| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Comments:
<0> u ppl r teh snooz
<1> i am the pooZ
<1> - \|/
<1> - PooZ <\
<1> - \\__\|/
<1> - \___/
<1> - / \
<2> Anyone here use speedfan to automatically vary fan speeds?
<2> I find speedfan's thresholds for turning the fan on between max/min is very sensitive. At 29 degrees, the fan is at minimum, whereas at 30 degrees, the fan is on full...
<3> does anyone know if WinXP SP2 fully supports hyper-threading with duel CPU xenon?
<3> thats XP Pro
<3> anyone know a good, easy to use benchmarking util for windows?
<0> if you mean dual xeon, that's a waste. XP is for 1-2 CPUs and a single hyperthreaded CPU appears to windows as 2 CPUs. a dual xeon is server-cl*** hardware.
<3> its also pretty commen in the high-end graphics workstation area...which is what i got it for
<3> yeh, ive read that it only uses two cpus
<3> i just wasnt sure if those articles I read said that because they were all old (2002) and if MS had updated XP to recognize Four CPUS...Two Physical
<0> if they're non-HT xeons, then fine, XP will use the CPUs to their capacity.
<3> in my device manager its showing FOUR cpus
<0> no, and they're not going to. not sure how vista will handle that though.
<4> pizza, btw the dns issue i was describing before was caused by stupud Norton
<0> eh, maybe they built in enough virtualization logic for HT. shrug.
<0> norton is horrible. just about every machine i see that crap on has network issues.
<1> hey remember the internet maps that had the peering nocs and the speed of the connections are there still those maps?
<3> pizza: thats what im thinking. not sure. i just worried it may be doing something stupid and only using ONE of the processors and splitting it into four virtual cpus???
<5> does xp home support ht?
<0> no.
<3> no
<0> look in task manager, under performance tab, there should be 4 CPU graphs.
<5> yea
<3> yep, there is
<0> if there are then it's capable of picking up the 2 physical and 2 virtual HT CPUs.
<6> that's not right
<6> the virtual HT CPUs don't do anything
<6> AMD own intel
<0> put a cork in it.
<6> till Conroe comes out, then intel will reign once more
<3> pizza: so youd say its definitely using BOTH cpus in HT mode?
<3> pizza: its not just splittin ONE into four...or something?
<0> that's not possible.
<3> so 4 means it definititely IS using both
<6> remsh: don't be silly
<6> YES
<0> fire up a CPU-intensive program that's SMP-aware and all four graphs should show load.
<3> ok, ill try Maya
<6> do it now
<7> hmm is the only way to byp*** a proxy server for a specific address a group policy defining that for IE settings?
<7> basically id like to be able to have lan traffic go without using the proxy
<8> mess?
<7> yeah one big one
<8> a proxy is just a jump of point from a client/server
<8> like .... you -->proxy-->porn site
<7> hmm so id prolly just do it with routing then
<9> fellas, my usb keyboard works fine in bios.. but as soon as windows starts to boot, it stops responding to the keyboard. Anyone know why?
<8> so porn site sees proxy ip instead of you... but thats easly remedied'
<7> xlx: usb keyboard?
<8> xlx get drivers'
<7> yeah well ive got a proxy here
<8> ok mes ... so what do you want to do'
<7> but currently i dont have a way to split traffic without client side config
<9> alkatraz, i'm trying to set it up
<8> you are at a workstation and you are using IE and IE connects to a proxy .... what now?
<7> well not even that
<9> can't get into xp .. guess i'll just get another keyboard for now
<8> xlx follow insructions form usb keyboard'
<7> for instance, im using a 3rd party cert authority
<9> it's a viewsonic cheap keyboard.. no instructions
<10> what's multipart downloading?
