| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Comments:
<0> Oh hi lovers.
<1> Reminds me of the time I had to deal with Blizzard.
<2> Hello my future cell mate.
<1> I still haven't heard a respone to them after we had agreed I was going to purchase a substantial amount of licenses :)
<1> C0w, is that your room?
<3> yes
<1> Mines messier.
<4> what on earth?
<3> oblivion is teh funny
<5> what's with the jerking-off fist at the bottom of the picture?
<3> that means he's unarmed
<0> OH GAWD. THE KORKS IN SHORTS.
<5> looks more like it means he's weilding a +2 pork sword.
<0> RUN.
<5> wielding
<3> man sas is gonna be tight once everything starts shipping
<3> did you know sas drives have two physical ports?
<6> jerking off rules.
<6> btw.
<7> fiberchannel has had that for years. can be used as full duplex, or both can be halfduplex, thats up to the controller
<6> Is SAS new hard drive technology?
<3> interface, yes
<3> peerce, sas isn't shared
<6> Using Sata?
<8> serial scsi
<3> sas is serial attached scsi, on which, sata drives can be used
<9> Serial Killer
<6> hmm scsi, so new and exepensive.
<8> Gimp-Work; it can be, as most SAS systems use multiplexors
<3> yes peerce, but most fiber channel systems just have two runs
<10> hm. How very very odd, everytime i install a hard drive or replace one in my computer, the volume slider in windows resets to it's default factory setting (highest! and really loud!!!)
<5> cereal killer. the banana made me do it.
<3> MarshallE, turn off your ****ing speakrs
<8> Gimp-Work; um, full blown FC systems are switched, and have many channels. and each FC 'channel' is a dual fiber
<3> sas > fiberchannel
<8> the SAN controllers I'm looking at have like 8 ports on the controller, which can be used EITHER for drive bays or host connects
<8> there's very little infrastructure available for SAS yet
<3> so what
<3> it's a better basis then fiberchannel
<8> so, no, its the other way around. most likely high end stuff will be host-FC-switch-FC-SAN-FC-ch***is-SAS-drives
<9> We just got an EMC MX-1500 all FC
<9> with Brocades
<8> new FC stuff is 4Gbps and soon going 10Gbps
<3> hah 4gbps
<3> ONE sas channel is 3gbps
<3> and a host interconnect is 4 of those
<3> pwnt.
<8> each FC link has TWO channels, 2/4/10Gbps
<3> yeah but sas is 12gbps NOW
<8> and most hosts have two fiberchannels
<3> plus cost.....
<8> multipath redundancy.
<3> yeah sas has that
<11> la - dee - friggen - dah!
<8> yeah, SAS is really cheap, CUZ YOU CANT BUY MUCH OF IT YET
<3> no, because it's not optical
<3> ***hat
<8> FC drives are copper, FC can run copper OR optical.
<3> really, what's the ring made of?
<8> most FC is optical so you CAN PUT THE BACKUP SAN 10kM AWAY
<3> hehe peerce you don't have to yell
<8> ring? what ring? its all point to point nowdays, FC/AL is mostly obsolete
<3> you can do that with sas
<3> i can run USB 10km away
<3> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MP9CHQZ3mHw&search=Oblivion
<8> fawkin asians. first email in my inbox at work has a 60MB attachment which is a zip of a single WORD file, holy fawk.
<3> ahahahahahaha
<11> I'm bored... maybe I'll leave early today
<11> I love when they do **** and I get a winmail.dat file. I tell them to send in a non-Microsoft format
<11> Outlook does that whole text neutral encapsulation format if you leave it default
<11> I hate that ****
<11> gonna see if I can be on 2 irc networks at the same time with this client.. so if I disappear... hehehe... big deal! :)
<3> omg yardbird vanished, his client must be teh broken
<11> bastage
<11> :)
<11> guess I can... on freenode and efnet at the same time. :) Been a long time since I IRC'ed
<10> i am going to get some highend speakers... im guessingthat i need high end sound card (one, just one) and... high quality CDs??? can't use my onboard foxconn thingy huh...
