| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Comments:
<0> Not that I'm aware of, you just need to fast look at the top line and get the "stop code" (eg. 0x000e) and the text message on that top line.
<0> You can try safe mode to tweak that reboot on bsod, if that will load.
<1> i doubt
<1> well i am off
<1> to try and repair
<1> can i do a system restore?
<2> i only want a certain pc to be able to access a share, or atleast put a p***word on it, how can i do this
<3> hey what is this to live and free vista?!?
<4> windows shares aren't p***word protected, they're protected with user access
<3> 1st april fools?!
<3> xD
<4> remove user access from users you don't want to have access, such as "everyone" which is the default :)
<2> i did that, but i cant add anyone else because im not on a domain and the other pc's dont show up
<2> i tried adding the local Administrator account but that didnt work
<0> PRAM!
<0> robertss: You may need to include the machine name, eg. rusalka\bob to restrict foreign shares. Best is probably to make a non-admin user and admin.
<2> i did that
<2> it didnt work im guessing because im not on a domain
<2> my computer didnt show up in the locations, on the server pc showed up
<2> only&*
<0> er, re: and have identical accounts on both machines -- down to the p***word and include access for just that user.
<2> ok ill try that
<2> :)
<2> i know with samba it invokes something on windows to enter a username/p***word so im sure the functionality is there client side, its just how do i get a server like that for windows?
<5> kinit?
<0> um. dunno bob. Don't understand the question.
<6> I found an exploit in a paid software programs registration system, that company makes another product I want... for free, how should I contact them (should I?) to tell them the vunerability, and try and get that other product/title for free?
<5> with the ****ed up laws of today, i would say shut up and be quiet. you never know if they might want to charge you with conspiracy or some other random dumb ****
<0> It's usually just comment via email about the vulnerability. Companies don't make money if their reg stuff has an exploit.
<6> it's for a very low budget niche, a bot for a blog site, but there's a high demand
<4> wasn't it MIT that cracked one of those mp3 copyright encryption routines (actually, it must have been DVD's)
<2> steal it, and sell it as your own
<4> then told the them to **** off when they asked how so it could be fixed
<4> they were taken to court by the mpaa and testified that the law said it was illegal to disclose any information that could help crack the encryption routines
<6> well it's rather retarted to make a DNS query of your domain, resolve the IP address, and request a non-random unencrypted text file of valid serial numbers and purchasers, I mean hey, that's just asking for it.
<6> I should e-mail the other purchasers, so they can complain to the publisher, one might give me the other software title themselves...
<0> "How to weasel, 101"
<5> or i would maybe establish an anonymous email account via hotmail or something, and access it from a public computer, ie, from a library, to disclose it
<1> I am back
<5> or from somebodys random open wap
<1> I've disabled restart on failure
<6> I made a bat file that appends the HOSTS file forwarding their domain/ip to 127.0.0.1 then I start a Tiny HTTP server serving up the Serial number, and byp***ing the system, after the request the http server dies.
<5> open waps are everywhere
<1> And the error is 'unmountable_boot_volume STOP 0x000000ED'
<1> Tomomi: That would be it
<0> !info ntbugcodes
<5> Dude. get a program called err.exe from microsoft. commandline app. type err 0x00000000 or whatever your bugcode is, and it tells you what it is
<5> and it tells you way more then that
<5> it helps diagnose bugcodes in event logs
<5> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=be596899-7bb8-4208-b7fc-09e02a13696c&displaylang=en
<5> it says its for exchange, but it returns error codes for anything microsoft related
<0> mike___: recovery console, bootcfg /rebuild or something. An unmount error generally means boot.ini and such got out of whack, usually from being moved or had a new partition inserted before it. Or the boot stuff is just plain ****ed up.
<5> http://www.jsifaq.com/subR/tip8600/rh8663.htm
<1> z0g^g: that would be usefull If I was running windows now
<1> That's my only windows possesed hardrive
<1> I have
<5> depending on what boot.ini says, if youve changed drive types (ie, went from ide to scsi or sata or whatever) you might have to change the multi(0) to scsi(0).
<1> No, I shutdown the computer during a system update
<1> SP2
<5> oh
<1> yeah..
<1> so i am ****ed
<5> thats pretty ****ed up
<1> very
<5> can you get into safe mode?
<1> nope
<1> that's what amazes me too
<0> You can try last known good config, but it probably won't help.
<1> nope
<5> ya im sitll running sp1. both at home and at work. never going to sp2. too many problems with their over-tight security paranoia in sp2.
<1> true
<1> i render sp2 useless
<0> I'll never run SP1 on the outer subnet. Just too many exploits.