<7> and when my dc boots up it needs to check the revocation of the cert
<8> torrents are a perfect example'
<8> tropic-Ll
<10> oh
<7> i dont want a firewall rule for the proxy
<10> DownloadThemAll for firefox has it
<9> actually, my bios reset .. made the keyboard disabled.. my mistake :)
<7> i want a firewall rule for the box
<10> it seems useless for dTa
<8> mes? i'm lost bro... you should start from you setup from A-z cuz i dont' havea clue of what you want or what you need or what the problem is ... andi'm a pretty good reader'
<7> ok
<7> for ldaps im using a 3rd party cert, so when booting my dc its going to check the cert authority on status of the certificate.
<7> the cert authority and the domain controller are on 2 different networks
<7> i want this traffic to not use the proxy
<11> thats not IE traffic, is it?
<7> no
<7> well its http traffic
<11> so why woud it use the IE proxy?
<7> i thought those settings were global
<7> but perhaps im incorrect
<6> MOFOs
<8> animals
<8> mes yeah did you set up IE to use a proxy?
<8> you confuzed the **** out of me... back to starcraft
<9> starcraft?
<9> is that still popular?
<7> yes i setup ie to use the proxy
<8> mes so disable it !
<8> rather un-set it up i guess would be the correct terminology
<8> xlx yes it is ... i run **** on bnet'
<8> run it meng!
<7> but what if i need other services to use the proxy?
<8> well then use a different browser i would say
<7> i just want internal traffic to not go to the proxy
<7> and am wondering if thats possible server side
<8> if you are using IE and you set up a proxy i dont' think there is a way to redirect traffic
<7> ok
<8> i mean a scrip i guess would work ...
<8> but dude just use a different browser... like firefox
<7> i could do it with a route i bet
<11> sounds like you should be doing this at a router level, not at a proxy level
<7> yeah
<7> thats what im starting to realize
<7> thanks guys
<8> i guess it would be a half *** fix to just use different browser...
<7> well
<7> im not even using a browser
<8> peerce do you know if you can set up IE to use a different proxy for each new window?
<8> is that possible?
<11> don't think so.
<11> i have no idea why hes using a proxy at all.
<8> yeah he lost me a while ago ...
<8> peerce but does windows let you do that ??
<8> well ie rather'
<11> i dont tink so, proxy is a global settinig
<7> peerce its not my choice
<7> different office
<7> ****ing admin is crazy
<8> burnthemutha'Down!!!
<8> find him and his home box throw in a sprikle of kiddy porn... call in a dash of feds and wammon good bye nazi admin'
<7> heh
<12> are there any newer utilities made for WinXP like the bootvis utility?
<13> Logged boot.
<12> ?
<12> for some reason, explorer has been locking up/crashing sometimes right on startup and I'm not sure why.. i don't think i've updated anything that would cause something like that in a while
<13> Maybe something at www.sysinternals.com has something clever (eg, boot logs) -- they're very inventive and well built from the ground up; cl*** A coder.
<11> WAG says its either flakey hardware (marginal ram, something like that) or a virus/spyware/trojan thing
<13> Now, to eat some food. *sigh* This is not going to be pretty. A big bite sauce of some scrambled eggs and pancakes or french toast.
<14> can windows 64 run win32 apps?
<15> Is there a way to block access to messenger in computers in a network, using ICS?
<16> sadif your router might can do it
<16> catseye yes
<15> i do not have a router, i want to do it only using ICS
<16> catseye but you'll need 64-bit drivers
<17> MSN is like a virus. Goood luck
<15> Any suggestions
<18> just set up deny rules for whatever port messenger uses in the firewall.
<15> allready did it and it still works
<17> it's sneaky.
<18> i'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that the rule is probably misconfigured.
<11> pale_blue; messenger keeps trying ports til it finds ones that work, includinng port 80
<19> barring being able to block ports, you can get all the IPs for MSN's IM servers
<19> and block outbound to those
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
211032 kern.error
#worldcup
moon anamolies
#delphi
#linux-noob
SM-Bus-Controller K7s41GX
#computers
#goal
slab city +brewing +closed
verizon fios pppoe auth
|
|