| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Comments:
<0> hehe sql server 2k5, 4 instance of visual studio :) ms word.. lots of explorer windows .. and bunch of other stuff
<0> I got three monitors all full of work stuff
<1> the sql server by itself can easily chew >1gig virtual
<0> yes
<1> so that's not strange
<1> sounds like your total may sometimes be much closer to your limit (4GB) and there's simply not enough overhead. Try increasing the size of the paging file minimums
<2> presumably you have sufficient disk space on the drive containing the pagefile
<0> I have it on system manage shouldn't windows automatically manage it ?
<1> word uses the heap manager quite a bit, and that has a "fill or kill" policy of sorts.... it cant always be bothered waiting for the system to grow the pagefiles
<0> I got 80gig free on the OS drive
<0> so what should I do ? take it off system manage ?
<1> so try running with a (say) 6GB pagefile for a while and see whether the errors continue
<0> and increase the minimum
<0> ok will do
<0> thanks :D
<1> np
<3> hi, is it possible in windows to make relative shortcuts (../a instead of C:\b\c\a if the shortcut file is located in C:\b\c\d)?
<1> tho you should really run the sql server on a dedicated box if its a production machine
<0> ok will set custom size initial size to 6gig and maximum size to 12gig
<1> sounds reasonable
<1> using /3gb or /va?
<0> . /va ?
<1> they're boot.ini switches that are sometimes used with sql (and other apps). dont worry. apparently you're not using them :)
<0> right
<4> anyone know of a guide to remove xp components from the install cd? i am trying to shrink a xp pro sp2 install.
<0> thanks again
<1> no probs
<5> i thought it was /userva
<5> anyways i'm stil asleep :)
<1> you're right. its /userva
<6> tech support, mmMmMmMmMmm
<6> so many script companies are getting rich from good tech support
<5> H2SO4 - that op lock suggestion you gave me about two 1/2 weeks ago was a disaster
<5> H2SO4 - but what was learned from that == $$$$$$$$$$
<5> no skin off my nose :)
<1> toor: what did I suggest?
<5> disable oplocking
<5> for a machine showing poor performance to machines access shares with flat files
<1> lol, no, that was gimp-work (from memory). I was the one saying that oplocks were A Good Thing.
<5> yeah gimp was trying to help me :)
<5> i have a 2 node active/active cluster with 8 terminal servers accessing flat files
<5> 'all of a sudden' **** went to hell
<1> the way to troubleshoot those issues is with a packet sniffer trace
<5> yeah
<5> on the network side stuff was golden
<5> we had Cisco, Dell, EMC, Microsoft looking at our setup
<5> **** hsould have been flying
<5> what it came down to is
<4> how do i setup up group poilicy on the xp install disk (pre-install)?
<5> Intel NIC drivers and Windows Load Balancing Services not working with Cisco IOS 12.3 PagP configuration as a trunk between another switch and how our application accesses those flat files
<1> ****ing cisco switching gear always has issues with NLB
<5> yep
<5> NLB is a hack though
<1> replace it with a $40 switch and its all good :)
<5> haha
<1> I reckon NLB is pure genius. Simple and bulleproof.
<5> its a bastard child mix of layer 2 and 3 load balancing
<1> still, I imagine the symptoms would not have been easy to troubleshoot
<5> not at all
<5> very frustrating
<1> it actually balances on layers 3 or 4
<5> it touches layer 2
<5> and thats where the damage is at
<1> 'single' affinity or 'none'
<1> it masks the source MAC to make the switch flood its ports, which is what the #$%^& Cisco kit doesn't like
<5> the cluster VIP changes all the mac address' to the vmac for the interfaces of the actual IP on the machine
<5> do this on a switch
<1> but it cant balance based on anything on layer 2
<5> ping the machines actual ip
<5> then show ip arp
<5> you will see the IP with the vmac
<5> H2SO4 - nods
<1> were you running NLB on the MSCS boxes?
<5> no
<1> ok
<5> terminal servers
<1> right
<1> multicast mode?
