| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Comments:
<0> FKnight`: I'm out of weed too :(
<1> half an hour later they notice all the laptops are gone
<2> This week will not ****ing let up
<3> our cleaning people have to have card keys to get into the office areas
<2> and the ****ed up part is
<1> so did this building.
<2> I quit cigarettes Sunday
<2> so this week has been especially annoying
<2> so
<2> 1) Quit smoking cigarettes
<2> 2) Low on weed
<1> so he probably had cutters in the bin and a stolen ID ot whatever
<2> 3) Number 1 cause throat and lungs to clean up, resulting in:
<1> got in got out wiht a bin full of thinkpads =)
<2> 4) Me coughing out precious little weed smoke
<4> whats a good way to scan my ports?
<3> nmap
<3> from an outsided shell account
<2> NAH MAN
<2> USE SHIELDS UP
<2> !
<3> ahahaahaha
<2> by GRC
<2> j/k :D
<3> !info GRC
<2> dude that vulnerability scanner steve gibson has. When it first came out, it wouldn't verify whether it was really your IP or not.
<2> so you could portscan everyone
<2> from grc.com
<3> steve is such a twatbook
<2> but see
<4> hahaah
<2> he knows how **** works
<3> yeah, drum up a little fear, its good for business
<2> well
<2> he knows cryptography, networking, VPNs, software, programming
<2> how could he be so smart yet so stupid at the same time
<4> where do i scan my ip ?
<3> hey, works for all those pricks in washington!
<2> peerafk tre
<2> *tre
<3> Carlo__; from a shell account, using nmap, I told you
<2> he was right about Raw S0cketz though
<2> he
<4> Peer no idea what you mean
<2> he's making a big thing now cause 802.11 Ethernet doesn't have security.
<2> e.g. anyone can spoof a dhcp server, do arp spoofing, etc.
<2> and that's kinda true
<5> im about to spoof some taco bell
<2> You know what I don't get. "Authorizing" a DHCP server in Windows 2000/2003.
<3> so he's gonna invevnt a better ethernet? snicker.
<2> How do you keep a client from getting config from a rogue dhcp server?
<5> it wont auth if its not part of the AD
<5> domain
<2> how does it know what's in the domain if it doesn't even have IP yet?
<5> well thats a different funciton
<2> If I'm a DHCP client, how do I know the DHCP server is authorized to service me if I'm just now getting my IP and DNS settings?
<2> I can't check AD yet
<5> well its either joined or it isnt
<3> i ***ume the auth relates to the dhcp being able to register you in DNS
<2> pardon me for paying attention to the OSI layer. ...
<2> but I thought AD was somewhere around 4 and 5
<2> DHCP at 2 and 3
<5> but the client knows if its aprt of the domain prior to anything happening
<2> right.
<2> but we're authorizing the dhcp SERVER
<2> what's to stop my Evil DHCP Server from pretending it's on the domain ?
<2> especially to a printer
<5> DHCP servers running Windows Server 2003 are verified as authorized in Active Directory before they can service clients.
<6> it can't pretend. it needs an Administrator account in order to be joined TO the network. once it's connected then clients are checked against AD
<2> What stops the DHCP server from not answering DISCOVER request?
<6> damn you digi :) speed typist
<5> if its not authorized against AD it wont service ****
<2> ok, if I set up ISC bind
<2> I mean ISC DHCP
<5> you ahve to manually point the client there
<2> my DHCP server can give two ****s whether it's authorized by a Windows server or not
<2> it's going to answer DISCOVER requests
<5> ok but the thought is
<5> how is the ISC server going to get on your network?
<6> what does DISCOVER call and DOMAIN ACCESS have to do with each other?
<5> you dont already have DHCP?
<2> well isn't the point of "authorizing a DHCP server" contingent upon the possibility that someone might sneak one on the network?
<2> pgpkeys: The more correct question is, what does domain access have to do with DHCP
<5> but if a DHCP server that is already authed to AD
<6> no, it's the other way around.
<5> you can put as many rouge servers as you want on
<5> it wont serve the clients
<3> rogue
<2> why won't it ?
<5> because the windows XP machine knows to look first for the AD DHCP AUTH server
<2> is ISC DHCP gonna ask the Windows server for permission to service clients?
<5> there is a stepping process
<2> oh okay
<5> IF
<5> it is part of the domain
<2> so AD clients have special code in there to do all that ****
<5> i dont know what happens if it is not
<5> that is a good qustion
<5> yes fk
<2> so, printers and switches
<5> different story
<2> they're vulnerable to rogue dhcp servers
<5> well not if they are already leased
<5> the wont switch until the lease expires
<2> or reserved
<5> then its a fight
<2> if I can own the switch
<2> I can sniff the network
<5> i can find a way to introduce a rouge http proxy server inside the lan as well
<5> keep people with servers out of the front door :)
<2> well yeah
<2> dude
<2> pretty soon
<2> you can sneak a whole rogue network in on your keychain
<5> haha
<2> and you won't have to plug it in :D
<2> hahahahahah
<5> bluetooth hacked?
<2> or ****ty wifi security on the lan :D
<2> you could ARP spoof though too
<2> and position between client and router
<6> well to be honest, if systems and devices were infallible.. you wouldn't need admins or secteams :)
<2> pgpkeys yeah
<2> that's why we're here
<2> heheh
<6> i hope they neer find a way to eliminate every hole bug or problem. Lief would be so damn boring! And we'd be out paychecks
<6> s/Lief/Life/g
<2> some bugs are just stupid though.
<2> I still can't save a VS.NET project to an IIS server without going via Frontpage
<5> fk
<5> visual web developer
<5> 2005
<6> uhhh
<6> FKnight`: dude, vs and vwd both support ftp
<5> ftp ****s
<6> true, but til i can integrate scp .. ;)
<6> or sftp :)
<5> i dont want it to that either
<2> ok so I've been hearing all these crazy *** rumors that Microsoft is going to start to slowly put VB.NET out to pasture.
<6> you prefer fp extensions??
<5> nope
<5> i prefer SPS
<2> or moving it more toward just VBA ****
<5> so i can version control ****
<6> FKnight`: heheh there'd be a lot of pissed off companies if they did that
<6> digidog: ahh, I use VSS for that (though personally I prefer either cvs or svn)
<7> how does youtube support itself, the bandwith etc
<5> VSS is static.. well it WAS
<5> in vs.net 2005 its dynamic
<5> which rocks
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
imoot mp3
#linux-noob
#politics
c.ronaoldo
#linux-noob
#freebsd
#debian
#stocks
msn messenger has made several failed
MOO Version mIRC
|
|