<5> ive somewhere that over 50% of businesses running winxp still refuse sp2
<1> Hmm
<5> i wouldnt even EXPOSE a windows machine to the raw internet. **** no. i have layers of cisco and linux routers in between
<1> I know that many businesses are switching to unix/linux
<4> z0g^g - why? the only real problem I've ever had with sp2 is the firewall
<1> Windows was just made to be prone to outsiders
<4> and oh, you can disable in gpo
<4> takes all of 2 minutes
<1> the firewall is horrible
<7> nothing wrong with sp2
<7> yeah, just shut the firewall off
<7> or manage it with GPO like BBS said
<5> BBS: certain drivers involved with copy protection software for our applications, we've seen flip out with the NX thingie
<4> the only problem is you probably have to update your gpo templates
<4> big deal
<7> we have two divisions running xpsp2 with GPO managed firewall rules and it works real nice - real tight securitty
<5> bbs: of course not MS's problem but overall I see no reason we need SP2.
<5> I dont need every machine in the company to have its own firewall. We are on a firewalled subnet
<7> other than that it fixes a lot of stuff, and you can disable the security addons ?
<1> Hah
<1> RESOLUTION
<1> To resolve this behavior, use the appropriate method.
<1> And thats the end
<4> yes, that's why you disable it with gpo
<5> i use wsus to keep the xp sp1 machines up to date
<0> I need another 12' KVM cable set. Oh bother.
<5> ms keeps patching sp1
<5> so why do i need sp2?
<4> the firewall is actually a problem on domains
<4> causes exchange to not work, some printer drivers flip out, etc
<5> yeah it is a big problem. i have it shut off for the few laptops on the domain with sp2 installed
<4> oh, and a major problem with master browser elections, omg
<5> "i elect to be browser"... (everyone else) "ok!"... (later on) "can i get a browse list?"... "what i cant hear you i have a firewall up)
<1> Well thanks for your help, I've got to go, see what I can do
<5> actually ive never seen that happen and i dont know if it does, but i just pulled that out of my *** a minute ago
<4> it does
<4> I've seen it
<4> what ends up happening though is a machine starts up, says "force an election", then can't see any of the responses, so says "ok, I guess I'm by myself, I'M master browser
<5> ive done some registry mods to my DCs to ensure theyre always the browsemaster, because our workstations are usually processing data, heavily, and having any of them being a dependent browse master would slow **** down
<4> servers always have priority over workstations as master browser
<4> regardless of the computer's specs
<4> then DC's have priority over other servers
<4> so you shouldn't have to do anything to make sure your workstatiosn aren't mb
<5> yeah im just being on the safe side
<5> cause im ****ing around with linux, and im not 100% proficient in samba, and i dont want them suddenly becoming BMs
<4> ah
<4> yes
<4> samba defaults to DC's level of priority
<4> which is kind of stupid of them, but w/e
<5> indeed
<4> I have a friend who used to work for a rather large financial firm
<4> and he set up an old machine with linux just to have fun, put samba on it
<4> and caused a ****storm when this pathetic little 486 25 sx couldn't handle it :)
<5> ouch
<4> which is the only reason I know about this setting
<4> because he relayed the story to me over about 10 drinks worried he was gonna get canned :)
<5> i know very few people who run a fully linux org and has a few windows machines on it, running samba as the ad backbone... usually the other way around. which is why its strange that samba would take high priority
<4> this is also quite a few years ago, maybe they changed the default samba settings
<4> but that's how it was back then
<5> yea im not sure how it is now. whatever the settings are in suse 9.3 and 10. i havent had any troubles. i just modded the reg to be on the safe side.
<4> perhaps their reasoning was that it would be used more by small companies as an alternative for a windows server
<4> and therefor should be the mb
<5> you ever use NQS?
<5> network queueing system
<5> originally by Monsanto, now a sourceforge project
<5> it doesnt compile in gcc 4.x anymore. and the project appears to have been abandoned.
<5> i couldnt get it compiled for x64 under suse v10 which uses gcc 4, but happened to have a x64 sles 9.3 box where i could create a build tree, compile it there, then install from that.
<5> but what a pita...
<8> or you could have just fixed the code :P
<5> man i havent touched c in 10 years
<8> it's like a bike
<9> http://www.mexica-movement.org/granmarcha.htm
<8> except for the seg faults
<5> that was back when i got a degree in programming that stinking language. you expect me to remember any of that now? :D
<0> I haven't c coded since the switch to ANSI c.
<5> i was scared about c when i learned about programming gui msvc. then anyway got some oddball job learning and programming some bizarre no-name product at some company, and learned VB there, and learned most companies use VB for their internal code.
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
TURN OFF WINDOWS LOGO TESTING
#winxp
#online
TextField.htmlText href gotoandplay
#beginner
toplist.linkworld
nerocheck disable
#politics
#politics
#beginner
|
|