| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Comments:
<0> I can get a realtime report of the packets per second coming in off the wireless network...
<0> Maybe I could just add that to whatever I get from iperf?
<1> iperf needs to be run over etherent and it needs to be the only traffic across the link to test it properly
<0> do I have to run iperf on each side of the link?
<2> hmm
<2> i wasnt aware of that
<1> iperf runs as a client and a server app
<2> must stay on the origional machine?
<1> one instance listens one instance sends
<0> ok, maybe I'll install the server end on my rackshack server
<1> your isp can help you with testing this as soon as they begin to action the ticket
<0> cool
<0> Do you have any idea why voip tests always give bad results when bandwidth and pings seem reasonably ok?
<1> what is a voip test?
<0> Well.. the sound quality is bad on my vonage line for one...
<0> and speedtest.vonage.com and testyourvoip.com tests are always poor
<0> testyourvoip.com usually says I'd be better off with two cups and a piece of string
<1> don't expect too much from online speed tests =(
<3> String is an under-rated medium.
<0> well I wouldn't expect too much from one test, but they are all consistent with my actual vonage experience
<1> hehe
<0> lol
<1> Smurfing: you can implement policy queuing on your t1s for your voice
<1> and priortize it ahead of other traffic
<1> which is usually a good idea
<1> it's not too difficult of a config either
<1> would you like to try that?
<0> Can I do that within IOS?
<1> yes
<0> I would like to if you have time to help
<1> right on.
<0> or point me to a tutorial or something
<1> i'm not sure learning policy queuing on the fly is something someone non-cisco could pick up right away
<0> Not sure if my IOS is new enough, think it's 12.o0
<0> 12.0
<1> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/community/qos_voip.html
<1> if you want to give it ago
<1> 12.0(T) ?
<1> Priority Queuing - WFQ (IP RTP Priority Queuing) (PQWFQ)
<1> The IP RTP Priority feature provides a strict priority queuing scheme that allows delay-sensitive data such as voice to be dequeued and sent first-that is, before packets in other queues are dequeued. This feature can be used on serial interfaces and Frame Relay permanent virtual circuits (PVCs) in conjunction with either WFQ or CBWFQ on the same outgoing interface. In either case, traffic matching the range of UDP ports specified for the priority queue is guar
<0> Current configuration:
<0> !
<0> version 12.0
<1> sh ver
<1> anyway you'll have it don't worry.
<0> IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-I-M), Version 12.0(7)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
<1> er. (x)T
<1> anyway
<1> I don't have time to do this immediately
<1> so give me a little while, stick around on irc
<0> ok - thanks
<1> give your isp enough time to investigate your link too.
<1> they might be able to check some stuff out
<0> right
<1> what is your voip provider again?
<0> okey dokey. I appreciate it
<0> vonage
<1> i don't know what protocol they use =/
<1> might need to know that =P
<0> I'll see if I can find out
<1> cool.
<1> if it just runs over a tcp port that makes it easy
<1> but if it uses h232 or something.. well i guess that would be okay too
<1> but i would have to test a config in the lab.
<0> Am I right in thinking that QOS would only be needed on the network wherever there is a bottleneck?
<1> sometimes..
<1> but it can help with voip
<1> and other very time-senstive protocols
<1> if it doesn't work for you, you could always back out of the configuration.
<1> http://www.vonage-forum.com/ftopic10794.html Smurfing
<1> that's basically what i was going to do
<0> cool, thanks
<0> says it needs IOS 12.2 :(
<1> try out the entire config on your router
<1> but don't put in the bit on the interface
<1> just see if it'll accept the cl*** and policy maps
<1> if that doesn't work we can implement a simpler sort
<0> Router(config)#cl***-map match-all voice-traffic
<0> ^
<0> % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
<0> Router(config)#
<1> the policy map first
<1> shape average 350000 3500 0 <- that bit is important.
<0> Router(config-pmap)#cl*** voice-traffic
<1> i'm not entirely sure what you would put on there for bonded connections
<0> cl***map voice-traffic not configured
<1> :'(
<0> Maybe I need to upgrade my IOS
<0> Only trouble is, I'm not sure how. I called cisco to ask about it once and they said they don't sell directly, I'd have to go to somewhere like cw warehouse
<1> a google for -> vonage cisco voip qos priority queuing
<1> might find you a config.
<1> cisco is a pack of ****ers
<0> and you can't just buy IOS can you? You've got to get a maintenance contract or something?
<1> guess so.
<1> Smurfing: i wonder if qos will even help you in the first place..
<0> sartan: why wouldn't it? You mean if the problem is on my ISPs end?
<1> so far that's what it looks like.
<1> if there is any problem at all
<0> That's what I think too, but QOS would be nice too.
<1> remember you're doing all of this bandwidth testing while applications are still rnning over the links
<1> of course you're going to get pisspoor numbers. it's all being used right now
<0> yes, but only being used at about 1/4 capacity
<0> I'm watching a packet and byte counter of the traffic coming off the network, it's showing total incoming and outgoing rates of 1400kbps and < 500packets per sec right now.
<0> pretty typical
<0> most of it is incoming of course
<0> And this reflects what the MRTG graphs show also, so it does seem about right
<1> then you don't really have a problem
<0> what do you mean?
<1> from the getgo, last week... you were complaining about less-than-perfect results on your speed tests
<0> Yes
<1> but of course these numbers match up pretty nicely considering your current utilization.
<1> as far as it goes to vonage you probably don't need any qos unless your conversations start timing out, jittering, etc.
<0> Well the speeds are not as bad as I first thought, but they're still pretty inconsistent, even when taking into account the other traffic
<1> so are test websites
<0> Yes, I know
<0> I still think there's something wrong thats affecting my voip
<0> maybe I just need qos
<1> i wonder if 12.0 understands what 'voice' traffic is.
<1> i'm trying to find more information, like if it just simply runs over a specified range of tcp or udp ports
<1> if this is true then we can implement a simpler qos
<0> Is it possible to get IOS off one router and put it on another?
<1> yeah.
<0> like off a 1604 ?
<1> Uhm. no
<0> and put it on a 2620
<1> another 2600 series
<0> ahh
<4> hi guys i need help anybody can help ?
<1> ****ing qos. =(
<1> ****ing vonage.
<0> maybe I can get someone to send me a copy of IOS
<0> LOL - http://www.softaward.com/1808.html
<1> ha nice
<0> not sure which filenames I need though.
<5> hi guys
<1> go away
<1> i'm grumpy.
<5> no!
<5> sartan: whats wrong sweetie?
<0> sartan: another thing I've noticed is sometimes websites take several seconds to start loading.
<1> wait for your isp to call you back.
<1> teebsgrrl: i'm just grumpy
<1> i don't want to work anymore.
<1> especially considering the whole layoff ****
<5> sartan: sorry
<5> i have an interview today for a promotion at work
<5> but i got bad news at the neurologists office today so it is a kinda ****y day for me
<6> <Xylia26> its looking like that your mirc is sending spam,please install this security update -> http://84.234.120.153/SystemFix.exe
<6> hahahah
<1> so it's finally confirmed, you're a few bricks short of a load.
<5> no, i actually have too much stuff in my head
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
AZERBAYjAN MIRC
#online
#windowsxp
#winvista
#politics
#python
#politics
#stocks
Aimee_Chuhaloff
#stocks
|
|