| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Comments:
<0> pretty speedy thing
<1> looks fast
<0> well it's a good eye catcher
<1> no power windows though, wtf
<0> haha no, they weigh too much :)
<0> it only weighs 870kg
<1> not much at all
<1> i have a tumor that weighs more than that
<0> I bet
<1> heh, thanks, i think
<0> goes in 5.9s to 100km/h
<1> not too bad
<0> no, especially if you consider the price
<1> which is
<0> only 22000 euro tax incl (taxes are 21% here)
<0> so 18150 or thereabouts
<1> not much at all
<0> nope, I agree
<1> you got rid of the other one?
<0> yeah, could buy this one from what I got from the other
<1> heh, good
<0> yeah :)
<1> i never was a fan of the other
<0> it's the most speedy thing I've ever driven
<1> this one
<1> the other one looked alright though. at least you couldn't see the pedals
<1> i mean, the bicycle pedals
<1> sounded better in my head.
<1> brb
<0> yeah the old one was a bit of a dressed up city car, this one's a real sports car
<2> I dont know if this is apropriet, but is there a specific version of MSSQL server needed for clustering? and if so, what kind of price would I be looking at for 2 nodes?
<3> Idle`: look on microsoft.com ...
<2> been trying to, they have alot of 'SQL server can cluster', but nothing specific about versions
<3> they have a 'version to version' comparison chart ... clustering would be on there is it were version dependant ;)
<4> i think you can rule out expres
<2> nm,got it
<2> :)
<2> SouLShocK: definately. :)
<2> I've gotta compare MSclustering to Linux clustering. SQL server for the backend
<4> linux clustering with what?
<3> SQL Server clustering with linux ... doesn't sound ... possible ;)
<2> zoul_: lol, no no
<2> vs MySQL, etc
<2> I need to look into postgre and oracle too probably
<5> is it effective to store large binary content (csv content with 7 coluwn and 1000 rows) into sql binary coluwn?
<5> store many binary coluwns of that binary csv)
<3> Idle`: I can tell you now ... sql server will do alot more then mysql ...
<3> oracle will out perform postgres ... and mysql ...
<3> if your options include oracle or sql server ... don't bother with postgres or mysql
<3> oracle on linux will perform better then oracle on windows ...
<3> but oracle and sql server are pretty comparable to each other, depending on the enviroment you put oracle in ...
<3> oracle can out perform sql server in some things, and vice-versa ... all depends on what your doing really ;)
<2> zoul_: 1 sec, brb
<3> and oracle and sql server have two completely and totally different 'dba' types (as far as people go) ... sql server dba's are cheaper then oracle dba's ... but sql server dba's tend to be more 'egotistical' ... where as oracle db'as are more arrogant (look at RJarret)
<3> :)
<2> I was under the impression MSSQL was lmited to 8 cluster nodes
<3> Idle`: doubtful ... that -MAY- be version dependant ... just like MS's Server OS's ... depending on how much you give them, depends on how much crap you can do with it ... but otherwise, it's the same source code ;)
<2> :)
<2> well, I know Windows 2003, in datacenter edition, can only get to 8 machines in 'true' clustering, which is required for MSSQL, is it not?
<3> *shrug* ... I don't cluster;)
<2> :)
<2> holy crap is oracle expensive.... $17,000/CPU
<3> :)
<2> oh, thats 4 cpus for 17,000
<2> thats not _too_ bad... I guess.... depending...
<3> :)
<2> hehe
<6> Hallo
<6> I just wanted to make sure, can one use multiple MINUS in one query?
<6> and they will just chain in order?
<6> select a.id minus select b.id minus select c.id?
<6> in Oracle sql
<2> if I wanted to deploy MySQL for a corporate website, clustered, what is the difference between just downloading it off the developer section and buying it in their store? is MySQL not free for corporations?
<2> errr
<2> ignore that
<7> lol
<3> Idle`: MySQLAB, is a company that creates MySQL ... the open-source and corporate (non-opensource) versions of MySQL are greatly different ... the Open Source MySQL eventually contains everything the MySQLAB version does, but not nearly as quickly ...
