| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4
Comments:
<0> is it possible to delete cell datas while beeing in FlameRobin ?
<1> i dont think many people use that tool here
<1> but if you know the sql you can do anything you want.
<0> k, i dont ;)
<2> whats 'cell datas'
<3> Ihave migrated from mysql to sql server and encountered several syntax problems: Suppose I have field name 'Name', I cannot launch "SELECT t.Name='Tom-23' FROM MyTable t". Does anyone know how to solve this out? Isn't both SQL server and mysql are odbc?
<4> what?
<5> What is the purpose of that syntax?
<4> tom first off
<6> select * from manual where knowledge like 'how to select';
<5> The = operator makes no sense in that context
<6> Darken-: preempted!
<6> Halo_Four: a few SQL servers allow = as an overload for like
<4> learn what ODBC acronym means
<6> Halo_Four: mysql and mssql
<6> Halo_Four: which leads to that kind of badbear bull****
<4> Tom-23 also name might be a keyword
<6> i think jet does to, not sure
<6> too*
<6> Darken-: not in quotes it isn't
<5> = for the LIKE operator? MSSQL doesn't permit that. Neither does Access.
<6> huhu okay
<5> But even so that doesn't explain the context of = in the SELECT clause.
<4> StoneCyqh any way you put it, it IS a keyword
<4> you must tell the server to not interpret it as a keyword
<4> and explicitly as text
<5> Is that an attempt at an alias?
<6> no
<4> also StoneCyqh
<6> he's just screwing up the query
<4> it isn't quoted is it? no it isn't
<6> darken: Name='Tom-23' <-- that's not quoted?
<4> no
<6> or are we talking about seperate things?
<4> I'm talking about 1 thing and you are unable to read what I'm saying
<6> oh, his nick is also tom23
<6> hahahaha
<6> oh don't be a cock
<6> honestly
<4> don't try to make me look stupid in public because I'll make you look 10 times worse
<6> "and you are unable to read what I'm saying" perhaps because you're not good at being clear
<6> no
<6> you won't
<4> I already did
<6> huhu
<4> you're wrong
<5> Tom: Maybe you'd be better off attempting to explain what it is that you're attempting to accomplish.
<6> sure you did, champ
<6> anywya
<4> sit down winprog kiddie
<6> the query i gave him a while back is the answer he wanted
<6> so call me kiddie all you want
<6> but i answered him before you even opened your stupid-hole
<6> it's not my fault you don't speak clearly
<4> I speak very clear
<4> learn to read
<6> in fact
<6> "clearly"
<4> www.dictionary.com
<3> Isn't is much simpler to just give the answer? You have written almost 1 page swearing me instead of giving the answer...
<6> learn to speak
<6> Tom-23: i did
<6> Tom-23: quite a while ago
<5> Tom-23: I'd help if I understood what you were trying to do. Your syntax isn't valid.
<6> Tom-23: Darken-'s already scrolled it off-screen in his desperate posturing
<6> [15:12] <6> select * from manual where knowledge like 'how to select';
<3> StoneCyqh: I tried the syntax you gave me and it throwed an error
<6> huhuhuhuh.
<6> huhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuh.
<3> it probably did not identify the table manual
<6> huhuhuhuuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhhuhuhuhuhuhuhhuuhuhuhuhuhu.
<3> you think i should add it to my scheme?
<6> the amount of stupid here is incredible.
<4> StoneCyqh if you're not going to help then stay quiet
<6> i did help.
<6> kindly **** the **** off.
<4> watch how you talk to people here
<6> yeah, you said the same thing other places in which you also don't matter.
<6> your posturing is unimportant. be quiet.
<6> let the noob think without pretending your personal bugbear is a problem.
<4> I don't matter?
<3> StoneCyqh: I made a terrible mistake: I type the sql statement you gave me in notepad! I am so silly!
<3> You think it might work if I will write it on a paper and then press enter?
<6> yes.
<6> that's the best way to write code.
<3> OPS: If I were you I'd run the following: Kick t.* from #SQL t where t.IsNice = false.
<6> huhuhu
<6> okay, have fun listening to the guys who don't even understand your problem, then
<4> Tom-23 your jokes aren't funny
<6> Darken-: pot, kettle
<4> StoneCyqh shutup , kick
<6> Darken-: yes, i suddenly fear you
<4> you should
<6> what i would not give for a way to moon people on irc
<6> why, you're gonna ban me for helping someone when you weren't able?
<3> Sorry Darken-. It is my first time here and I just thought people are here to help each other and not just lough at each other.
<5> The stupidity on IRC never ceases to amaze me.
<6> Tom-23: if you'd just read the example i gave you and apply it, instead of cutting and pasting and shrugging, you'd have your answer
<4> Tom-23 learn to ask a question correctly, yes people get help here, no your jokes aren't remotely funny
<6> dude
<6> his question is fine
<4> StoneCyqh when i want you to respond I will tell you
<6> hur hur wow that's witty
<3> Since StoneCyqh gave me such a good example, I thought I have entered #Clowns
<3> I'll be goof
<3> I'll be good
<6> <3> I'll be angry because that's the best way to get an answer
<3> Ok cut this off.
<3> Hey, no offence...
<3> :)
<4> the term would be "cut this out"
<6> which is like "cut it out"
<6> only wronger
<4> no it's fine
<4> StoneCyqh some people are able to adapt other words into phrases correctly
<4> and then there is you
<6> Darken-: http://googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=%22cut+it+out%22&word2=%22cut+this+out%22
<6> you fail
<4> i don't fail
<6> almost two orders of magnitude
<4> www.dictionary.com look up 'this' and 'it'
<6> yes, because phrases are subject to your nonsense conjugation haggling
<6> in other news, you fail
<4> please go back to school you obviously need to pick up some more cl***
<6> 61 thousand versus 1.6 million
<6> you're just wrong
<3> i said 'cut this off' and not 'cut this out'
<4> it doesn't matter how many matches you find
<4> that's retarded
<4> it is correct grammar
<6> :D sure, phrases have nothing to do with common word orderings
<4> and if you don't understand it then you are at fault for being too ignorant
<6> because 1) it's bad grammar, since there's no direct object, so this can't be used, and 2) cut this off is actually more common
<4> pick up a good english book and go study it for a while
<6> hahaha
<6> yeah
<6> you're failing grammar and syntax on a regular basis, chum
<6> including in the thing you're currently failing to defend
<6> there's no direct object, so you can't use "this"
<4> there is
<6> but we have some lovely parting gifts
<4> the object is of the previous discussion
<4> which defines this
<6> such as an ignore
<6> by the way
<6> that's an indirect object
<6> please learn the difference
<4> going to cry now because you just got owned?
<6> you can't say "this" to an indirect object
<6> you'd say "that" instead
<7> Stone is casuing trouble here now? :)
Return to
#sql
or
Go to some related
logs:
irc nudawn
cam girl123
voiceprint delphi
Error code 000000f4, parameter1 00000003,
delete temproray internet files
the most important province in canada
#hardware
#gentoo
#sql
#stocks
|
|