| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:
<0> either that or english is my third language
<1> dont stand too close to Darken|, he ****s the intelligence out of other people and harnesses their energy
<1> whats your first language, canadian?
<0> up to today he seems to have ****ed only ingorance and arrogance
<2> haha
<2> what is ingorance
<0> it's not called "canadian", it's called french
<2> dfworking he speaks canadian, eh
<1> heh, thats what french people call canadian
<0> YOU are ignorance
<2> Zoroxsta` i can't understand you
<2> please speak in valid english sentences
<1> or valid canadian ones
<2> yes
<2> either or
<2> say something valid
<1> or valide, if it please you
<2> heh
<2> eh
<0> how about some tea ? how about you go kneel in front of your queen ?
<0> how about you go clean Bush boots ?
<1> the queen of america?
<2> dfworking yea
<2> don't you know the queen of america?
<1> yes, she gave me this scarf
<2> nice
<1> and herpes too, for which i use Zoroxsta to control the outbreaks
<2> lol
<1> ITS ALL CONNECTED
<1> LIFE IS A MYSTERY
<2> got an itch? grab a Zoroxsta
<0> you are so funny
<0> let me laugh
<0> please stop, you are too funny
<1> ok
<1> don't want to hurt you or anything
<1> i will console myself with working
<1> work work work
<1> porn
<1> work work work
<3> that's work as well :P
<1> it is if no one sees you
<0> you should first console yourself by getting a life...
<1> i think i have a life
<1> clearly its just a shadow of a fraction of the cool life you no doubt lead though
<1> anyway, i think i'm done being provocative this morning
<1> i shall now return to doing substandard work for a living.
<0> no am a looser, i like to come on IRC and talk bs
<1> its loser
<1> but at least you chose the right place
<1> IRC - bringing losers together since 1994
<0> sorry , my dad's name was not shakespeare like yours...
<1> my dad's name was dennis
<1> or Denis, when we lived in canada
<0> well good for you, i am happy you managed to remember with your little peanut
<1> my wife always says i think with the little peanut and not with the big one
<0> well you must have been a bunch of morons to live Canada... now it's clear
<0> live = leave
<1> well, it was alberta, not quebec, so it wasn't really canada
<2> dfworking he's checking out your package
<1> cause only quebec is true canada
<2> why is he talking about your peanuts like that
<1> i don't know, but its kind of exciting that he IS talking about it
<0> dfworking... just for your information i don't live in Quebec, and never lived ... i come from France...
<2> well eh, good luck on your new found fame to your peanuts then
<2> if you're happy i'm happy
<1> well, at least no one will ever question YOU leaving FRANCE
<2> Zoroxsta` do you wish to buy an extra white flag?
<1> Zoroxsta`, do you like jerry lewis?
<0> well you are from alberta.... you have redneck blood, i understand why you left for your father country
<1> not from alberta
<1> lived there many years ago for a year or something
<2> Zoroxsta` is the worst kind of french
<1> i still have my immigration card
<2> he even surrenders to his own country and leaves
<0> dfworking, well you don't know why i left france so you may stfu
<2> france said you were too much of a coward
<2> and deported you haha
<0> right... you could not even get independance on your own...
<1> clearly in france and canada they don't have this thing called 'banter'
<1> so, rather than have you tell me to shut up instead of playing along, i will do something useful
<1> like add direct launch links to bachelor au listings in the client admin
<2> im so tempted just to have him banned
<2> i might wait until later though
<1> doesn't sound like he's finished entertaining
<2> yea
<0> wow you have 'banning power' .... you are so cool man !
<2> ill let him go on a bit more, and just ban him when i wake up or something
<1> he's white, white people always have the power
<2> :)
<2> night df
<1> late
<0> loser
<1> heh
<0> this is last call for $10....
<1> for what
<0> doing waht i need
<0> http://sql-servers.com/nopaste/?show=180, table structure
<1> i missed it, you and darken were already arguing when i came in
<0> link 6 - 7 tables...
<1> Position (employees can have more than one position). But an employee can not
<1> have a position too. Simple employee.
<1> what does that mean
<0> an employee that has no "position" ie he is not a ceo, cfo.... just an employee
<1> i see
<1> and what is the goal?
<1> and where are you stuck?
<0> just make the strucutre... (link the tables)...
<0> i am not stuck... i am not sure about the relationships and all these things...
<1> what is the application
<0> i want to build upon that so i want to be sure the design is properly done
<0> access
<1> no, i mean what is the purpose of the app
<0> well i will just use the VB behind the forms
<1> and what is an employee's relationship to a document
<0> no it's not an app...
<0> an employee can be related to one or more document, meaning he can "own" them, be responsbile
<1> fine, then i see these tables: employee, document, document_type, policy, programs, subprograms, etc.
<1> document is the one that has all the other FK's
<0> yeap... not a lot of tables..
<0> "FK's" ?
<1> document: doc_ID, doc_Title, doc_EmployeeID, doc_PolicyID, doc_ProgramID, etc..
<1> foreign keys
<1> start with the document table
<1> the rest is incidental
<1> brb
<0> well i did . but it gives me relationships i don't want.... many-to-one, when i want them the other way...
<1> a document can be in many policies, programs, etc?
<1> or its categorized for one each
<0> yeap
<0> well let's say document x can be found in one 'path'
<0> but also in another path
<0> but i would like them to treat differentyl... so technically each document is different, even though it refers to the same document
<0> for example document x in path y could have different attritbute than the one in document z
<1> then you need a 'lookup table'
<0> what is it ?
<1> so, you have you base document table
<0> when you look the values in another table right ?
<1> document: doc_ID, doc_Title, doc_EmployeeID
<1> then you have all your other tables
<0> i did all of this ... it's just does not seem to work for me...
<1> and you have a document_attributes table
<1> document_attributes: doc_ID, policy_ID, program_ID etc
<1> and you can have multiple rows for each doc
<0> no no , when i was talking about "atributes" that was not it
<1> with the document being 'categorized' differently in each row
<1> the document 'path' is based upon the categorization
<0> it was more as reviewed, updated... so in oath x it could have been reviewed but in y not reviewed...
<1> fine, what i'm suggesting still works
<1> its the same document, but has different possible 'paths'
Return to
#sql
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
#online
#stocks
Hablooo
#politics
sexywoman
senn rapist
kutzooi linux
#beginner
sunfru
|
|