| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
Comments:
<0> you doing bgp?
<1> If you have 1GB of RAM, yo uhave to have at least 1GB free on your C: drive.
<2> no
<3> i just formatted rworks...space is something i have plenty of
<1> And you really should have a lot more.
<4> standard IP links
<1> Then I dunno.
<3> i got 512 ram and more than 20 gigs free...
<4> bgp is a different animal
<0> do they all go to the same place?
<1> Did you **** up the permissions?
<2> just policy routing
<0> on your side?
<1> God damn.
<1> Cats are the laziest animals on the planet.
<3> crap i dont want to have to format again :(
<2> I got mail server's in my PIX's DMZ that are accessible via one ISP, and everything else is accessible via the other ISP
<0> or do they terminate at different locations?
<5> Blocked 624
<4> FKnight`: defining policy routing -- an example of this is routing based on source address. pix can't do this, but it can route destination traffic out destination interfaces
<4> think windows ' Route comand
<5> System Load:
<5>
<5>
<5> 8%
<5>
<5> woah
<0> PIXs dont route :p
<5> YES THEY DO
<1> digidog: Do you do DFS at work?
<5> stupid
<5> tac
<5> yes rworks
<5> but not as well as id like
<1> Do you do replicated DFS links?
<5> im supposed to restructure it sometime this year
<5> no
<1> Ah.
<5> er are very centralized
<5> citrix
<5> so only one dfs server
<1> See, I'm thinking about setting up a dedicated VLAN that our file servers can use just for replication traffic.
<5> we only have one file server
<5> thanks to sharepoint
<1> Just wondering if you've ever tried anything like that.
<1> Or heard of it.
<5> our fileserver only does home folders and roaming profiles
<5> but yeah rworks i have
<0> openvnc
<0> ugh....
<5> thats common in really large FS environments
<1> Ueaj/
<0> taping at 11am
<1> Yeah.
<0> better try to get a few hours sleep
<0> outte
<1> I've had a hard time finding discussions about it.
<6> i fired up openVPN the other day, thats pretty slick. ssl-vpn, does tunneled routing over a simple UDP or TCP connection.
<4> openvpn is the ****ness.
<1> peerce: We're about to purchase a Juniper SSL VPN at work.
<4> too bad windows doesn't have a native client
<5> because its not practical unless you are using a ****ton of shared files
<2> sartan: my IOS router is connected to AT&T DSL and Roadrunner cable. isp interface at the router is determined based on what the protocol and source is (for outbound), and inboound, we have services we want accessible via roadrunner, and some via DSL. This all has to be NATed as well. I'd rather have my PIX behind that ROUTER, which is ROUTING (and since it's routing between different ISPs, and making decisions, it NEEDS to be in charge of NAT), and fur
<4> Yikes lots of typing to read.
<6> rworks; thats what we use at a corporate level. I needed a funky VPN for a internal use.
<1> Yeah.
<1> I considered OpenVPN.
<2> so that's why I NAT on IOS in FRONT of the pix
<1> But there isn't a Windows client for it that isn't ****.
<5> no sharepoint rworks?
<4> FKnight`: 'and furt'
<4> FKnight`: there are a few ways that kind of situation can be deployed
<1> digiwork: We are homefully going to implement Sharepoint this year.
<6> rworks; the windows client is working OK for me.
<2> ".. and furthermore, it makes it a lot easier to configure my firewall, if I only have to think about what I'm blocking or allowing without having to worry about how it's being NATted since that's already being handled."
<4> routers in front makes sense.
<5> itll save you pain on the FS issue
<6> but I don't think its ready for enterprise use.
<1> But I *hope* I won't be involved with that much.
<1> :)
<5> heh
<6> anyways, zzzzzzz time for me
<1> Other than us making sure the servers work properly.
<5> its probably better to wait for WSS 3
<2> also
<5> it should be out soon
<1> Of course, that won't be the case, cause the guy in operations who is in charge of the project is a major slacker.
<2> if I need to manually failover if one of my connections goes down
<2> I'm gonna have a lot easier of a ime
<1> And I just know some of it's gonna fall to me. :(
<5> heh
<5> its fun!
<2> I won't have to TOUCH my pix
<1> digiwork: It's fun when you have time.
<1> Our whole group has been pushing so hard the last few months.
<5> see
<5> the point is to spend the time up front to save it later
<5> i know thats a dream
<1> Oh yeah.
<5> but its coming to fruition for us
<1> We will use an integrator to help us with the design.
<5> the HARDEST part is training
<1> You heard of ISI?
<5> nope
<4> isis
<1> Local business app integrator.
<2> my final thought though on this is this: I don't care who invented NAT. It's a router's job.
<2> I like my INTERNAL addresses to start -- oh I don't know, where my internal network STARTS
<1> http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jhtml;jsessionid=NWMQSKPAAOHWGCWMEAPSFEY?whoistoken=0&imageKeyPage=/whois/entry.jhtml&_requestid=284172
<1> Ahahahaha
<2> not halfway in
<1> check that out.
<1> If it works.
<1> Just noticed the URL has a session ID.
<1> Morons.
<2> just because NAT has the *****SIDE AFFECT ****** of hiding everything
<2> doesn't make it a firewall's job
<1> Session IDs shouldn't be p***ed in URLs unless the client refuses cookies!
<7> rworks, microsoft whois?
<4> hawkeye's telephoto eye for the straight guy.
<1> Ted|Lap: Yeah.l
<1> I like the "Certified Offer Service" thing
<1> "Make an offer for this domain"
<4> i wonder what iptables should be cl***ified as
<1> Har!
<7> haha
<7> i'm gonna make a $10 offer
<7> heh
<1> I'm gonna offer $11.
<1> And you'll be ****ed!
<7> damnit dude, you'll get it too, i'm sure
<7> 11 bucks
<7> i should offer one miiiilllliiiion dollars
<1> I'll offer One Million and One!
<2> moved to the media center PC four feet from my other computer so I could remote in, because the wireless keyboard on my other box is dropping letters.
<2> piece of crap
<2> it's a ****ing Microsoft wireless keyboard too
<2> not a cheapo
<8> FK, low battery?
<2> no
<2> it just ****s
<4> im having troubles with microsoft wireless
<4> ****s.
<4> the mouse even drops clicks
<2> yeah
<7> well, i read on slashdot that if you use linux wireless, it'll work and be more secure, because its open source y'know
<8> Smart ***
<7> well, c'mon M$ wireless ****s
<2> Microsoft should be broken up into six companies becuase they added "F Lock"
<4> microsoft ****ed up the home/end/ins/del/pageup/pagedown keys.
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
wks days hrs mins secs mirc
Ron Jeremy + accused + Ginger Lynn
#solaris
#beginner
Ne-Yo - Maybe I vertaling
gentoo kernel config uri:
#online
#politics
tcl scripts nforce
#mirc
|
|