| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> % time {list [lindex $list $i]]}
<0> 18 microseconds per iteration
<1> run it multiple times
<1> not just once :)
<1> time {lrange $list $i $i} 1000
<2> thommey: #1177 (341 clicks) Tcl: 02:25
<1> possible it is slower because it needs to read out $i twice
<1> I used "0" for testing
<0> ok
<0> i'm making it as lifelike as possible
<0> using all the variables i used in the proc
<1> :)
<1> new challenge: shorten the code to 200byte
<1> :)
<0> set list [list a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9];set i 6
<0> set avg(lrange) 0; set avg(list) 0
<0> for {set x 0} {$x < 100} {incr x} { incr avg(lrange) [lindex [time {lrange $list $i $i]}] 0] }
<0> for {set x 0} {$x < 100} {incr x} { incr avg(list) [lindex [time {list [lindex $list $i]]}] 0] }
<0> set avg(lrange) [expr {$avg(lrange) / 100.0}]
<0> set avg(list) [expr {$avg(list) / 100.0}]
<0> puts "lrange average is: $avg(lrange) microseconds per iteration\nlist+lindex average is: $avg(list) microseconds per iteration"
<2> [GRiMMY]: #9 (483 clicks) Tcl: 6
<2> [GRiMMY]: #10 (229 clicks) Tcl: 0
<0> thats my speed test code
<2> [GRiMMY]: #13 (278 clicks) Tcl: 0.0
<2> [GRiMMY]: #14 (290 clicks) Tcl: 0.0
<2> [GRiMMY]: #15 (stdout) lrange average is: 0.0 microseconds per iteration
<2> [GRiMMY]: #15 (stdout) list+lindex average is: 0.0 microseconds per iteration
<1> #rename rename r
<1> #r proc p
<1> #r set s
<1> ;)
<0> lrange average is: 0.0 microseconds per iteration
<0> list+lindex average is: 6.17 microseconds per iteration
<0> and lrange is ALOT quicker
<1> ha :)
<0> and since its gonna be used over 10million times
<0> that should shave off a bit of time
<0> test time
<0> woah! it took 3s longer
<1> hm
<0> thommey, know anything about C?
<1> little bit
<0> not enough then
<0> lol
<1> hehe
<1> :)
<1> can't deal with lists
<0> woulda showed ya a C library that does it in a few millisecs
<1> too much pointer stuff
<1> :)
<1> hehe :)
<3> =)
<0> =)
<0> why do C programmers never comment properly
<1> lol
<1> do YOU comment properly?
<1> do you make weekly backups of your important data?
<1> welcome to dreamland ;)
<0> lol
<1> internet explorer-coders seem to refuse comments too
<1> sixth developer team or something like that gave up when trying to understand the core code
<1> at least that's the rumor :)
<0> lol
<0> i actually comment fairly well
<1> and the leaked w2k-source-part had more than 10 /* EVIL HACK */ in it
<1> :)
<1> and some insults
<1> ;)
<3> heh
<4> u want comments? switch to java then :p
<4> there's javadoc there
<4> :)
<1> http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Computers#Windows_2000_source_code
<1> :)
<0> hmph
<1> there's some software for C-projects as well like that
<1> ha
<1> found the report on it
<1> http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/archive/index.php/t-46375.html
<1> and easier to read - version http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/2/15/71552/7795 ;)
<0> thommey, know python?
<1> nah
<1> tcl and vb only
<1> :)
<1> bit php, but that's nothing special
<0> hmph
<0> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/190465
<0> looks like it would be quick
Return to
#tcl
or
Go to some related
logs:
#delphi
#goal
Whit3Wolf
superscript directly above subscript microsoft word
cmnn.ob
quakenet+openbsd+channel
#politics
#politics
#politics
#politics
|
|