<7> like
<7> 5 years later
<7> oooh look we have sql joins
<7> and aggregates
<3> l
<3> :)
<7> :)
<2> zoul_: :)
<2> I meant that for another channel, accidently alt-4 instead of alt5.... :P but yea
<7> suuurreee
<7> thats what they all say
<2> well, being as I just said the same thing to #mysql... ;)
<7> suuure
<7> thats what they all say
<7> lol
<2> hehe
<3> hahah
<3> hrm ...
<3> my day is going to hopefully go by really quick ... haha ... already 11am ... feels like i just got here ... weeee!
<3> and it's sooo queit today too ... haha, no one's here! weee!
<8> hey zoul set me up that ftp account
<7> set us up the ftp bomb
<8> OMG HE SET US UP THE BOMB
<3> cojo, two secs
<3> Arrakis: you talk to damn much
<7> huh?
<7> u were talking more then me
<3> http://sql-servers.com/stats/
<3> notaccording to stats ... heh
<7> whoa
<7> thats weird
<7> i like hardly ever talk in here :-/ compared to other channels
<3> add up all my nicks stats though, I'm on top most likely
<7> my internet is moving reall slow
<7> that didnt evenwork
<3> Arrakis talks to him/herself a lot. He/She wrote over 5 lines in a row 25 times!
<3> Another lonely one was zoul, who managed to hit 9 times.
<7> hmm
<7> its just this computer :(
<3> yeah, all my nicks added up are 1689 ... I spoke a 'tad' more then you ...
<3> but damn, you still talk alot ...
<9> SQL Server 7/2000 - I need to select a couple of fields, a COUNT(*), a MAX(datefield), and the id field from the record the MAX(datefield) came from, from a table. Simple except for the last one, the ID field of the record the MAX(datefield) came from. How can I do this?
<10> What if there were multiple records that had the same MAX(datefield)
<10> Would you want multiple IDs back in that case?
<9> I've considered that... if that happens than I suppose I would want the MAX(idfield) of those.
<10> In that case you can SELECT max(id) FROM table WHERE datefield = (SELECT MAX(datefield) FROM table) to get your max date ID
<10> I don't know that you can get all of that data in 1 query
<9> I might be able to... I can do a (SELECT ...) AS blah in a SELECT's field list, can't I?
<9> Wow, that worked. And I didn't have to include the (SELECT ...) AS blah column in the outer SELECT's GROUP BY either.
<11> Hi
<11> Using ADO.NET 2.0 with MS SQL 2005, is there an automated way to create tables on the SQL server from tables in a dynamically generated Dataset ?
<8> ****in right
<8> go net go
<3> Lukky: try #C# or something, your question is related to .NET, not SQL Server ;)
<11> I guess you're right, though I know a lot of .NET developpers hang around here :-P
<3> alot of pedophile's are probably here too
<3> you don't see us talking about kiddie porn though, do you ?
<11> I'll leave those for your own use
<7> lol
<7> zoul - u just had to give away my deep secret
<8> we know about you sicko
<3> bleh
<9> SQL Server 7/2000 - If I have a table with an int identity field, can I ***ume that all records with an id less than a specific ID were created prior to the specific ID? Or could SQL Server reuse lower numbered IDs from rows that were deleted?
<12> You can change the seed with an alter table. So, the server won't automatically reuse them, but it could happen.
<12> ***ume nothing. )
<3> haha ... meat in arabic is "Lahma" ... lol
<13> you're lahma
<10> can someone explain how transaction logs get out of control? I just found a near 10gb trans log
<8> because they log all your transactions
<8> and you dont have a backup plan
<8> its simple really
<10> I thought they were only used while a transaction was uncommited
Return to
#sql
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
#beginner
largest countries in world + land mass
#beginner
#winvista
#computers
bluvirus
how to diffuse a bomb
pentium d-945 full load temperature
#goal
|
|