| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Comments:
<0> its time to get ill
<1> **** man.
<1> I can't thihk. :)
<2> mmm mochi ice cream
<3> the only real disadvantage to 64bit processing is larger binaries and thus higher memory consumption
<4> huh?
<0> well and the fact that driver support is almost non existent
<0> who needs video drivers
<4> castP00 is clearly non-informed.
<3> amonfils care to educate me on what the other disadvantages are cocerning the technolog
<5> so digi, am i retarded :(
<3> I'm not arguing OS driver support and such silly nonsense
<4> see digidog
<3> that will come with time
<4> see 64bit requiring an 'emulation' layer to run 32 bit
<3> I am talking about hte actual technology
<0> and actually
<0> right now it is premature
<4> and
<4> frankly.
<4> the driver bit is MORE than enough
<3> 64 bit processing is premature?
<4> sure it'll come with time.
<3> since when
<0> yes
<3> its been around since I was a child
<0> since right now you dumb ***
<0> we are talking about right now
<4> just as CPUs have matured "over time"
<0> and we are in #windows
<5> huh
<5> wait me?
<4> the concept of 64bit computing is fine.
<4> the concept of mainstream 64bit computing is broken.
<4> as it sits right now.
<4> vista will be the "jump" into mainstream 64bits.
<3> incomplete but hardly broken
<4> note: mainstream.
<4> you don't read.
<6> indeed, unless you're running applications that need over 4GB of address space for a single process, there's no real need for 64bit at present.
<4> if it doesn't work for the m***es, it is broken.
<6> data base servers, sure. large scale scientific calculation, sure. big EDA/CAD jobs, ditto.
<0> AUDIO
<4> specialized people who are surrounded by a team of "experts" generally do well with early technology that is "still baking". they understand why it doesn't work as expected and are willing to wait and deal.
<4> the m***es do not understand this and percieve it as broken.
<4> perception is often reality.
<4> see mob mentality.
<3> I never have concern about the m***es
<6> heck, we've been running Oracle in 64bit for about 6-8 years now at work on Sun Ultrasparc servers
<4> WHORacle
<6> 16+ GB ram, etc etc.
<5> oracle isn't mainstream
<0> the m***es make the decisions
<6> exactly.
<4> neither is sun.
<4> digidog knows.
<0> get with it or make your own planet
<3> digidog not in my field
<4> there's a reason CISCO BOUGHT LINKSYS
<4> there's a reason CISCO BOUGHT SCIENTIFIC ATLANTIC
<0> i dont know what your field is, but i bet you are somewhat dellusioned
<4> can you see "m***es"
<4> s,see,saw,
<4> ,saw,say,
<4> i'll get it right
<4> **** regexp!
<0> hasha
<3> digidog lets put it this way I am currently an intern to hire for a defense contractor the m***es cna kiss my ***
<4> asdlkfsadf
<4> intern
<0> and that thinking will keep you there
<4> BABY
<4> oh
<4> by the way
<4> because you are going to work for a "defense contractor"
<5> so digi, i failed?
<4> doesn't make you "special"
<4> even if you get "top secret clearance"
<0> boeing cares about the market
<4> just means you've chosen a "federal" route
<3> I never said amonfils I was simply stating that my occupation so that you have understanding of why I dont care about the m***es
<0> 53% gimp
<0> what is failure to you?
<3> if you took it as me attempting to feel special
<5> i dunno
<3> thats your own problem
<5> what's your average
<5> :P
<0> it not baout failure though
<4> zing!
<0> 30%?
<0> heh
<5> really?
<4> drunk, failure.
<5> that's pretty funny
<0> its not good
<4> i bet there's a lot of windows admin questions.
<5> amon, i'm double the basline, trashed
<4> i can't answer those.
<0> i get a lot of dictionary answers
<5> what does that say
<4> given everyone admin rights.
<4> done/done
<0> which is why i ask "decribe a practical application"
<4> that's my answer
<5> wait, which one was that
<4> up/up !
<5> did i miss that one
<0> VSS
<5> oh, nah i got that one
<4> source safe?
<0> nope
<5> no
<0> you just defined what it was
<0> 1/2
<5> shadow service
<0> not an application
<4> visual source safe! the microsoft answer to cvs!
<6> the DOD needs 64 bit powerpoint for their warroom presentations
<0> so i gave 1/2
<5> i said you could use it to easily restore versions withotu hitting tape
<0> amon
<0> vistual source safe is gone
<4> is it? :(
<5> well, and to backup files that are in use
<0> yes
<0> incorrect though
<0> well
<4> not a developer. wouldn't know.
<5> wtf else is it for then
<0> end user mistakes
<4> how many host bits in a /16 mask!
<4> ask me that!
<5> no **** digi
<0> using VSS for backups isnt a good idea unless the API supports it
<5> wtf does "recover previous versions" mean
<5> durrrrr
<4> incremental backups?
<4> h0 h0 h0 ! guesses!
<5> amon, realtime, on files
<5> digidog, backupexec supports it
<0> thats what it does
<0> however
<4> wow tape drives are busy writing my every keypress in word!
<5> digi realize, i've USED vss to recover user mistakes :P
<0> thats not a practical application.. "user X makes a mistake and saves over the document. VSS allows the end user to revert without IT intervention"
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
#worldcup
#computers
#worldcup
#computers
#delphi
#flash
dual core cpu not showing in task manager
Heterogeneous queries require the ANSI_NULLS and ANSI_WARNINGS options to be set
#politics
|
|