| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> can anyone help me set up a raid?
<1> Raid set up anyone, help needed?
<2> billybong?
<0> yes?
<2> from undernet?
<0> no
<2> ok
<1> fdisk help
<3> I'm thinking of a program that does most of what lsof does, but this is more lightweight and comes with most distributions. I cannot think of the name. What is it?
<3> fstat idiots!
<4> #quake4all.c 1
<4> #quake4all 1 join/leave
<4> #lfl.priv 1
<4> #lfl 1
<4> #bitboys 1
<4> #geeksecurit 1
<4> #salarakkaat 1
<4> #salakanava 1
<4> #ladatraxu 1
<4> #existi.mode 1
<4> #monttu2 1
<4> ER SORRY
<5> lol
<5> dumb
<4> DCC SEND "YOURMOM" 0 0 0 0
<6> Is there an easy way to install the redhat development packages rather than figure out what rpms are needed?
<7> yum groupinstall "Development Tools"
<8> hey
<7> sup
<8> in httpd.conf, what else do i need besides a second listening port?
<8> i want both ports to use the default htdocs folder
<8> but only port 80 is, port 8080 wont
<7> interesting, i havent done that before...my thought is that youd need to run a second copy of httpd with a seperate httpd.conf.
<7> i could be very wrong.
<8> nah
<8> all over the net says you can have multiple "Listen" directives
<7> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/examples.html
<7> yes.
<7> im sure youve seen that URL then.
<8> yeah
<8> ERROR
<8> The requested URL could not be retrieved
<8> oh wait
<7> For example, to make the server accept connections on both port 80 and port 8000, use:
<7> Listen 80
<7> Listen 8000
<8> i think dans guardian is rnning on that port now
<7> judging by that, something else is broke
<7> if you already have listen 8080
<8> tahts what it is
<8> heh
<7> tell me!
<8> i just remembered as i pasted the error that i have dansguardian running on the same port
<7> roger that.
<7> should have lots of errors in error_log too!
<8> well, i got something in my browser, so i felt like it was running ;)
<8> ****
<8> now its not working
<7> change the secondary listen port to something weird like 1234
<7> check syslog and error_log
<8> i get some random sql messages that are ignorable
<8> nothing about not creating listening socket
<7> weird
<7> what does apachectl configtest say
<8> af-mail ~ # /etc/init.d/apache2 configtest
<8> * Checking Apache Configuration ... [ ok ]
<7> did you change the secondary listen port to something else
<7> is it iptables screwing you
<8> no iptables
<8> or no rules set at least
<7> is it running ?
<8> apche is yes
<7> i meant iptables
<8> still connecting on port 80
<8> it is, but allow all rule only
<8> i cant even telnet locally
<7> what the hell else is broke
<7> we need more verbose logging
<7> i say you shut apache down, and run it in the foreground, like httpd -c /whatever/httpd.conf
<8> heh
<8> jesus
<8> no more me working on somethiing for 9 straight hours
<8> i was editing the wrong httpd.conf
<7> im going to kill you.
<8> thats what happens when you spend all day hacking a php website to look like you want it to
<7> i actually almost asked you which apachectl you were running
<7> sigh
<7> brrb
<8> but i get wrong url now
<8> but ill figure it out later
<8> so apache is running now
<8> [Sun Mar 05 22:53:32 2006] [error] [client 172.16.1.217] File does not exist: /usr/htdocs
<9> yea, apache is set to /usr/htdocs as DocumentRoot, but that dir deosn't exist
<9> or one of your vhosts is
<9> so, anyone know the "appropriate" way to install php5.x on RHEL4 would be? Should I use some CentOS RPMs, or.. ?
<9> I'm very unfarmiliar with redhat's package management system.
<10> hi
<11> falz
<9> yes.
<11> use system-config-packages
<9> x11 based, looks like
<9> I guess I could.. walk to the server.
<9> hmm, that works, but has no configuration as to where it's finding its package info. looks like it's all the standard RHEL 4.x stuff (php 4.3.9, etc).
<9> so, it looks like the only way to use rpm's to upgrade to any packages that aren't native to RHEL is to use fedora packages? This seems that its incredible amount of dependencies essentially changes the server over to fedora. Any other solutions other than simply to NOT use package management and just compile?
<11> apt-rpm
<11> google dagwiers
<9> ooh, someone ported apt?
<11> apt-rpm is a bit shaky though
<11> hasnt been working latley for me
<9> hmm
<9> ill check it out nonetheless
<11> you find it?
<9> yea, but it looks woefully out of date. at least, their website is.
<9> can't find a proper way to set its sources file (xml). its set for RH8 by default
<11> there is an apt-rpm for rhel4
<11> apt-0.5.15lorg2-0.20060301.2.el4.test.i386.rpmSun 05 Mar 20067 kBRed Hat EL 4 - i386
<11> apt-0.5.15lorg2-0.20060301.2.el4.test.x86_64.rpmSun 05 Mar 20060 kBRed Hat EL 4 - x86_64
<9> just found that.. http://laiskiainen.org/apt/testing/
<11> http://dag.wieers.com/packages/apt/
<9> ah, that's better. the one I had found was different, and not like the normal apt
<9> the issue seems to be that no one has packages for php5 for RHEL, which is obvious since EL is supposed to be "stable". the way that RPM dependencies themselves seems to be the issue- if I choose a FC4 php5 install, its dependencies will effectively convert most/all of my system to fedora.
<2> like going from sarge to etch
<9> hmm I think I should just convince these people to ditch RH
<2> hrm, kinda expensive now, isnt it?
<9> less expensive then them paying me to fix this crappy server.
<9> install freebsd, install packages required, done in 2hours.
<9> </rant>
<2> lol
<9> I've just not been in the linux world for years, so I'm now redhat/rpm-dumb
<2> well, i was referring to the possible cost of rh now and dumping it
<9> yea, I don't know how much they paid for RHEL.
<2> could be a lot
<9> ****s to be them!
<2> heh
<9> they probably shouldn't buy it if they require php5.
<2> probably a good point, however, i would think that rhel 5 would be due this fall
<2> wasnt rhel 4 released in feb last year?
<9> well, that will always be a problem with RHEL. if they release every 18 months, and this company requires to be up to date as far as php goes, they'll always be playing catchup
<9> not sure. prolly :)
<2> true
<9> well, php's just going on from source, and that's it. copying the RPM's ./configure line as much as I can will work fine
<2> how important is it to be running bleeding edge?
<9> dunno. they said they require php5, so their devs must be using some feature of it
<2> sounds like a choice they will have to makee
<2> make
<9> I should.. install freebsd, write a script that replaces uname to say something redhat-ey, and be done :)
<9> I should also stop complaining about it in this rh channel.
<5> falz, tell them to use whitebox linux
<5> its the same as rhel
<9> and same/similar to centos?
<5> similar
Return to
#redhat
or
Go to some related
logs:
#computers
u know u r italian jokes
#networking
#computers
#delphi
#dreamweaver
#beginner
#winxp
#beginner
#goal
|
|