| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Comments:
<0> eh?
<0> they're comparable to pentium M
<1> I'm thinking of taking the cpu from my laptop, throwing it into my desktop
<0> I think you're thinking of AMD from like 2 years ago maybe
<2> there is a laptop with a 4800+ x2 in it seifried
<1> and OCING to ****
<2> so yes, they still win
<0> Gimp-Cow: yeah and?
<3> oh well
<3> I like Intell still
<2> you think there is an intel laptop that can compete with a 4800?
<0> Gimp-Cow: _if_ intel had anything like that to offer it wouldn't be battery friendly either =)
<3> Im used to their crap
<2> yeah true
<1> AMD could have thrown Barton-M's into laptops
<2> it's good for like
<1> don't know why they didn't
<2> 30 minutes
<2> and it would light your lap on fire
<3> Plus I do alot of graphics work....Intel is faster
<2> but DAMN it's fast
<3> AMD is great for games
<1> no
<1> AMD is better for graphics now
<2> fatal, what kinda graphics?
<3> Have a buddy who has a 4800
<2> cause maya is mad faster on amd
<3> mine performs faster
<1> nah man, AMD IS BETTER
<3> Photoshop, AE, Combustion, Softimage XSI etc
<2> XSI is faster
<3> for the 64bit, yes
<2> i haven't tried combustion on an intel
<0> |FATAL|: you're full of it
<2> well **** dude, of course
<0> and by "it" I mean bull****
<3> seifried I need to take a bathroom break
<2> who wouldn't run XSI 64?
<3> If you have the CPU, fine
<2> and AE is all I/O bound
<3> Intel ****s on MAC & AMD in AE scores
<2> so is combustion really
<3> Macs cant even compete with AMD & Intel in the CPU speed department
<2> we know
<1> all the top end amd cpu's are faster and have better energy consumption than INTEL
<3> Probably
<0> I love intel
<0> in two years our new cpu's will tromp amd
<1> intel is still getting screwed over on their MHZ hungry strategy
<3> Hey which CPU is faster? P4 32bit 3.0Ghz LGA775 or the 64bit version?
<0> .. so wait two years please
<1> why should I wait two years
<4> LOL >
<4> VAGIN.
<0> a99: actually they've about faced on that
<0> they're working on new serial interfaces/etc
<1> "working"
<1> Amd got over that years ago
<0> basically their own version of HT
<3> Anyone?
<3> 64bit or 32bit CPUs?
<1> HT ****s
<1> :D
<0> who knows, they may leapfrog
<3> HT owns
<0> hyper transport
<0> not hyper threading. moron
<2> well in two years CSI comes out
<3> Hyper Threading...
<2> but amd will prolly have an answer by then
<3> seigried lick my hairy nutsac
<0> also this ignores the niagara from sun
<0> 64 threads on one cpu
<2> yeah cause that's risc
<2> that's only a serverspace issue
<0> well you show me a 64 thread system in 1U from intel/amd then...
<3> All this nerd talk is ****ting on my brain
<3> lol
<2> nah i agree it rocks for some ****
<0> only.. heh. there's a lot of servers ya know
<2> but it's a niche
<2> nah only certain apps will run nice on it
<0> yeah. web serving is kind of a large niche last I heard
<3> So anyone know the diff between the 64bit or 32bit intels?
<0> uhh I almost bought one
<3> SPeed wise? 64bit is cheaper
<0> for my website
<5> seifried - you're ***uming that amd is not going to innovate any longer. :D
<0> I'd have to upgrade in maybe 5-6 years
<2> you almost bought a niagra?
<2> lols
<5> in two years amd will be .65nm and likely faster/cooler/less power hungry than intel again. :D
<1> amd better watch out for the Yonah DUAL core cpu's though, those things have better consumption than dothans
<0> nerp: leapfrog... amd did it with HT, why can't intel? =)
<3> Hey nerp last Q ...sorry man.......got info ont his? Since no one wants to answer
<5> a99 - the yonah isn't all that amazing. :D
<3> 32bit vs 64bit...same CPU
<2> because AMD isn't sitting on it's laurels
<0> neither is intel
<5> it's better, but not an amd killer by any means
<2> no intel is having process and interconnect issues
<1> its a nice chip though thats for sure
<2> i'd bet amd already has the next move done
<5> what do you mean fatal?
<0> yeah and they're working on it
<3> nerp, the 64bit and 32bit P4 775 3.0Ghz Prescotts...same speeds?
<0> weeither way I'm happy. real competition = cheap cheap fast fast
<5> no idea.
<5> i haven't read up on the intels
<1> I hate intel corp though
<3> oh
<3> Wanna know if I should return this current CPU
<0> they're basically doing a major chnage in strategy, marketing, tech, etc
<1> their predatory business strategies are bad for consumers
<3> and get the 64bit, for future
<2> man
<0> a99: uhh all major companies are predatory
<2> this enfield is in great shape
<1> not like INTEL
<0> uhh...
<1> intel pays many many companies not to even touch AMD
<1> or face very strick sanctions
<0> you must like in a nice soft pink world
<5> and amd is still making inroads. :D
<6> and AMD gives stuff away so others use AMD, part of the game
<1> how come DELL isn't selling AMD buddy ole pal?
<0> reminds me of a friend saying pharmaceutical firms never do anything bad
<2> they are
<0> a99: actually they do
<0> a99: just the cpu's though which is odd
<3> Intel is a bigger name
<3> sells more
<0> a99: before you wanna whine and whinge get your facts right =)
<1> I wanted an amd CPU in my laptop... no chace..
<1> chance..
<1> dell ****s
<0> uh
<6> dell is just fine when you know what you are getting
<0> a99: I have an amd laptop... there's a few thousand models with amd cpus
<6> I like my workstation
<1> not from dell
<0> sony, acer, you name it
<5> hp is really going gonzo with the amd turions
<0> a99: there are other places than dell
<1> I like dell though -
<3> Ooh
<3> CPU prices went up
<1> their support can't be touched.
<3> hell yea.........its $208 now, got it for $189
<0> hahahaaaaaa
<0> oh ****
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#windows
#heroin
kirkenes poker
#asp
vcd2mp3
openwrt irssi screen usable?
#sex
#nhl
neopets scumie
#linuxhelp
|
|