| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Comments:
<Joe-7> being up front with people is sometimes good
<Joe-7> I guess
<Joe-7> and then a quick change of subject insures that awkwardness is gone hah
<LordX> I got a new proc and new ram.. thats why I was worried
<LordX> essentially a new comp
<Joe-7> !infomod Joe-7 Joe-7? Oh yeah that guy... he is a loser. He can't get girls either... DOUBLE LOSER.
<BadtzMaru> no
<BadtzMaru> new CPU+ram != essentially new comp to the activation stuff
<LordX> right
<BadtzMaru> i believe mobo is much more important
<Smurfing> Peerce: 348Mb file copied via SAMBA from a FreeBSD file server to a windows machine through a 10/100 switch.. takes 58 seconds
<peerce> LordX; new CPU in the same motherboard? no difference.
<peerce> Smurfing; ok, how many megabyte/sec is that?
<LordX> but new MOBO can make a diff?
<Smurfing> About 60?
<peerce> WAIT, I told you 3 times, SMB file sharing is SLOW, use FTP
<BadtzMaru> SMB = ****y
<BadtzMaru> ftp is best for speedtet
<peerce> SMB has WAY more protocol overhead than FTP
<peerce> or http
<Smurfing> sorry, meant 60 mbps, not 60 mBps
<peerce> how are you calculating bits?
<peerce> 348 megabyte file, 58 seconds, I'm getting 6Mbyte/sec
<Smurfing> well, 8 bits in a byte plus overhead = about 10
<peerce> ok, so you're getting 60% wirespeed on a synchronous SMB transfer, thats damn good.
<Smurfing> it is?
<Smurfing> why is it so crap?
<peerce> huh?
<Smurfing> I mean what makes SMB so inefficient
<peerce> SMB is a synchronous protocol. 'get block' 'ok'.
<peerce> its a RPC file system API based thing.
<peerce> its not a streaming file transfer like FTP
<Smurfing> Ok... I'll have to do a bit of research to understand that.
<Smurfing> But I appreciate your help - I'll google it :)
<peerce> FTP simply opens a socket and jams the data down it.
<peerce> far closer to wire protocol speed
<amonfils> if you would like to test performance.
<amonfils> please got a proper tool.
<amonfils> iperf.
<amonfils> thanks drive through.
<amonfils> once you have that running at 90Mb/s+ then it is time to play with complicated protocols.
<Smurfing> peerce: what do you think I should get through FTP?
<peerce> can you use jumbo frames with SMB ?
<amonfils> please.
<amonfils> jumbo frames require gigabit typically.
<peerce> Smurfing; I generally see about 8-9Mbyte/sec between 100baseT servers on the same switch
<peerce> amonfils; oh? can't use that with 100baseT? is that just cuz the adapters don't support it?
<Smurfing> peerce: ok, I'll do a bit more testing. Thanks
<amonfils> adapters and switch.
<peerce> you're seeing 6 now, so you're not going to get THAT much faster.
<amonfils> http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf/
<amonfils> iperf.
<amonfils> your stock NLANR approved bit blasting testing tool.
<peerce> !infoadd FREE FREE IS WHEN YOU DON'T HAVE TO PAY FOR NOTHING OR DO NOTHING
<peerce> WE WANT TO BE FREE ... FREE AS THE WIND!
<peerce> !info free
<amonfils> your interface cards and switches need to know that the MTU is no longer 1500 bytes but 4k or 9k.
<z4M04> ooF
<amonfils> and it is free.
<peerce> !info FREE
<peerce> fawk, stupid bot
<amonfils> !info FREE
<amonfils> br0ked!
<z4M04> unF
<peerce> ****y california february weather... http://www.hogranch.com/digi-2006/2006-02-11/slides/IMG_5242.html (yesterday)
<peerce> http://www.hogranch.com/digi-2006/2006-02-11/slides/IMG_5207.html
<z4M04> um. northern california. kthx
<z4M04> stellar day down here. 80's and clear.
