| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> hehe yep
<1> i grew up unix wise on freebsd
<2> br1: well, sata is fairly new tchnology
<1> so ill always love the debil
<2> ide is friggin old school
<2> if you **** up an ide implementation nowadays, you are just an idiot
<1> yeah, trying to think if we have had IDE machines with this problem
<2> (meaning hardware vendors)
<2> but sata they tried to rush it to the market, so there are lots of implementations
<1> we had one machine that supposedly had this issue with IDE
<2> sata itself isn't even fully mature yet
<1> tho i was not able to confirm it did or not
<2> hrm
<2> well, i would try cables, maybe try a different kernel if you can
<1> i hint to the devs they have something in their code
<0> hmmm
<2> br1: sorry, bots are laggy today it seems
<1> is it flood protekshun?
<2> yea
<1> i see.. well then.... i will have to get used to only using one line..... doot doot
<2> ;p
<0> lol
<1> ugh, i cant do it, im all about fast and quick on the irc
<2> you're fine
<1> werd
<2> the bots are just a bit laggy i'm guessing
<1> somehow this channel is alot less dumb than i had anticipated
<2> heh
<0> lool
<1> how do u keep it sane?
<2> *shrugs*
<0> banning arseholes ?
<0> lol
<2> that's one way
<1> right on
<0> ;-]
<1> i figured the typical conversations would be beyond me, but i am happy to say most questions in here seem pretty immature to me
<1> maybe i have been workgin harder than i thot
<0> lol
<0> prolly
<0> ive gicen up asking for help
<2> well this isn't exactly an 'official' channel or anything
<0> yeh
<2> mostly just newbs come in and ask questions
<1> i hadnt been "root" for money for like 5 years or so. i get this job here thinking i was going to have to remember alot. turns out, everything is differnet now
<0> i only ask 2-3 people for advice these days
<1> hit the ground running with centos + yum + webmin
<2> eww.
<2> he said the bad word.
<1> now i dont remember where webmin lives on my machines
<1> sorry
<2> rpm -e webmin
<1> like i said, i handt worked for a while
<2> rpm -e webmin
<0> lol
<2> rpm -e webmin
<2> ;[
<1> dont u mean yum remove webmin?
<2> **** yum
<2> rpm -e webmin
<1> **** u
<0> haha
<1> dont ever talk **** about yum again
<0> lol
<2> yum is awful.
<2> apt > *
<1> or i will turn this channel right around and take u home
<2> oh snap!
<1> oh
<0> lool
<1> well, i have yet to not like yum
<1> maybe im not doing enough hard stuff
<0> i still prefer up2date
<2> i just find apt to be more intuitive
<0> until yum catches up
<2> apt-get update updates the local cache
<1> i think "yum search" and "yum install" is pretty easy
<2> apt-get upgrade upgrades all of the packages
<2> br1: yea but there's no way to force it to upgrade the local caches
<1> you mean a local yum server thingy?
<1> like "update this box, then those updates fan out to the other local boxes" ?
<2> no
<2> i mean like the local cache it uses of package information
<1> oh
<1> guess it hasnt been a problem yet for me
<2> *shrugs*
<2> I just think apt is more intuitive
<1> well my kickstart is over
<1> you work on getting my thumbdrive to be bootable and seen as disk #1 of centos 4, so i can kick from it
<3> i need some help with Fedora Core 5 and Java
<3> i have jre-1)5_0_07-linux.i586.rpm
<3> but when i go to install it, it says package jre-1.5.0_07-fcs is already installed.
<3> but typing 'which java' adn/or just java gives an error as if java isn't installed.
<3> AND...the best part
<3> syste|preferences|java tells me v1.5.0 of teh Java 2 platform SE is installed
<4> Guys I have a problem with some packetloss, where packets leaving one interface are meant to then p*** through a router and reach another interface. I've done a tcpdump on both interfaces and I can see packets leaving the interface but only some of the packets reach the other interface. The interface on the router is most likely set to full duplex and my attached interface is half duplex causing a duplex mismatch. I need to fix this, though i
<4> f this was the problem i'd still expect the collisions to be retransmitted and received at the other end? Any idea guys?
<5> svc: warning: unable to control /service/pure-ftpd/: file does not exist any1 know why i would be getting this error
<6> just curious, is fedora like redhat ripoff or just hiearchy and RPM compatible ?
<7> well
<7> fc is closest to beta version as you can get
<8> osearth: http://fedora.redhat.com/about/history/
<6> ugh ok thx
<8> np
<6> looks like fedora is more server or less packages
<6> last linux i ran was Colgate
<6> i think i got took by the xor adm named worm
<7> fedora core will install desktop by default
<6> ahh maybe that's why these packages expect xinetd
<6> it's looking like fedora is a poor OS for a colocated box
<7> really depends on your needs
<7> each distro has its pro's and con's
<9> hi.
<9> for the payment modules I use https on my site, but i see on the new host the https shows absolute urls, anyway to fix this ?
<9> so instead of https://sslhost.com/mydomain/contact.php it shows mydomain/contact.php on a link.
<7> what are you talking about?
<7> what payment modules
<7> you probably want #php
<9> well actually I can't see the images over there
<9> they all appear as absolute, same with links..
<7> huh?
<9> when you open the non-ssl website it is fine, but when opened from the https site, the site's url and images dont appear right.
<9> the images dont appear and the links point to https://domain.com/**
<9> instead of pointing to https:/sslhost.com/domain/
<7> in WHAT?
<7> what the **** are you trying to do
<9> :)
<9> you are not getting me, sorry .
<7> no not at all
<7> [10:14] <9> hi.
<7> [10:15] <9> for the payment modules I use https on my site, but i see on the new host the https shows absolute urls, anyway to fix this ?
<7> what payment module?
<9> yeh maybe i am using wrong terms or whatever.
<9> ok let me revise :)
<9> my website works fine when opened with non-ssl i.e http.
<7> your website that is being ran by apache and PHP4/5?
<9> the host has told me to access my site's https as : https://sslhost.com/mydomain.com/
<9> yeh.
<9> so when someone accesses the site from https://sslhost.com/mydomain.com/ their links should be relative
<7> im still asking, what payemnt are you talking about?
<7> module
<9> forget about payment module :)
<9> such as https://sslhost.com/mydomain.com/contact.php
<9> but that appears as https://mydomain.com/contact.php which is an invalid ssl url
<9> so i wanted to know if there's some way to fix this to have these links point relativeliy instead of absolute.
<9> guess i can't express it the right way :(
<10> :/
<0> dr-lol should know better znx
<10> OmegaEvil: indeed :)
<0> hehe
Return to
#redhat
or
Go to some related
logs:
#beginner
create would set mdadm mode to create set to manage
#hardware
#stocks
sundae redog
#windowsxp
#politics
#mirc
pbug irc
Gentoo terminal encoding utf-8 iso
|
|