| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Comments:
<0> i had nfi
<0> but the bin laden family is akin to how the rockfellers are here
<0> but if john d wasn't ap hiliontropist
<0> heh. you think bin laden would buy google ads to forward to there company or somethin
<0> there makret cap is probably 80-90 billion
<0> you nkow there making the worlds largest building
<0> and financed it
<0> http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=182168
<1> Tiny URL: http://tinyurl.com/5u29p (URL by kaberfood)
<2> yeah burj dubai
<0> and in that movie siriyana, i bet most of those royal princes and stuff are like that
<0> just chilling on there yachts
<0> and ****ing fine *** women
<0> lol
<3> you know it
<0> yea
<3> for the most part, the middle east is filled with ignorant people
<4> yep
<3> only the upper crust are educated
<4> even worse.. jealous ones
<3> and, they're also the most westernized
<0> the upper upper crust
<3> they know what's up
<0> i would never hook up with one of those princess those. ****ign psycho brotehrs
<0> brother
<0> s
<3> it's been like that since the beginning of time over there
<3> 3000 year old dystopia
<0> just scary. those guys have diplomatic immunity too
<0> and the women
<3> if you have money you can get away with almost anything
<0> not with dipolmatic immunity
<0> lol
<3> diplomatic immunity doesn't mean invincible
<0> yea it does
<3> in fact one ****up may cause someone to lose their immunity status
<0> you can go on a killing spree and do whatever you want adn get off scott free
<3> uhh no you can't
<0> yea you can
<0> read about saudi royalty in boston
<3> do you even know anyone with that kind of immunity?
<3> it can be revoked
<0> search stuff like dwi saudi boston
<3> if abused
<0> or somethin akin to that
<0> you'll be suprised
<0> or saudi royalty four seasons
<0> but oh well. they where born into that ****
<4> maybe we need $100 oil price per barrel
<4> they say the true economic cost of crude oil should be well over $100 a barrel
<3> maybe we need to stop buying oil in USD
<0> that'd change the standard of living for ev1
<3> and let china take over
<3> lol
<0> heh
<2> scheduled to be completed in 2008
<4> doesn't matter what currency you use
<2> like i said, we could (should) be completely free from oil by now
<4> the problem is the amount of energy you get (and the products crude oil makes) is incredibly cheap
<4> other other technology can compete
<2> wrong
<4> no way is the internal combustion engine obsolete
<4> panini: oh?
<2> yes
<2> oh, for cars...
<2> i meant for electricity generation
<4> not just for cars but everything else too
<4> well for electrical, nuclear is currently the cheapest
<2> for that, nuclear beats everything else, hands down
<4> hell ya
<2> you can't put nuke in a car, but all your power plants could be nuke
<2> AND if you had nuke power, you could make hydrogen fuel cells easily for cars
<4> oh that's a differnt storey
<2> so cars would have zero pollution
<4> actually fuel cells are misleading
<2> and you are completely free of oil
<3> i bet you the saudis already bought up the next big energy supply
<4> the cost of making hydrogen
<2> rob_b: nope
<2> the next big energy is nuke
<3> how do you know?
<2> because they haven't bought nuke
<3> for cars?
<2> fuel cell for cars
<3> hydrogen cells are not a form of nuclear energy
<2> nobody said they were
<3> we're talking about oil here
<4> for equivalent energy it takes like 6 gallons of gas to make 1 gallon of hydrogen (equivalent energy)
<5> you guys are 100% wrong
<2> yes, if you're stupid enough to use gas for that
<5> it's not nuclear, it's NUKULAR
<3> many power plants are nuclear
<3> it's not "new" technology
<2> but if you had nukes, fuel cells can be made cheaply
<2> it's new to the US
<2> because liberal stopped all development of nuke in the US
<2> +s
<2> i'm talking about the new style nuke reactors, the ones which burn nearly 100% of the nuclear fuel
<2> not the old style reactors, which burn only 5% of the fuel, and leave 95% as radioactive waste
<3> the liberals?
<4> http://www.rps.psu.edu/hydrogen/price.html
<2> correct
<3> you mean the environmentalists?
<1> Tiny URL: http://tinyurl.com/bfnqw (URL by Super_BQ)
<2> th enviro-wackos, yes
<4> panini
<4> nukes won't solve the problem to fuel cells
<3> panini you need to do some reading, because the state of california is 99% nuclear powered
<3> the problem with fuel cells currently is that it's difficult to contain hydrogen safely
<2> Super_BQ: yes it will. the url you posted even says that
<2> rob_b: LOL!
<2> rob you are HIGHLY misinformed, i'm afraid
<3> compressed hydrogen gas will leak out of most containers because the size of each atom is tiny
<3> am i?
<3> http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/at_a_glance/states/statesca.html
<1> Tiny URL: http://tinyurl.com/9wxu4 (URL by rob_b)
<4> The conclusion of the committee that authored the report? A transition to a hydrogen economy is, at best, decades away.
<4> Considine agrees. "We have a long way to go."
<4> "Right now, producing hydrogen is expensive and energy intensive. It takes about six gallons of gasoline to make and compress a little over two pounds of hydrogen, which carries about the same amount of energy as a gallon of gasoline."
<2> <3> panini you need to do some reading, because the state of california is 99% nuclear powered <- m***ive ignorance
<0> man terra patrick is a hotty
<2> the vast majority of electricity in california is generated by natural gas
<4> and we also need to compare the cost of an internal combustion engine vs. a hydrogen fuel cell power plant
<3> panini: no you're right, i read that chart wrong
<4> I thought California also imports power?
<3> the part that says "less than 1%"
<2> even the url YOU posted confirms that nuke is only 19%, not 99%
<3> california imports power from british columbia hydro
<4> rob_b: thought
<4> thought so
<4> because that's my homeland
<3> so it's difficult to tell how much is actually generated in the state
<2> no it isn't
<2> the chart gives it right there
<4> close friend works for the power board in BC
<0> http://www.clubtera.com/galleries/8.jpg
<2> kaber?
<0> hot girl
<2> she's a porn star
<0> yes i know
<2> why did you post that?
<0> cuase its' work safe and she's hot
<3> Super_BQ: i'm from BC
<3> originally
<3> we didn't get that energy rebate that was promised because enron ****ed us over
<4> yikes.. scary!
<4> rob: damn.
<0> she's marreid
<2> Super_BQ: as I said, it's extremely inefficient to make fuel cells by burning gas...
<0> must be all old videos online then
<4> Ballard Power making any $?
Return to
#stocks
or
Go to some related
logs:
#heroin
#unixhelp
#gamedev
ewean gay
#sex
crash vmdk
#computers
#worldcup
icekreamspalace
saydaley
|
|
