| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Comments:
<0> Yet it let you ping it...
<1> but i appreciate the help
<2> moosejaw; do remember to turn that firewall back on when you take the laptop on the road
<1> what firewall should i use for my laptop?
<3> moose send it fragmented packets.... till it crashes and BANG !
<2> XP SP2 is fine AFAIK.
<0> Windows firewall!
<4> Dov-Work: it sees icmp as not as critical as netbios
<1> windows firewall really?
<2> or the enhanced one in Microsoft/Live OneCare
<0> ICMP is the devil.
<3> i wouldn't recomend windows firewall.... but allrite...
<4> Dov-Work: hehe, right.
<2> I used to like Kerio Personal Firewall,b ut its discontinued :-/
<1> alka: i use zonealarm on my desktop...should i use it on my laptop?
<3> remember moosejaw firewalls are only as strong as the software they are running on'
<1> or the wireless version?
<2> !info zonealarm
<0> Most low end software firewalls block ICMP/Ping commands.
<1> ahh
<1> so i shouldnt?
<1> hehe
<3> blackice is nice...
<2> blocking ping is lame.
<0> ZA blocks ping/ICMP by default.
<3> decent that is'
<1> black ice...ok i will use that on both machines
<2> its about as smart as hiding your street numbers so thiefs can't find your house.
<4> OMG.
<2> oh, KPF lives on as Sunbelt... http://www.sunbelt-software.com/Kerio.cfm
<2> hmmm
<3> moosejaw it was only a suggestion ... i'm sure there are better ones.... google it :P
<2> KPF Lite is free, and full KPF is $20
<1> its usually best to use the opinion of you guys
<3> killerwall!
<3> i dunno if they make a windows port tough....
<4> our opinions usually **** ***
<3> peerafk does windows firewall block outgoing ??
<5> no
<2> alkatraz; thats like lockign the door after the barn burned down. kinda pointless
<3> i didn't think it did'..
<1> is kerio good?
<2> once malware is in your system, its kinda too late
<5> workstations shouldnt generally block outgoing
<5> especially with p2p technology nowdays
<4> i run c2 compliant.
<3> guess we think differently thts all'
<2> I used Kerio on my laptop before XP SP2 came out
<3> thats was one of the main reasons i stopped using windows fw days after the patch'
<5> because of the lack of outgoing filtering?
<3> yep
<5> thats odd
<4> NIS ****ing pissed me off
<3> its a family comp so i dunno what my little brother/mom/aunts do with it'
<1> im going to use kerio
<2> outbound 'nagware' firewalls in the hands of the naive are worthless.
<4> they did a liveupdate, which pushed a new ruleset out... block outgoing SSL connections on 443
<6> hi is anyone familiar with mercury mail server?
<2> they'll randomly click 'allow' or not, and break all kinda ****
<5> well the point is (and even though vista will support outgoing filtering) you must explicitly allow something in and it must execute for a threat to be local and compromise the system with outgoing traffic
<6> i am having troubles setting up a smtp server
<5> so if you are on a shared computer, it's best to be preventative at the FS level first
<0> OMGlikeOM, what is the issue?
<7> Where's c0w.
<2> OMGlikeOM: 1) to run a SMTP server, you need a static IP with DNS, preferably reverse DNS too.
<2> 2) said network connection can't block inbound port 25
<0> MX records.
<4> reverse dns? wherefore?
<5> to be complient
<2> Aurelius; lotsa mail servers will refuse mail from IPs without DNS
<5> compliant
<4> pfft
<2> without reverse DNS
<5> PTR's are a must
<2> common spam protection
<2> Aurelius; fine. i wont' see your mail, neither will anyone else I run a server for.
<4> oh
<4> you don't mean matching forward reverse
<4> heh
<6> I have a dynamic DNS, but i just want to run SMTP so i can code/run PHP code using the MAIL function. I tried including my ISP nameservers but i can't get it working
<2> if it doesn't match, it will be tagged as suspect
<0> Oh, that's different.
<6> its a temporary SMTP server
<0> You want outbound.
<1> how bout antivirus and suggestions?
<4> peerafk: i've never really had a problem
<2> OMGlikeOM; you should use your ISP's MAIL servers not NAME servers.
<5> well you probably don't send 500K emails a day
<0> OMGlikeOM, I will tell you one easy thing. Optus does NOT allow port 25 on it's network.
<6> damn it
<5> doesnt matter
<5> you dont need to run a smtp server to test a mail function
<6> How else can i practice my PHP mail function
<0> Where are you hosting this script?
<5> simply specify your upl;inks SMTP servers and auth
<4> digidog: no, I don't. but volume shouldn't have anything to do with whether i am tagged as "suspect"
<6> The script is on my Hard drive at the moment running Xampp
<5> well the point is, it's not RFC compliant, so if you want mail integrety, you will have appropriate PTR's
<5> if you dont want that integrety, who cares anyhow
<3> anyone ever messaround with chiper.exe ??
<5> e/a
<6> please don't confuse me and get too technical digi :P
<0> Ok, use mail.optusnet.com.au as your mail server and pop in your authentication credentials.
<4> well, do you mean that if said MX record points at mail1.sample.com
<8> amateur hour in #windows again :(
<5> and mail.sample.com doesnt have a PTR?
<8> digi, brees is closer to you now
<8> :P
<5> it isnt a good thing for integrity
<8> when dallas ****s, you can root for the saints
<5> chamois.. nah, seems Henson is doing fine in europe
<5> pluis
<5> we have TO
<8> dude, the cowboys aint going anywhere this year like the chargerz
<5> side bet on record?
<8> bofe teams **** left nutz
<4> that the A response for mail1.sample.com... 4.3.2.1, that 1.2.3.4.in-addr.arpa needs to resolve to mail1.sample.com? or just that PTR for 1.2.3.4.in-addr has to resolve back to 4.3.2.1?
<8> um. the bet is?
<5> lets see
<8> cowgirlz go all the way?
<4> i haven't gone through and read the mail rfc's personally
<5> here is what we will make it
<5> no, we will make it on who has a better record
<9> is there anyway to fix a crc error
<5> and we will wager it when i come down in september
<8> **** your crc errror douche bag
<5> cause you will come see me
<0> WVU2034, not usually.
<9> hmmm
<8> go to #wecouldntgiveafuk
<5> ok sAMOa?
<9> damn anyway to copy file with crc errors
<8> k
<5> you will right?
<8> yesh
<5> k
<2> RFC's are often remarkably vague on specifics and best practices.
<8> i'm down with it bro
<5> coo
<4> peerafk: some are not though
<4> and if you guys use "compliant", i was ***uming you ewere referring to compliance with an rfc...
<8> lets talk about w3c rfc's!
<8> more fun!
<2> some of them are downrigt silly, http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1149.html
<0> <html>
<9> like just backup files with crc error cause some of my mp3 with crc errors work fine
<4> if the PTR just needs to resolve back to the IP, then that's not an issue for me.. if you are saying that the hostname for my MX record has to resolve to an ip that reverses back to the hostname
<8> IMMA JS ALL OVER YOUR WINDOWQ
<4> then that's different :)
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#goal
mysql add year sql
#politics
whois+cumondagny
nico mcbain
#nintendo
#eggtcl
#stocks
what does bonsoir mean
scripter 5000 mIRC
|
|