| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Comments:
<0> is it Windows Genuine Authnetication?
<1> ya its wga
<2> WGA is the new video standard!
<2> it involves placing a large popup on your tray
<0> then follow the instructions it gives you if you want to be legal. otherwise, reformat that system, and run somethign else if you wanna be a pirate.
<3> so muddy what happens if i plug monitor out from a real sound system into a ****ty little ipod
<3> cant that overjuice me ? :)
<1> no patches isn't this the windows channel :P
<2> it's a new standard, 32-bit color, resolution of 1600x1200 and a large weird popup in your tray
<0> monitor out, as in a headphone level output ?
<4> !info warez
<0> headphone outputs set to about 50-60% level are fairly compatible with stereo line input.
<3> monitor out from like ... a bose PA system
<0> is that monitor out for a headphone, or for floor monitor speakers?
<3> so its like line out
<3> for floor monitor spkrs
<2> bose? eww
<2> no highs? no lows? must be bose!
<3> well ... they use a lot of different systems
<4> wheeee!
<3> it sounds a lot better than the klever unit we have at home :)
<2> bose: better sound through marketing
<0> ok, floor monitor speakers usually (yeah, eeew on Bose, heavily overhyped overrated overpriced ****)... stage stuff uses balanced line.
<4> !info wga
<4> (i'm surprised there wasn't anything in there for WGA before.)
<0> you need a matching transformer or at least a resistor network to kick that down to consumer stereo line.
<2> what's great is that they came out with WGA right around the same time I bought a media center edition computer and installed linux on my other computer
<3> yeah that's waht i thought
<3> i think we'll just record via mike for starters
<2> so both of my computers are entirely authentic =P
<3> i dont want to cook this precious old linux-running ipod just yet
<0> doesn't the PA have a RCA line out?
<3> no
<3> well some do
<0> how about a headphone output ?
<3> depends on who we're recording :)
<3> its all these different crazy yoga/indian music performer types
<0> ah, dragging their own funky *** PA? yeah, that **** can **** mightly.
<0> if you see that fender clamshell system, run screaming.
<3> eheheh
<0> fender p***port, thats the one. I dunno why they are so popular, total piece of **** system
<0> this thing, http://www.zzounds.com/item--FEN0691002003
<0> hmmmm. http://www.zzounds.com/item--EBTLLS2PKG that box might help a lot, along with a pair of XLR adapters.
<5> in command line arguments is it possible to p*** in a new line like \n in javascript?
<6> happydude. Why you such a happy dude?
<7> Got his duodenum on the go. SNAP
<8> Is there any way to add a virtual IP address thats bridged onto the NIC of an XP box that is running DHCP?
<8> like could I add a virtual IP address of 172.16.1.1 to my NIC and leave the DHCP and the primary IP address intact?
<8> I want to run on two IP networks simultaneously
<8> the internet and 172.1.x.x
<7> xtor: Additional addresses can be added to a nic (net connections, <nic/net>, tcp/ip, advanced.
<8> I thought that was only to a NIC whose first address is static as opposed to DHCP. Lemme see
<5> i'm trying to use a command line email program and i need to p*** in a body that contains returns - anyone know to do this?
<7> er, properties*, advanced.
<9> happydude: mailx address@example.com < messagebody.txt ?
<0> yes, windows will not allow you to have a static and DHCP address on the same interface.
<9> er, mailx address@example.com subject < messagebody.txt
<9> or whatever
<8> Oh thats nice. I guess things have changed since NT 4
<0> you really shouldn't overlay another IP subnet on a network thats directly connected to your ISP anyways.
<8> my ISP uses 10.x internally and my cablemodem/router uses 192.168 internally
<8> 172 is free
<0> so you're already on a NAT network?
<10> has anyone ran into error 2337 when installing sharepoint portal server?
<0> so use a static IP in teh 192.168 range.
<8> Well I just addes 172.16.1.222 but I cannot ping that address from my Xp box..nor do I see it in ipconfig /all
<7> routing problem?
<8> no it should be able to ping itself regardless
<0> windows will not allow you to have a static and DHCP address on the same interface.
<8> <0> yes, windows will not allow you to have a static and DHCP address on the same interface. <--- I missed the NOT there before
<0> if you are already on a private network behind your cable modem, why do want to overlay it with another private subnet ?
<11> but you can do "static dhcp",ie. it gets the IP via DHCP but always the same one, based on MAC
<9> the issue is he wants two IP addresses on the same NIC
<0> mutante; thats a function of the DHCP server, and windows STILL won't let you ***ign an additional static IP to that interface.
<9> one DHCP, one static
<12> ****in werk.
<8> because I want to set up an apache server with multiple IP addresses. I need a diff IP address so I can serve an SSL certificate I am told
<9> Which NT can _do_ (or could), but its not exposed in the UI
<8> static dhcp? How does it keep renewing the lease though?
