| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
Comments:
<0> but if you think it's going to make your PC better because it has more bits, that's kind of silly. :)
<1> win2003 server is available 64bit
<2> well lets not get carried waay ;)
<3> Rascal 2003 Server 64bit I think'
<2> OK
<0> yeah I get like 150-200FPS in hl2 with my GS. But i have an opteron 148 @ 2.8ghz to boot. :D
<3> Vista will be 32bit and 64bit
<2> I just wanna play the latest games
<3> WinXP Pro is enough
<0> you don't need windowx x64 for the latest games
<2> and since apps are moving toward 64 bit anyway
<3> what gfx card you have
<2> lol the big 6800 GT
<1> ok, a OEM Seagate 100GB laptop internal drive is $166 from your 'chief value' place, so if you get the seagate branded retail external 2.5" 100GB for $199 its only $34 more
<3> nerp thats nothing. I have my P4 3.0 running at 3.8GHz
<3> :D
<2> really expensive
<0> fatal - mine is still faster. :)
<3> 6800 is fine
<3> lol
<3> dual core.
<2> :D
<2> it will be soon
<2> I hope
<0> so?
<3> dual core is cool for graphic stuff
<0> for games, single threaded is still the way to go. :)
<3> yeap
<0> that's why I get 200FPS in hl2 and you get 100. :D
<3> HT is enough for me
<3> but since I do motion graphics I need to update my office PC
<3> I said LIKE
<3> havent seen it
<0> yeah see I don't do much of that. I have a laptop to write and do email and that's all I really need as far as productivity
<3> but its smooth as silk
<3> what was the code to see the FPS?
<2> Right then so I'll go buy pro x64... What do I do just set the BIOS to boot from the CD Drive and then the installation will automatically format the drive for me?
<0> cl_showfps 1
<3> cool will try
<4> cool
<3> but running at 1680x1050 all max with 8X AA
<2> Because atm I have xp Pro yes but its completely screwed as we were talking about 5 hrs ago
<0> it's cool, my bios and **** supports booting off an external USB cd rom
<0> very convenient
<3> Rascal, reinstall?
<3> nice
<3> mine too
<3> :D
<2> lol can't
<4> do you guys think i can run civ 4 on my computer.... 1.3ghz celeron 768 ram, 64 vid shared
<3> Why not rascal?
<5> Rascal999 - if you own xp pro, I belive you can "trade up" to xp64. Or you could, don't know if the offer is still valid from MS
<2> the pirated disc I borrowed I had to give back two days ago
<2> or it was yesterday
<3> lol
<5> oh, than the offer is certainly not valid
<3> what were you using before?
<3> Windows 98SE?
<2> no this version of windows is screwed
<2> lol
<2> no this is the only version of windows this new comp has ever seen
<3> Im using 1 legit version and 2 non legit
<2> but on my old computer I had windows hom
<2> *home
<3> peerce will ban me if Italk more
<2> lolo
<3> but who doesnt use illegal discs
<3> WinHome is fine for you
<2> Buy from MS they rip you of and take 6 weeks to deliver cds yay!!!
<3> unless you want more advanced networking and dual proc support
<3> Vista was bloated
<5> "was"?
<3> tried it the other day, just removed it and snapped the DVDR in half
<5> it's not even out yet
<3> IS
<0> vista is going to be seamless 64/32 bit, right? like, there won't be two versions?
<1> vista is still in early beta
<2> haaaaaaay
<2> I could download vista?
<0> like, you install vista nad vista is vista, and if an app is 64 bit and you have 64 bit hardware it will run, and vice versa?
<3> its garbage, even at beta2
<1> nerp; i doub that...by the time it comes out, they will probably DROP 32bit support entirely.
<0> i see
<5> I have no clue who the **** |FATAL| is, but I already think he's a ****ing moron
<3> nerp its 2 versions
<1> as it won't be for last years computers, ti will be for NEXT years.
<2> technology just moves too fast don't it
<2> it'll be 128bit soon
<0> naa.
<0> there are still people happily getting by with 5 year old machines
<3> technically I have a really good computer
<3> what does it want? 4 gigs of ram?
<2> you reckon? I think they will get up to 512bit with then next 10 odd years proabably less
<3> P5 6.0Ghz?
<2> I have 4g of ram :D
<3> Thats nice, but what for?
<5> Rascal999 - why would you think that? we've been on the i386 "32-bit" architecture for well over a decade
<0> people made XP sound like it wouldn't run on anything but top of the line gear and it works on even very basic hardware
<3> XP Pro is pretty good
<3> just security wise it ****s as
<3> ****
<2> I can't even install SP2 on this piece of crap! ahh
<0> I wish the serach puppy was more vividly animated. :(
<3> rascal: get a better version ;)
<3> slipstreamed with SP2
<1> Rascal999; ya know, you might have a hardware problem
<1> !info MEMTEST
<0> XP is fine security wise. It's the users who are the security problems
<1> that can make for cab file errors and stuff
<3> yeah it might be...my other cheap PC crashes itself...memory
<0> besides, the average end user can secure a windows box a lot easier than a linux box
<2> lol peerce shut up!!! I have no hardware problems with this new computer that I paid rip price for
<0> no hardware problems?
<3> nerp true.
<5> but you can't install sp2 on it? you've obviously got some sort of problem
<0> did you run memtest?
<3> MacOSX wins XP over with security though
<0> !info memtest
<2> yeah
<2> I've been readying
<3> Ive used MacOSX alot
<5> umm
<0> FATAL - macOS has plenty of vulnerabilities
<3> its pretty good
<5> wrong again, jack***
<3> Yes it does, but XP is a bigger target
<0> and many people run their macs with no consideraiton they might get owned. they've been lulled into a false sense of security
<5> on a per user basis, the security flaws on osx are at a much larger ratio than xp
<3> BBS my testicles are big. Want a bite?
<3> ;)
<0> all it will take is one big fast moving work to **** up a bunch of macos
<0> worm
<0> not work
<2> wtf? I've been READING that I had permissions set incorrectly for admins on the keys in the registry but I changed up all and tried to run sp2 and it still said 'Access Denied' when it came to writing the new reg...
<3> Whatsup with OPs acting like gods? comeone now. Be more humble
<5> so while you may say xp is a bigger target so it should have more vulnerabilities, your argument doesn't hold water considering the amount of osx vulnerabilities compared to their userbase
<2> Ouch? What did he do
<0> hehe be wary of the man who tells you to be humble
<5> and frankly, Apple's "pay us $100 for a yearly update" thing is absurd
<5> he's a ****ing moron, that's what he did
<5> ****. xp came out in what, end of 2002? it's 2006, haven't had to pay for an update
<5> apple hits you up yearly
<5> and no one is devising some money-oriented nickname like "M$" for them
<6> you're not required to update
<5> sure, but then you're vulnerable to future security holes
<0> umm why would you want to not update an OS?
<0> that's rediculous
<5> at lease MS releases that **** free
<5> least
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#computers
#computers
#windows
doesn't match address family inet6
#stocks
#linuxhelp
#worldcup
wakeme up bevore you go go
berettaextreme2
#nhl
|
|