<10> maybe i'm not an audiophile but, i can't seem to notice the difference between a high end sound card and an onboard..
<3> marshall rawr?
<10> i had a creative live value card, back in the day and it didn't sound betterthan my onboard implementation
<12> ok this I don't understand. "Unable to add Global.asax to the project. Sever error. The folder is marked executable. You are not alliowed to put files into an executable folder on this server." Exactly how, then, am I supposed to push an ASP.NET project there that requires "executable" set on the directory in order for IIS to execute it?
<3> what happens when you unmark executable
<12> It let's me put the file there
<12> except
<12> it has to be executable
<12> or IIS won't run the app
<3> you tested it? :P
<12> yes
<3> yeah, iis is a pos
<3> i hate it :P
<13> http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb;en-us;308451&spid=2514&sid=389
<13> CAUSE
<13> This problem may occur if the content folder you are trying to save a file that is configured to allow executable programs to run. You cannot save files to a folder that is set to run executable files.
<13> RESOLUTION
<13> Configure the Web site to allow only scripts in the content folder to run. To do this, follow these steps:
<3> ah
<13> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=308948 same thing there
<13> CAUSE
<13> This behavior can occur if the script execution permissions for your Web site are configured incorrectly on the server, as follows:
<13> In IIS 5.0, the Execute Permissions option is set to Scripts and Executables.
<13> RESOLUTION
<13> To resolve this issue, set the script execution permissions for your Web site to Scripts only (in IIS 5.0)
<12> if I follow that resolution
<12> the app won't run
<12> apps need to be /executed/
<13> its literally an exe
<13> running on the server?
<12> it's an ASP.NET web application
<12> which gets /executed/
<12> if the directory is not set to execute, I get execute permission denied when trying to acces sit
<14> run a batch file to change permissions twice?
<15> fah fah fah fah fah fah fah fah fah fah away
<10> what is your take on spinrite vs. getdataback???
<13> dunno, I would have though .aspx files are treated as "scripts", so exec perms on "scripts" would be enough
<10> they're both vaunted.
<10> i wont' be able to afford both..
<13> .net does jit compiling and builds its own dlls someplace else
<8> MarshallE; both are quite unneccessary if you backup important files
<8> the old ounce of prevention vs pound of cure thing, ya know?
<15> psycho killer, run run run run awayyyyyyyyyyyyyy
<5> it's being worth, not versus.
<15> w000 h000
<8> sAMOa; go tthe WARP-II shirts back from the printer yesterday. they look awesome.
<8> coooolmax
<15> hey, my gf loved the look of last years too
<15> 21/22/23 right?
<13> FKnight`: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vbcon/html/vxurfwebaccessfailuredialog.asp describes a similar problem under "Unable to add <Filepath> to the project" and has a link to "Unable to put files in an executable folder" (http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vbcon/html/vbtbsunabletoputfilesinexecutablefolder.asp)
<16> feh
<17> visual office
<12> "Your Internet Information Services (IIS) settings for your default Web server need to be set to Scripts and Executables" <-- except the error message says it can't be set for Executables
<8> sAMOa; yeah
<13> that says the "default" web server
<13> are you trying to publish to a virtual server
<3> ohhh
<3> did you make the folder an application?
<3> lol
<15> coo
<12> the "Default Web Server" is a virtual server that happens to be called 'Default Web Server". There's no difference.
<3> fk your app is in it's own dir right?
<12> it's in it's own directory yes
<16> hey fk are you guys running exchange front-end and back-end servers ?
<3> did you make the virtual folder an application
<12> Pfft: no
<16> hehe if you ever have a choice, don't :-)
<12> Gimp-Work: it's an application
<12> in that drop down, ys
<12> *yes
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#beginner
noegnud deb
#stocks
#politics
#gentoo
#beginner
#politics
#stocks
qmail smtp level check
#directx
|
|