| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> HI
<0> Can I ask you about why this error may be accuring? Jul 25 18:19:57 shell sm-mta[11419]: k6PMJq1G011410: to=<wanglinlin2@anhuitelecom.com>, delay=00:00:05, xdelay=00:00:05, mailer=esmtp, pri=120881, relay=mail.anhuitelecom.com. [202.102.194.37], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Input/output error
<0> I was able to send email to earthlink.net ok
<0> I was wondering if there is any way to have sendmail reject mail if the host name is unable to resolve?
<1> which host name is that?
<1> but anyway, doc/op/op.* describes several macros you might want to test, in particular client_resolve.
<0> The chines do not know how to run mail servers.
<1> (provided i've guessed which host name you are talking about)
<1> so?
<0> It makes it hard to communicate them when you dealing with abuse issues
<1> i'm sure they feel the same.
<1> if you don't mean the client's hostname, if you mean the @fqdn then that sendmail should already reject failures unless you have enabled a feature to allow it.
<0> It would be a problem if everyone kept there whois record updated.
<0> stat=Deferred: Input/output error
<1> i'm sure your phone number of 000000000 is found to be useful.
<0> Another bad thing is that a lot of the isp does not have there network configured correctly
<1> i/o error means just that -- probably some issue with the network between you and the peer.
<0> ok
<1> if you use ecn there are places that will fail. likewise if you use timestamps and window scaling. some old hosts just don't grok this stuff.
<0> I chewed out arnin.net
<0> That is ben a very interesting day
<0> Wrong channel.
<2> bom dia!
<3> "Do you think the cause was the comma after www which killed the internet"
<4> at amanh!
<5> Hey, does anyone here have spam-rating system on their email? The new mail server I've set up has been getting caught up as spam on a few servers and I'd like to send a mail and see how I score...
<3> so you are asking whether you can test your spam?:)
<5> not really no
<5> :P
<5> It's not spam
<5> But I fear it is scored as such
<5> I have the reverse DNS and all that
<1> send less awful messages. perhaps plain text.
<5> im doing smtp over ssl
<5> I never could get tls to work right
<6> not reliable as an anti-spam measure really
<6> because it's not end-to-end
<3> Hi msk
<6> hey sub
<5> smtp-auth is better?
<6> same issue
<5> then what should one use?
<3> What problem are you trying to solve?
<6> he wants to know how others rate his spam reputation
<6> and how he can influence it
<5> what do you guys personally use?
<3> Oh
<6> i have inbound spam filters
<6> outbound i just rely on my users not to be spammers
<3> I think twkm made the best suggestion:)
<3> step one would be to fix your reverse DNS
<5> Sorry I got d/c
<3> find your reverse DNS
<3> fix
<5> msk: it's because I send mail from my server via the outside sometimes
<5> relaying is off, unless you auth or are on one of my internal subnects
<5> sub: ok
<5> anyway, thats why I use that kind of setup
<5> makes more sence now?
<5> I'll ask a question I asked in #DNS on freenode
<5> can you guys just point me to the right direction. I want to setup a dns on my box to manage all my registered domains
<5> can I do that with a dynamic ip ?
<3> No but you can ask in #bind
<5> Ok
<5> Where could one get some C help?
<5> #C unable to join channel (need correct key)
<1> the key is extremely difficult to find (/topic) or guess (c).
<1> so, /list #c
Return to
#sendmail
or
Go to some related
logs:
SWCWABE
kingdom of auspiex
#delphi
#politics
munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: wine
#linuxhelp
myfriendshot.com
irrlichts client
#eggtcl
#politics
|
|