| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Comments:
<0> roy, how I am connected?
<0> Connected through ADSL.
<0> if that is what you mean
<1> interesting
<0> pppoe
<1> are you in an office or is this at your home
<1> ?
<0> when the error happens im at office
<1> ok
<0> im always at the office
<0> :P
<0> why?
<1> you have a proxy server/firewall in your office
<1> and that is blocking your access
<1> so you need to talk to your office it people
<1> if this were happening at home i'd say it's an issue with your service provider, and that might be more difficult to get resolved
<0> ummmm
<0> alright Sir
<0> thank you
<0> :)
<1> good luck
<0> I will try my buds! :)
<1> talk to whoever maintains your network at the office
<0> thanks
<0> :)
<2> anywhere i can get cool dot files for my solaris?
<2> there used to be this place dotfiles.com or something
<2> i can't find it anymore
<3> dot files to do what
<2> .login .profile .cshrc
<2> well
<2> mainly just .cshrc
<3> oh. so prompts?
<2> the skel .files are lame
<3> i dunno
<2> maybe i'm not looking hard enough but the skel they gave me in my home dir are so bare i can barely find **** in my path
<3> i just use bash / PS1="\\h:\\w\\\$ " for everything
<2> hahah
<2> my terminal settings all that
<2> i've had to do it all by hand
<2> and it's good now i just wanted to grab a phatty .zshrc or something
<3> i thought you were using csh
<2> i can steal stuff from a good .zshrc
<2> i'm actualy using tcsh
<0> when they speak of code portability between openbsd and linux what kind of code for example would work on openbsd and not on linux? isn't a code a code?
<0> can you give me an example?
<2> different libraries and stuff
<2> different kernel
<2> use perl if you want portability :)
<1> bsd-specific stuff vs. sysv-specific stuff
<1> perl is The Mother of All That is Evil(tm)
<3> rubys not too bad
<2> ohh man
<2> don't be hatin on my perl now
<4> thanks buddy
<2> translate spanish i love perl
<4> amo el Perl
<3> i write perl that looks like c. I cant figure out what the hell my scripts are doing, nor what i was thinking a year later, even with comments.
<2> gribits kick rocks
<4> I gotta go fix some oracle ****, bbiaf
<3> dont even get me started on other peopels perl.
<1> no hate - just a disp***ionate statement of fact
<2> my perl is fine
<1> i'll concede that it's perl scripters that are more the problem than perl itself
<2> well perl is for all people
<1> but perl seems to magnetically attract the lowest of the low
<2> that's the beauty of it
<2> it can be as simple or as complicated as you want it to be
<2> for all levels
<2> any fool can slap something together
<2> something useful even
<2> i've done some pretty amazing stuff in perl that i would never be able to do in c or c++
<2> well it would take me weeks probably in c
<5> there is one guy here doing tcl expect scripts with ftp cause he has never heard of ncftp.
<3> or lftp
<5> and if one ftp fails in his scripts the rest will fail.
<5> and apparently this one person is dedicated to that.. for why: they are clueless.
<3> at least theyll be good at tcl/expect
<5> not like thats hard ;-)
<3> harder than installing ncftp
<5> I've come to understand that this company has hired multiple clueless people cause they couldn't find one or two clueful people ;-)
<3> then theyre doomed to cluelessnes.
<3> darwin will take care of them
<5> potentially.
<5> they've hired some clueful people who are pointing out their idiocy, though the boss just seems to ignore it until it comes up again.
<6> ermm.. bah.. file completion matching is easier under readline..
<2> mouring where's a good place to get .files?
<2> remember that site that would have user submitted dot files?
<6> um... no clue why would one share their .files
<2> you're the type of person that just writes their own i suppose
<6> you refering to shell startup scripts? I keep them down to a small amount.
<2> yeah .login .profile etc
<2> i've got this .cshrc i've been draggin around for a while
<2> but it's meant for bsd not solaris
<2> just gotta change the path up a little
<2> probably other solaris specific things i should do
<2> /usr/ccs/bin
<2> solaris puts stuff in the weirdest places
<2> ok so it's not that bad
<7> i think the defaul .profile files are found in the /etc/skel directory
<7> but for the user its usually stored in their home dir
<2> yeah
<2> they are bare bones
<2> i got it handled i just wanted to find the dot file website
<2> if it still existed
<7> google it
<7> : )
<2> i've been googling
<2> i google for everything
<2> how to tie my shoes better, etc
<6> oohh.. happy..happy.. primative tab completion.
<6> bah.. bloody hell.. what i this put_u32 ****..
<8> Does ipf take affect before snoop sees packets?
<8> e.g. if I block something in IPF, should snoop see it?
<8> ...I'd think not...
<0> can anyone tell me why openvpn requires to generate deffie hellman parameter?
<0> why is that part necessary?
<6> Sounds like you are doing pre-share keys.
<0> yes
<0> can you elaborate a bit please
<6> not really I don't use openvpn... I just know the theory in the style.
<1> ipf is bpf-based, isn't it?
<8> err...ask Darren Reed. I have no idea
<8> dhartmei would know
<1> well if it is and you're using a pre-input filter it's definitely going to see it before anyone else has a chance to
<1> i like pf btw
<0> there is another problem that I found while analyzing packets using ethereal
<0> the traffic is not encrypted
<0> I can see the html contents transferred between client and server
<0> but I generated keys for server and clients
<1> i really really liked bsdi's ipfw and worked really hard to get sources released when darren pulled his crap on openbsd, but alas, the legal staff at wrs could not make things move quickly enough
<0> is there any configuration option to encrypt the messages?
<1> pf has become a farily worthy alternative to bsdi's ipfw (which has no relation whatsoever to that ipfw crap on freebsd)
<8> Yep
<8> I'd use it if I could, but I can't, so I don't
<0> ?
<8> Solaris
<9> rsprio: that's what ssl is for.
<9> (https)
<8> roycroft: I think that snoop actually does attach before IPF.
<8> I'm blocking a host
<8> and IPF shows the accunting as updated (e.g. the rules are being hit), but I still see the traffic under snoop[
<8> There are also are only inbound packets on the box with IPF, whereas on a similar box, there are both inbound and outbound packets
<10> How would I mount/access my zip drived ?
<11> mount
<11> Navrax: have you looked online? what specific part of the process are you stuck on?
<10> the actual dirwhere my zip drive is
<11> it will be in a directory when you mount it. Did you mount it yet? Do you see it in dmesg?
Return to
#unixhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
i like soccer moms
#stocks
dmichk /.
scp /scannow
#computers
#politics
#sex
#winxp
#sex
will dream that he has fallen
|
|