<peerce> yeah, it really ****s up here -> http://www.hogranch.com/digi-2006/2006-02-11/slides/IMG_5231.html
<peerce> it was 70s here today too. and clear
<amonfils> ****ed here too. only beat the snow fall record by .3"
<peerce> thats my kid on CFJ 10, with the blue vest
<z4M04> looks chilly
<peerce> man, I wished Id had the cam with me today... was out near Steamers Lane, and the boomers were coming in. 10 footers in sets of 3.
<Smurfing> I've got you right where you want me
<z4M04> this guy
<sAMOa> fag
<peerce> my doogie thought it was a nice day yesterday too. http://www.hogranch.com/digi-2006/2006-02-11/slides/IMG_5201.html
<peerce> of course, any day that has tennis ball chasing in it is a good day for doogie.
<z0g^> COOOL!!!!!!!!! My EFF t-shirt came in the mail today!
<peerce> electronic frontiers foundation ?
<z0g^> yeah something like that
<z0g^> I donated something like $65 and that donation level provided me a free t-shirt.
<z0g^> i think everything the EFF does is for the good of people like you and me, so there is no need to justify the donation.
<em0rox> anyone know a way to trick a program into thinking you have a faster cd-rom drive speed under windows 98se ?
<BadtzMaru> get a faster CD rom
<BadtzMaru> its genius
<em0rox> I don't have a cd rom drive installed peroid
<em0rox> thx
<em0rox> ;)
<BadtzMaru> suffer?
<em0rox> that does sound like fun
<z0g^> em0rox: perhaps rip the cd to an .iso or .nrg or whatever file, then use daemon tools to mount the file as if it were a drive.
<peerce> wait. if you don't have a cdrom at all, whats to trick?
<em0rox> daemon won't install on my system
<peerce> thats like, "I dont' have any wheels on my car... how can I trick it into going faster?"
<em0rox> windows 98
<em0rox> at least the version I tried to install
<peerce> if you've got no CD, whats it matter??!?
<em0rox> mounting?
<peerce> huh?
<peerce> flying?
<em0rox> sure
<peerce> whats that got to do with ANYthing ?
<peerce> if you've got no CD drive at all, what exactly is it you're 'tricking' ?!?
<peerce> take a crayon and write "52X" on your front panel.
<em0rox> ...
<amonfils> hahah
<amonfils> peerce with ROCK SOLID recommendation.
<amonfils> i like it.
<em0rox> more like rock solid brains
<em0rox> :/
<peerce> you've given us ZERO context here. you've got no CD drive, yet you want windows98 to think its faster.
<peerce> um, nothing times anything is still nothing.
<amonfils> i believe he's using daemon tools
<peerce> he said it wouldn't install
<amonfils> as a virtual cdrom
<peerce> so I dunno.
<amonfils> oh, fired. this is a dead-end thread.
<em0rox> guess peerce is also too dumb to notice a pm
<peerce> PM? unsolicited /QUERY's go straight to /dev/null here
<amonfils> what impetus does peerce have to answer you privately?
<amonfils> are you planning to fund his paypal account?
<em0rox> I never asked him to answer anything
<em0rox> thx
<BadtzMaru> like your PM's are important
<amonfils> i really need anti-irc medicine.
<em0rox> I was telling him the answer to his own questions
<amonfils> it makes me a bitter angory man.
<|emo|> wahtever fags
<BadtzMaru> DNP!!
<BadtzMaru> WOWOO
<amonfils> hahaha
<BadtzMaru> see
<BadtzMaru> I havent been corrupted yt
<BadtzMaru> I dont think about it
<BadtzMaru> heh
<peerce> em0rox on #Windows +#no-intro +#AcmeShells @#em0roms #segadc #[dc]chat #dc-chat @#sega-cd
<amonfils> i have a new /kill tag i've been dying to use.
<peerce> what a pile of freakazoid channels too.
<BadtzMaru> emo roms
<amonfils> hehhe, i made a fun.
<peerce> em0... oh, emulators. see, he gave us ZERO context for that ****
<BadtzMaru> is that like
<amonfils> /kill and 'dying'
<amonfils> heheh
<BadtzMaru> a game of kids being sad?
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux-noob
#windowsxp
#beginner
dable gpu
#nhl
welsh calnder
#firebird
no3ik blogurl:http://honeyalba.blogspot.com
/server au.austnet.org
#computers
|
|