<0> ssl certificates are generally bound to a public static IP
<8> Oh you mean its a reg hack?
<8> Oh so I cannot bind my SSL cert to a 172? Yikes...
<5> Jet: thanks! i didn't think of writing to a file first
<0> xtor; 'static dhcp' just means the DHCP server has the MAC-IP relationship locked down. the client can't tell the difference.
<0> anyways, I do not understand your statement about 'different IP address so you can serve a SSL certificate'.
<8> peer yes the client cannot tell the difference but pereodically the client has to keep renewing the DHCP lease before it expires. And if you dont then the DHCP server will give that IP to someone else in comcast
<0> you can serve https/ssl over a single IP
<13> we gonna rock down to.. electric avenue
<13> and then we'll take it higher
<8> I was told in #apache that you CANNOT run virtual hosts on the same IP address and serve SSL certificates. You need a different IP for each SSL enabled website
<8> And I wanted to test that system out on my home LAN before I implemented it on my dedicated server
<13> you CAN do it BUT only for the first site in the list.
<11> xtor: lease time can be set to very long periods and you can also "renew" to the same settings, but seems comment didnt really match the problem in the first place
<13> all the rest will be considered NamedVirtual which will be unable to have their OWN certs unless they are on seperate IPs
<0> is your home network on a private IP range in the first place?
<8> right I want to do it for as many vhosts as I can. Preferably more than 4. But so far I cant even get one working right.
<13> you can't
<0> like, you said the cable modem uses 192.168.x.x ?
<8> mutante isnt it up to the DHCP server to choose the maximum lease time?
<13> you either need 4 seperate IPs, or to share the cert with ALL of the sites
<11> xtor: yea, i meant the server, or actually a hardware router feature
<0> you can't share a cert because the hostname is in the cert.
<8> the cablemodem uses 192.168.x.x but only to communicate between itself..and the next hop router(which is 10.x and 192.x). But the cablemodem ***igns public IP addresses to my own computers
<11> xtor: since most people get DHCP from a small hardware router
<13> again..
<13> you either need 4 seperate IPs, or to share the cert with ALL of the sites
<0> oh. then get a home router or something, and run everything on your LAN on 192.168.0 or something
<0> pgpkeys; you can't share a cert with differently named sites.
<8> mutante my cablemodem is a DHCP relay agent...it gets my public IP from a DHCP server on comcast.net
<9> if you share a cert between sites, won't the browser complain that the name on the cert doesn't match the name on the site?
<13> SSL certs are bound to IPs and only the FIRST site on the IP will be properly ***ociated.
<13> Jet: yep
<8> ok so if my dedicated server has 5 public IPs...then I can generate a total of 4 SSL certs bound to 4 different domains right?
<13> that's why anyone who needs a specific cert for their own site MUST get an IP address or be the FIRST site listed on that server, which means the rest will return the 'error' you spoke of
<13> xtor: so long as the IPs don't change, nor the domain names, yes
<8> I think I am confusing people here...let me clarify...
<13> there is no confusion
<0> xtor; you have 5 IPs, you can have 5 SSL certificates. dunno how you got 4 from that.
<13> this is how SSL works
<8> peer--well isnt one IP "wasted" running the main regular apache website?
<0> that can have SSL also
<8> I see
<9> hehe, almost all our Intel-based servers are running in vmware now
<0> and, whats the 'main regular' website? they are all equal in the eyes of httpd
<9> everything except Intel-servers in the DMZ are in virtual machines
<8> Is this a limitation of apache or is it just the nature of SSL
<9> very cool
<0> its the nature of SSL
<13> xtor: the first site on any IP ***igned will have the SSL ***igned to it, so if the name of the cert doesn't match the domain name it will throw an error like Jet said
<0> the cert has the hostname AND IP in it.
<0> if either don't match, it will break.
<0> https: doesn't support vhosts
<9> well, the browser will warn visitors
<13> Jet: right
<8> because all I really need to do is have the ability to serve pages via https rather than http for certain web pages thats all. No PUBLIC trusted certificates are needed
<9> IE7 won't go to the site at all unless you click "take me here anyway (this is really really really really dangerous!)"
<0> if browser security is set high, it will fail with a hard error, not a warning.
<9> xtor: um
<9> yes, a public trusted cert is required
<9> if you don't want the browser complaining
<9> or are you going to self-sigh
<9> sign
<8> dont those certs cost money?
<9> and give the CA to the visitors
<13> it needs to trace back to a valid CA's certificate or be self signed
<0> well, you can generate your own ROOT-CA and get your users to accept it via a .crt link, then everything you've signed will be accepted
<8> damn this is complicated
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#hardware
Banned Temporary K-line 4320 min
#freebsd
#unixhelp
#politics
#politics
#microsoft
#politics
lln-videos.metacafe
#nhl
|
|