| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> hehe
<0> wow, flukex bites back
<1> lol
<2> anyone alive? got a quick question
<2> i have slackware running on this system, been running for over 4 years with a hitch
<2> i hant o upgrade to gentoo but this system cant go down for too long since too many people relay on this computer to be on
<2> so if I was to install vmware on here and set it to a physiscal drive and install gentoo in that, configure it and once all done reboot/boot into thr new system
<2> woudl that work?
<2> or would i need gsx server? (i am not even sure what gsx/esx server does)
<2> anyone?
<3> would prolly work
<3> but if u have a over 4 years old server buy a new one :)
<1> rubasu. I don't think either workstation or gsx let you use a raw disk
<1> and uhm, you can't just install esx on top of your current distro, it's now how it works.
<4> haha
<4> he can try tho
<1> you're a ****ing fairy, bitbyte :)
<1> giggle away, biatch!
<4> !kick diztorted
<4> :P
<1> wow
<1> that wasn't a blatant abuse of ill begotten status
<1> :p
<4> yes it was
<4> haha
<1> dude
<1> listen to this
<4> jes?
<4> digame ese
<1> I'm trying to instill a cultural change amongst the web cluebies
<1> trying to get them to move from doing every goddamn website on a seperate ip to using url parsing in iis and apache
<1> I finally turn the corner on this particular task
<4> headers
<1> because there's no need for a webservers to have 5 ****ing ip's
<1> and one of the web ntac's (no talent ***clown) has the sac to ask me if doing it that way is going to increase load.
<1> Like either apache or iis is going to spend more time looking at the header to determine which virtual server to send it to vs. using individual ip's
<4> did you give him a laod in his ***?
<1> And I just said so
<1> I really am beginning to hate people
<1> if I didn't have a meeting with McDATA today, I don't think I'd go into work
<1> luckily, it appears that our local guy here, who jumped at the idea to change from IP's to headers, has my back
<1> the dude in virginia can get anally stuffed for all I care
<1> nobody likes him :x
<1> argh, I do need to go in today.. I have 20 ****ing things to finish up today. sigh
<5> what was my quit reason someone pls
<1> ..[signoff.#VMware(EmAnOn_)] [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
<5> [16:41] * [10053] Software caused connection abort
<5> keep getting this happening
<5> tis annoying
<1> indeed
<0> dont ask us for support
<0> thats an irc/irc client question
<4> yeah dammit
<6> darky_wrk?
<0> yo
<6> [20:48] <0> mPulse: it is now your job to help him
<0> oh right
<0> did he ever show up in #microsoft?
<6> FluKex did
<6> :p
<6> the other ****e, no, dont think so
<6> :p
<6> i think that one is more suiting
<6> nway
<6> i've an appointment
<6> with a pint of lager
<6> oh ya
<6> DRINK
<0> haha
<0> nice
Return to
#vmware
or
Go to some related
logs:
inetel pentium D vs core duo
#politics
#nhl
pop connector+torrent
#politics
#heroin
what is tcp_conn_req_max_q
#computers
#gentoo
#gentoo
|
|