<5> it was
<5> in trouble shooting i brought it to unicast
<1> yeah, that has a better chance of working with cisco kit
<5> nods
<1> they dont like the unicast-IP-with-multicast-MAC thing, even though its utterly a-OK, RFC-wise. Had this argument with them ad nauseum.
<7> If someone burns a CD or a DVD at a certain speed, is that the speed at which you're limited when you read it? I've been wondering about that
<1> owensdj: no
<7> ohh ok. didn't think so
<5> H2SO4 - nods
<5> i'd rather have it on the multicast level but its working alright right now as unicast :)
<5> if it aint broke don't fix it!
<1> toor: the only real loss with unicast is the inability for the cluster nodes to talk to each other thru the cluster-bound interface. If that's not an issue, unicast is usually perfectly fine.
<5> the cluster and the terminal servers NLB config are on seperate VLANs
<5> so going back to multicast won't bothoer the MSCS boxes its just i have to change it :)
<1> sorry. Meant "cluster" as in "NLB cluster" in this instance. Good on MS for using the same terminology for two such frequently-confused products :)
<5> nods
<8> I thought Digi was talking about "Web Storage System" for 6 months every time he'd say "WSS"
<8> because that's what WSS used to stand for in Exchange
<8> now it's "Windows Sharepoint Services"
<1> gotta love terminology recycling
<9> anyone have any good or bad to say about trend micro anti-spyware enterprise?
<10> gotta love that 644KBps transfer. go comcast.
<10> especially when for a short bit, also had a 500KBps also going.
<10> hmm. steady over 700 now? what the hell speed they giving me these days, anyway? wdf
<11> http://managedtasks.com/wpthemes/blog/wp-content/themes/reflections/images/reflections.jpg
<11> what sorta drawing/picture is that?
<10> whoa. I never got speedtest results at 7239kbps before. comcast must have raised speeds again or something
<12> Are there any popular auctions sites besides Ebay? Does anyone happen to know where I could buy a dual 17" bloomberg flat panel monitor? I was able to get one pair on ebay but I need another set... having a hard time finding one
<11> http://thismight.be/offensive/images/picpile/u%20have%20such%20pretty%20BWAHH.gif <-- hahhaahhahahaha
<10> ahaha 8508 that time. never got more than 4900 in the past
<10> god I wish there was more **** I wanted
<7> Barsky so you have everything you want? :)
<10> mmm new vmware client console beta seems way faster than previous build (for vmware server)
<10> owensdj: not at all. but there's not much to download I want
<13> wonder if our maternity leave policy demands that someone leave
<10> OMG> CSM IS PREGNANT
<13> hehehe
<13> no
<13> however someone in our office is... and... well..... SHE NEED TO GO
<13> nawh
<11> hahaha
<10> csm knocked her up just to get her out of the office for a couple months ;-)
<13> ohhhh no no no
<13> i wouldnt even with your ****
<13> :D
<13> i'm glad someone did though
<13> cuz
<13> she need to go
<10> Westinghouse 42" 1080p LCD HD Monitor $1500
<10> put that baby at your desk ;-)
<10> what mean Ciw?
<10> that a game?
<14> OOOH GAAAOOOWD.
<10> kak?
<10> mouth?
<14> Kaka.
<13> 42" 1080p for 1500?
<10> yeah
<13> where?
<10> westinghouse. pretty ugly unit
<10> sec
<13> who cares for 1500 bucks :p
<7> Is anybody using 1080p yet?
<10> http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=7699163&type=product&id=1138084694260
<10> well yeah
<10> not really. I also just read how most of these 1080p TVs accept 1080p then downconvert them to 720p or 1080i by the time they get to the screen :)
<7> so they can't actually do progressive?
<10> 720PPPPPPPP
<7> right in 720
<10> and that's not to say all of them do that
<7> but not in 1080
<10> well, it accepts a 1080p signal from the source.
<10> if the tv wasn't 1080p capable the source would have to send it at 1080i or 720p I ***ume
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
dhcpcd rpm fedora 5
#computers
#beginner
#mirc
scalix fetchmailrc
#computers
yougosalavia
#nhl
#gentoo
#beginner
|
|
