| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Comments:
<0> Okay, EVE is it ... at least for me for the next 14 days.
<1> digidog: Yeah with a company our size, i dont think so either
<2> there aren't any naked people
<3> though
<3> exchange non enterprise isnt that expensive
<3> you are talking about 2 grand and 30 bucks a cal
<4> I think Secret Service Agent Pierce is in on it
<5> AHAHA.
<5> You go FK.
<3> we just submitted our citrix upgrade order
<3> 54K
<3> fun
<4> s|tR|cKz
<5> Woah didi.
<1> digidog: essentially all our employees really just use email to shoot small part files and notes about part improvements back and forth. being an engineering firm, most time is spent doing actual down-to-the-metal work and not standard office ****
<2> that's a pansy cluster
<2> you getting opterons?
<3> though we are getitng citrix p***word mamanger and secure access as well
<3> opterons for what?
<2> sorry
<2> "farm"
<5> ahaha.
<2> citrix
<3> why would i do that?
<5> ahaha.
<3> opterons belong on database servers
<2> noes
<5> Stupid c0w.
<3> yes
<2> dualcorepwn
<5> didib0rg Google is going AMD. :)
<3> citrix farms are quite intelligent
<5> I jumped the Intel ship like 2 months ago.
<3> and there isnt any need for high end servers
<1> We are using Opterons quite a bit lately. Their FPU core is freaking insane. those processors churn thru engineering **** so beautifully.
<3> being you have a bunch anyhow
<6> virtualization people.
<3> ok
<6> please stand by for less servers and more work per server.
<5> Virtual Anus.
<3> amonfils jumps on the nutrend
<6> 'new trend'
<6> see: mainframe
<3> yeah
<3> still new
<6> **** is old as dirt.
<3> just not in concept
<2> no
<2> it's the same old ****
<6> it's just making it's way around
<2> just shiniery
<2> shinyer
<5> ahaha.
<6> citrix.
<6> is nothing more than a glorifed 3270 terminal.
<3> but i havent seen the new Citrix virtualization farms
<7> whatever
<3> though i hear they are working them out nicely
<6> processing happens on some central device.
<2> citrix is an excuse for an admin to be lazy
<4> HAHAHAHA
<6> screen and keyboard happens elsewhere.
<2> and only have to patch a few machines
<2> LAZY ADMIN
<4> "If everyone on '24' would just follow Jack's instructions, it would be called '12'"
<3> dumb *** user
<1> WSUS
<3> when you know what citrix really is, come back and talk
<2> i know what it is
<5> ahaha.
<3> sure you do :)
<2> and i know it has uses
<7> z0g^g: it's a lot of initial effort to set it up i noticed, going through all the patches
<2> pffft
<2> i could manage your tiny farm
<5> The way of the future.
<1> setting up wsus? are you sure? it was a walk in the park for me.
<2> i've broken much bigger systems
<3> and yet, you're stuck with act
<2> i'm waiting out till i get my degree
<3> uhhuh
<7> z0g^g: going through the actual list and approving them.. tedious for me
<3> so you can manage citrix then?
<7> no time in the day ;(
<2> and hit the market with 4 years consulting experience, and a degree
<3> Aurelius dont do it that wau
<3> way
<2> digi, what is there to manage
<2> seriously
<7> digidog: i am going based on what the computers mark as "needed"
<3> set up an OU that gets all updates first (like the IT department)
<3> then delay the users
<7> hm
<3> DrunkCow: you not knowing proves my point
<1> Aurelius: Yeah that part of the initial setup is a bit odd. I happened to know which updates did break our software (which did take a full freaking day to figure out beforehand), and selected everything but those to approve.
<2> no
<2> like give me one example of something that i'd have to do
<2> that i don't already know how to do
<3> setup and configure SSO p***words for 12 different heterogeneous websites
<3> integrate redirect content management into sharepoint portal
<2> stop using acronyms just to be an ***
<1> Aurelius: now i just have my desktop in a "test" group then i do a mixed approval to my box, test out our software, if it seems to work okay, approve it everywhere. its so sweet. i bow down to wsus.
<3> redirected
<2> sharepoint has NOTHING to do with citrix
<3> im just answeing your question
<3> like hell it doesnt
<3> see
<7> z0g^g: yeah, just going through it the intial list
<7> too little time :(
<2> no, it doesn't
<2> in your case it might
<7> having to deal with customers too much
<3> !google citrix presentation server sharepoint integration
<8> http://www.citrix.com/English/ps2/products/feature.asp?contentID=22342
<2> but it's not part of "citrix"
<3> like hell it isnt
<3> is that not the citrix website?
<2> i bet most people with citrix don't use it
<7> nope
<6> so you need 'sharepoint' to deploy citrix?
<3> nope
<2> in fact
<2> i know most don't
<2> because of the 25 clients i have that use citrix
<2> ONE uses sharepoint
<3> hey you asked for examples on managing citrix
<3> i gave you one
<3> no,, two
<1> Now, if only our office can integrate WeSYP. that would own.
<2> heh
<2> 10 minutes on msdn could tell me how do to that digi
<3> no
<2> it's not ****in rocket science
<3> again
<3> see
<5> Oh hello. TGIF.
<2> it's windows
<3> you are on the wrong course
<3> 10 minutes on Citrix's website maybe
<3> msdn has nothing to do with this
<3> we are discussing citrix
<3> get with it
<1> yeah if you havent seen this already its hillarious.
<1> !google wsyp site:microsoft.com
<5> No see, TGIF.
<6> i don't know what you ****s are arguing about. the future is linux with kdm or gdm managing your users desktops over nxmachine links
<2> msdn has nothing to do with sharepoint?
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#stocks
#fedora
qmailrocks sucks
#flash
#nhl
#linuxhelp
rejected.wmv -site:deftone.com
enta ya a7la baba
#unixhelp
#flash
|
|