| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Comments:
<0> so what peerce
<0> you can't ship primary and secondary explosives in the same truck
<0> it's an NTSB regulation
<1> Winfnfo uhh
<1> tha don't work that link
<2> I've downloaded a .00 file and suspect it's a compressed file. However i tried a number of archivers and none seem to be able to open the file. Are there any identification apps that can identify a file without looking at the extension ?
<0> .001?
<1> rar
<0> yeah .001 == .rar
<0> http://www.rarlabs.com
<2> Didn't open in winrar for me.
<1> WinRAR
<0> then it's not a rar
<3> hehe look at the comic http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/announcements/april-fools-comment-dump-164418.php
<0> stop downloading goat porn from russia
<2> I guess the other possibility is that the archive is corrupted.
<3> IT BURNS!
<0> oh **** it is april fools
<0> lol
<4> or that its only part of a archive
<5> hello, is it normal sometimes that every 3rd 4th ping to my router, is -185ms ?
<5> or is this a hardware error on my computer?
<6> robert83a - it probably indicates a problem with your router actually. something is happening on it every 3rd or 4th ping to cause it to delay sending the ping back
<4> -185 means it arrived bbefore it was sent?!?
<6> if there was a network issue, such as cabling, it wouldn't be on such a precise schedule
<6> oh, minus 185?
<6> ok, got me there :)
<5> yes
<5> sorry, this is the first time I see something like this
<7> i want that router
<5> and I run a 135comp lan
<5> maybe it's not the router
<8> 135 computers! makes you an expert.
<5> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15398295
<5> GrabLife : no it does not
<8> the time reported by 'ping' is simply the difference between two packets.
<5> -185 is kinda not normal
<5> Using this marvell onboard 1000mbit ethernet card on my DFI lanparty mobo
<0> are you having issues
<0> or just random ping returns
<6> try recalibrating the temporal displacement network junction!
<5> Gimp-Cow : no issues the network works fine, it's just interesting
<0> prolly just a software bug
<0> it's all good
<5> but reading that site, it says a AMD X2 cpu problem with ping.exe
<5> and I happen to have one of them in my pc
<5> thanx anyway people , things happen :)
<0> there ya go, software problem =)
<0> ping.exe prolly isn't threadsafe or something
<4> is it speccific to othe X2, or just any SMP system?
<3> http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/inspired-case-mod-of-a-womans-torso-164293.php
<6> I think we should really explore the implications to our timeline
<4> i have sevveral dual xeon systemms, ping works fine
<6> there could be temperal-aware aliens at work
<5> peerce : I think it's a X2 then
<6> temporal too
<3> veggie tempora
<3> mmm
<5> no other system has this problem, Xeon works for me fine to
<5> it's probably a ping thing, because ping www.google.com that has around 50ms-100ms , works fine
<5> only the router that has a avarage ms of 4ms shows this...
<5> by the way this a windows xp sp2 , fully updated...
<6> Barsky - time-hopping brocolli?
<4> a router on a local ethernet should be about 0-1mS
<3> as long as it's breaded and deep fried, why not ;-)
<5> peerce : unfortunately my network is not that simple :)
<4> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.119/0.125/0.130/0.009 ms
<5> peerce : it's trough a wireless connection , 4km away so 4ms is ok
<4> and thats on a 10baseT
<4> oh.
<4> wireless is a mess
<5> not really
<5> got around 60KM covered with wireless
<5> in the vicinity of this city
<5> around 40 object
<5> 2 of them 75,35 computers
<5> monthy approx 1-2 wireless problems, need to turn off/on and that's it
<5> though the wireless bridge routing problem takes time to get used to... f*c*
<5> anyone else using wireless here?
<9> in myhouse
<4> i'm using 802.11g in my house at the moment
<9> not professionally
<5> I'm having this issue with all wireless bridge's I tried out
<5> linksys, pheenet ... :)
<5> the bridge routes, without a default gw , it wont allow traffic to public side of firewall
<5> and only trough wireless lan
<5> on wired lan you can access public side of firewall (so routing is okay)
<5> and I thought the bridges, are kinda like swtiches only need ip for management
<5> maybe this is a marketing thing for wireless bridges
<5> as , bridge in bridges wireleess wired lan, not the cl***ic bridge
<5> you can check this thing with just 2 wireless bridges
<4> why aren't you routing subnets instead of bridging?
<5> peerce : I'm routing my subnets, but some clients are behind 2 wireless bridges
<5> the wireless bridges cause the problem, because they are not working like a bridge at all
<5> they route...
<4> well, you can route or bridge over wireless, but bridging breaks down if the complexity goes above 1 hop
<5> I only have 2 pairs of wireless bridges connected together at any time
<10> whoa. the ogrish video of the paul dana crash has just about every camera angle.
<5> "wireless bridge" is 1 Device
<5> it's not like 2 wireless units conenceted together, and a bridge at both sites is present
<5> hope you don't think that :)
<5> the unit is called wireless bridge, pheenet wireless bridge
<4> yah, i kknow, the terminology is conofusing. a wireless bridge is really a wireless point to point link
<4> and can be a IP bridge OR route
<5> 802.11b bridge
<5> peerce : yeah, sorry
<5> point -to -point
<11> OMG.
<11> Coffee.
<11> Mmmmmm.
<5> peerce : so the problem is that it routes, do you by chance know how it can be stopped from trying to route packets?
<0> they don't route
<4> well it can be stopped lots of ways :D
<5> yes they do
<0> how so?
<5> at least my pheenet , linksys
<4> microwave interference... weather...
<10> Sunspots!
<5> because it needs a gw to allow clients behind it to go to other side of primary router
<0> uh
<4> routed networks need to know the routes, yes.
<0> you have a strange setup
<5> if wireless bridge has no gw, the client behind it can only ping local side of router interface for example 192.168.1.250
<5> and not 192.168.10.10
<4> if its more complex than a couple static hops, you should be using OSPF or BGP to manage the routing
<5> using ripd
<0> you shouldn't be using linksys with multiple subnets
<5> yeah maybe that is the problem...
<5> the wireless...
<0> you don't have enough devices
<4> hopefully he's using openwrt or somoething similar. stockc linksys firmware is shiett
<0> just use one range
<0> openwrt has nothing to do with bridges peerce
<5> I've stoped using linksys devices....using only pheenet now
<4> no, but if he's got multiple routes and multiple bridges, it would be able to route it if setup properly. I doubt youou could get that working with stock firmware
<9> belkin r0x the house biotch
<3> wtf. english site trying to install a language pack? dumb***es
<5> I'm gona do a small ascii art ,and paste it for better understanding :)
<5> see http://pastebin.com/634384 , it's not that complex at all, as it seems.
<5> (maybe i was fooled by the name wireless "bridge")
<5> (it's probably a marketing term then)
<0> a bridge is a stupid device
<0> it just forwards ****
<0> it's basically a media converter
<5> and not the birdge i'm used to when creating a real bridge under windows , or linux.
<0> that's different
<5> the bridge = that is almost equal to switch
<5> damn!
<0> yeah
<0> well it's like
<0> fiber to cat5
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
geltay
anti-violent rap songs
#hardware
#beginner
#nhl
#gamedev
#opengl
#beginner
nexh.ob
#heroin
|
|