| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Comments:
<port> what?
<port> jsda?
<port> or drs?
<rend> yeah
<rend> jsda
<port> yup
<rend> getting coverage
<port> coverage
<port> yeah
<rend> maybe time to get in
<port> awesome
<port> it is
<port> Longbow is small
<port> but who cares
<port> others will come
<rend> then why are you selling it? ;)
<port> sush!
<port> im not
<port> :P
<rend> haha, initiated at neutral
<Hedgie> longbow says neutral
<port> yeah well
<port> dug
<rend> hahaha
<port> duh
<port> they just got there
<Hedgie> We are initiating coverage of Jones Soda with a NEUTRAL rating. On one
<Hedgie> hand, we believe significant growth opportunities lie ahead for JSDA.
<Hedgie> However, in our opinion the company's valuation leaves the shares with
<Hedgie> limited upside from current levels.
<Hedgie> The company's flagship Jones Soda line is currently carried in only
<Hedgie> one-third of domestic retail store locations, leaving ample room for
<Hedgie> expanded distribution. Also, JSDA's portfolio offers retailers 4x+
<Hedgie> greater margins on average versus national soft drink brands.
<rend> i agree with them about the high valuations
<port> yeh
<port> but
<port> its all about growth
<Hedgie> JSDA's successful test launch of Jones Organics in 2005 could set the
<Hedgie> stage for impressive growth in consumer recognition and retailer
<Hedgie> acceptance. That said, Jones Organics is currently a "green banana" story
<Hedgie> which faces the formidable challenge of building brand equity in a
<Hedgie> relatively non-established category.
<port> thats why its neutural
<rend> .qx jsda
<Enhanced> .qx JSDA (last: 9.72 -3.86%) (4.15 - 11.55) (EPS: 0.056) (div: none) (O/S: 22,117,000) (float: 20,262,000)
<rend> .qx pozn
<Enhanced> .qx POZN (last: 6.13 +10.87%) (5.26 - 18.62) (EPS: 0.031) (div: none) (O/S: 29,160,000) (float: 22,482,000)
<port> i ahve 4k in there
<port> have*
<port> i thikn thats wnough
<port> enough
<Hedgie> * JSDA currently trades at 95x our 2007 estimate of $0.11. Even using a PEG
<Hedgie> ratio, the company is valued at 3.4x versus a 2.0x average multiple for
<Hedgie> its beverage peers. In comparison, Hansen Natural possesses a PEG ratio
<Hedgie> of 0.6x despite a much larger earnings base versus JSDA.
<Hedgie> hahah
<Hedgie> 95x 07
<Hedgie> nuts
<Hedgie> 3.4x PEG
<port> yeayh
<rend> jsda is too high for me
<port> cause faggy cramer
<port> pumped it
<port> morom
<port> moron
<rend> cramer did?
<port> yeah man
<rend> no way
<port> he called it on stocksunderten
<rend> freaking cramer pick
<rend> hahah, that moron
<port> yup
<port> it went from 7.30 to $11
<port> crazy
<rend> lol
<BumCheese> when is JSDA going to rebound
<port> !return 7.30 11
<Stocks> The Return rate for 7.30 -> 11 is: 50.6849315068%
<port> !return 7.30 11.00
<Stocks> The Return rate for 7.30 -> 11.00 is: 50.6849315068%
<port> yup
<port> craz
<port> it was actually a ibt more
<Hedgie> In comparison, Hansen Natural (HANS -
<Hedgie> BUY), which contains a near 20% share in the $2.5+ billion energy drink
<Hedgie> category, possesses a PEG ratio of 0.6x despite a much larger earnings base
<Hedgie> versus JSDA. In conclusion, we believe JSDA's impressive growth potential is
<Hedgie> already factored into the share price. We therefore see limited near-term
<Hedgie> upside and are initiating coverage with a NEUTRAL rating.
<Hedgie> hrm
<port> yeh
<port> they know man
<port> these guys will be big
<port> one day
<Hedgie> jones?
<port> and thats how its been
<rend> port, why is it that he would say he did 25% a year at his hedge fund, yet he does so ****ty in his action alerts plus account. even before the big drops we had, he was at 17%, about the same as many mutual funds
<port> NO
<port> MSFT
<jcv> afk
<port> who do u think im talking about
<port> :))
<port> rend shoe me a 17% mutual fund
<port> :)
<rend> if msft keeps going down, bill gates will no longer be the richest man :)
<port> show*
<rend> port: let me check
<port> j
<port> ok
<port> rend
<port> and
<port> it depends when
<port> after 9/11 doesn't count
<port> lol
<rend> port, actually it was an index fund
<port> everything went up after the 9/11 rebound
<port> s&P climbed 50%
<port> more
<rend> they have been going to **** lately: VEURX
<rend>
<rend> Vanguard European Stock Index Fund
<rend>
<rend> 25.44
<rend>
<rend> 100.0000
<rend>
<rend> 27.0%
<rend>
<rend> 29.61
<rend>
<rend> -0.46
<rend>
<rend> -1.53%
<rend>
<rend> 2,961.00
<rend>
<rend> +417.00
<rend>
<c|ear> how does rasing rates fight inflation?
<rend> 16.39%
<port> c|ear CPI goes lower
<port> goto inflationdata.com
<c|ear> cpi?
<Longbow2> i say majik
<port> if u want to learn how
<port> CONSUMER
<port> PRICE
<port> INDEX
<Longbow2> heh
<port> U TRADE AND U DONT KNOW WHAT CPI IS?
Return to
#stocks
or
Go to some related
logs:
T1000 scadm
#politics
#sunos
#delphi
#red
amoot debian
#linux-noob
#beginner
#nhl
|
|
