| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Comments:
<0> scp and sftp are the same protocol. either requires ssh, although they can block shell access.
<0> screw scp, does it support rsync ?
<1> m0mma sync.
<2> k.
<1> k-nus.
<3> scp and sftp run different subsystems peerce
<4> **** both of em
<4> slow *** ****
<3> -C
<4> move a 700GB file using scp with compression over a 1000MB link
<3> good luck.
<1> Yeah, **** linux.
<4> its slow as ****
<0> sartan; huh? both are ssh copy, the only difference is one opens the session and moves a batch of files and closes it, while the other has an interactive client.
<1> Windows forever.
<0> and, um, disable compression on gigabit, sheesh, your CPU isn't faster than your gig ethernet
<3> Windows smells.
<4> i meant scp compression
<3> scp -c
<4> but either way
<3> or -C
<3> yeah.
<3> learning about compression.. it's not the end all to be all
<4> i benchmarked with msh's copy and scp
<4> i know scp encrypts, but bleh
<0> compression is good when you're on a slow link
<3> scp doesn't encrypt when it compresses afaik
<4> then its just cp!
<0> sartan; yes it does, unless you disable encryption
<3> compression is great in nearly all occasions except when you need responsiveness or realtime.
<0> rcp actually.
<4> but it was slow as ****
<3> look at the geeks fight
<3> haha
<4> moving an mdf file
<4> lots of white space
<3> im off shift now... i concede that scp can **** sometimes yes but overall i've had better experiences with it than alternatives for windows clients.
<0> compress a big*** file with RAR, and tell me about slow :D
<4> oh yeah
<4> i LOVE winscp
<3> and as far as it comes to compression there are a lot of variables.
<4> dude peerce
<4> compressing mdf files with rar
<4> man
<4> what a ****in whip
<4> thats a good CPU benchmark
<3> bye
<1> BAN SANTr0N.
<4> didnt you op him?
<2> fartanatron
<1> No.
<4> hrmm
<2> XTR loves all canadians
<4> i thought you two were anal lovers
<2> AYE?
<1> That was ages ago.
<4> k
<2> BACK some time
<1> Oh ****. Gilmore Gurls is on.
<2> wdf?
<4> sAMOa, you gonna come see me when im back in sd this summer?
<1> Don'T Do It.
<4> he wont
<4> flake
<1> :(
<5> ugh, and this box i'm working on obeys no fs hierarchy
<5> he uses /www and /backups and /this and /that
<6> eww!
<5> yea, it bugs the **** out of me
<1> :(
<1> didi I'm msging you eh.
<7> Gimp-Work - why does sh only have 4 peeps on it? was some nitwit hackin?
<5> ugh
<5> ellen's friend stopped by to drop something off
<1> sh - Secret Homo.
<1> Ted Did you do her?
<5> the chick who's been dating some dude for a buncha months and all she does is bitch about how "he doesn't say I Love You"
<1> OH ****. 3 way dude.
<5> if that's all you have to bitch about... go home
<8> why the hell doesn't wmplayer have a command line queue option
<8> that's all it would need, and I would switch to it
<5> command line queue?
<8> yeah
<0> BuckWild; you probably could write a WSH script that would add files/streams to the current playlist
<8> like winamp has winamp.exe /add "filename.mp3"
<5> doesn't it have it in the context menu?
<2> <4> sAMOa, you gonna come see me when im back in sd this summer?
<8> I have an application that I designed to quickly play MP3s
<2> digi y0]
<2> phone muh black *** up
<8> and it is reliant on the fact that the media player have a command line way to enqueue things
<2> i be around 'n ****
<8> I mean, you can open files the same, but you can't just queue by right-clicking then
<8> which is half the goodness
<2> announce it on winops 'n ****
<8> windows media player is like one of the only media players that doesn't have that ability
<8> and I'd just like to know, why the hell it doesn't
<5> hmm... wonder if vista's does
<2> YES, LETS DO IT
<8> doubtful
<8> I know that microsoft isn't command prompt friendly, I understand that
<8> but how hard would that have been to throw in there...
<0> holy crap, this printer IS fast. full page (8x11) top quality glossy photo in about 45 seconds, and they look gorgeous
<8> it has such good support for more complicated things
<8> and no support for something so simple
<8> frustrating.
<8> heh
<0> buck; as I said, I'm pretty sure there's a activeX interface in WMP you could use to queue files from WSH or whatever.
<8> an active x interface...
<8> wtf does everything involve an active x interface
<8> it's like people never heard of simplicity of design
<8> you shouldn't have to use active x to add things to a queue
<8> I guess that's something I'll have to consider, however, when I make the next version
<8> cuz I'd like to be able to use it with windows media player
<0> BuckWild; command lines are a HORRIBLE way to write programs. activeX is a direct interprocess call, far more efficient than forking command lines.
<4> .NOT!
<4> i mean
<4> .NET
<0> .NET builds on activeX, but yeah, an even simpler way of invoking it.
<8> peerce, command lines aren't a horrible way to write things that would be insanely more complicated another way
<8> there is nothing wrong with command lines
<4> thats not what he said
<8> just like there was nothing incredibly wrong with .ini files
<4> like hell there wasnt
<8> it might be more "efficient"
<0> ini files had to be rewritten from scratch each time you changed one value, and they had to be scanned top to bottom sequentially.
<0> speaking of horrid.
<8> peerce, not that they couldn't have been altered to work in a different way
<0> really?
<8> yes.
<8> I'll tell you what's worse
<4> yeah
<8> the registry
<4> its called xml
<0> how would that be? how could I add a few bytes to a field near the beginning of a ini file WITHOUT rewriting it from scratch?
<4> yeah
<8> yeah, XML would work
<0> XML is also very inefficient, the parsing overhead is atrocious
<4> compared to ini files???
<0> yeah, its more overhead to parse XML than the typical .INI
<8> the registry is a straight up mess of complications
<4> no way
<0> the registry is an indexed database
<8> hardly needed for an OS to function
<8> indexed database
<4> take a 1 mb xml file and a 1 mb ini file
<8> that's a polite way of putting it
<4> uh yeah
<0> 1MB of .INI format info would probably take 2 MB of XML
<4> thats fine, there is relation to it, there is structure
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#worldcup
7oob
#heroin
#bsd
willow bark(aprin) use
#narcotics
#freebsd
how-to setup pcmcia card fc5
#beginner
#worldcup
|
|