I keep wondering that.
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#debian
#politics
disney zippa de do da
#beginner
#red
boootuzzi
#narcotics
#beginner
jackassone
#unixhelp
|
|