| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> freebsd > gentoo
<1> Volatile: read it
<2> yes
<2> i see
<2> but i still do not understand
<2> it doesn't make much sense
<2> why does the text turn purple when you scroll over it
<2> this site is gay
<2> :(
<2> ohhh
<2> the guy's japanese
<2> nm.
<2> explains a lot.
<3> lap1, and you don't keep your sources?
<3> lol
<3> :(
<2> ean, THOSE things should perform REALLY well, and gentoo is just the thing that does that..."
<2> (except for when you do a global update)
<2> (oops!)
<0> yeah, on my dev server somewhere
<0> didn't you find it on the web thought ?
<0> you'll probably get a later version
<0> s/thought/though/
<0> argh, i'm such a geek
<2> wowz
<2> 92.168.1.101:/home/bigvideos on /ser
<2> im scared to see whats there
<2> TEE
<3> do some google magic for me
<3> please!
<3> lol
<0> now THAT'S lazy
<0> :P
<3> man
<3> you've found it once :/
<3> ill paypal you a dollar
<3> lol
<0> rofl
<3> im kind of skeptic on this one i did find because it uses vuserinfo to find the path to the mailbox
<3> and i have a lot of forwards for domains
<3> so im worried it will break
<0> what do you mean ?
<0> the vuserinfo in simscan is there to find the user's mailbox and place the SPAM in a SPAM folder
<2> hahahahahha
<2> this is a great quote actualluy
<2> a guy moving from mandrake to gentoo
<2> "I have used Mandrake as my server OS, desktop, and laptop OS for years now (since 6.x if i rememeber correctly). I really like the some features that Mandrake has (the Control Center, drake, etc..). But I have started using Gentoo, and now i'm in love again. The last Mandrake install 8.2 was just.....to easy, everything worked off the bat. With Gentoo you have to work a lot at the beginning and have a lot more control."
<2> hahahahha
<2> 'it was too easy! it just worked!'
<2> hhahah
<2> i would have loved to see him install NetBSD
<2> or FreeBSD pre v2
<0> or OpenBSD
<0> hd geomtry anyone
<3> lap1, so if it uses vuserinfo to find the mailbox to place the spam in the spam folder and mail gets sent to a forward like jew@nigga.net -> nigga-jew, you don't think it would break would you
<3> if it came to jew@nigga.net lol
<0> ofcourse not
<3> and jew was the forward
<0> because it follows the forward
<3> ok cool
<0> dummy
<3> lol
<3> well im scared
<3> i got like 5000 mailboxes
<2> er
<0> you never played with the chkuser patch now did you ?
<2> OpenBSD wasnt around back then
<2> ;P
<2> i meant pre any GUI
<3> na
<3> why
<2> what is with the racist domains and usernames?
<0> cel: how come you are in charge of 5000 mailboxes man ? :)
<3> because i set it up
<3> lol
<3> im just looking for a better way to fight the damn spam
<3> other than sa
<3> sick of perl
<0> well, let me ask you this
<0> where does your current SPAM go ?
<3> tagged and goes to new/
<2> !sare
<4> http://www.rulesemporium.com/ - Spam******in Rules Emporium
<2> problem solved.
<2> dont even p*** on the message
<2> if it's marked as spam
<2> reject it during the SMTP session
<0> that's just insane in production environment
<0> what if SA is wrong ?
<5> well, and then pray for no false positives
<2> too ****ing bad?
<0> lol
<2> they get a bounce message
<2> and the person who was bothering you about viagra
<2> can re-send the ****ing message
<3> heh
<5> unless it asnt about viagra
<2> ive never had ANYONE complain about false positive
<5> and it got scored bad simply because sa is blind
<0> not really..the SARE rules are messed up too..and I was having tons of FP with them
<2> fix them
<5> look, being cheap is fine
<2> or
<5> and free stuff is all fine if youre unwilling to spend any money
<2> tell your users to enable their bayes filters
<2> in their email client
<5> and you dont mind managing an extra item
<2> nah
<2> email users are abusive
<2> cut them no slack
<5> fine
<0> +, loading 1000 rules in SA makes your box even slower
<2> they send 50 meg attachments
<2> they spam
<5> but i dont have time to manage another thing like SA
<2> so dont?
<2> base SA
<2> with syntax checking
<2> tell them to fix their email client
<0> i find that dspam is 100x faster
<5> doesnt work right
<5> i proved that in chico
<0> and I have no fp's at all
<2> works for me.
<5> then i discovered that for some bucks
<5> i got flawless filtering
<5> got a spiffy user quarantine
<2> which system is that?
<5> the vendors automated reputation scoring manages everything for me
<0> barracuda
<0> :D
<5> ciphertrust
<5> ironmail
<5> best mail "toy" i ever found
<0> man, I heard ironmail ****s big time
<2> lewl
<5> then you were talking to a one-legged retard
<5> SA isnt bad, by any means
<5> dont think im sayin that
<5> i just dont care to have a system i have to add to my list of "**** to manage"
<5> and when youve got 10k+ users and have to deal with compliance
<5> sa is a nightmare
<0> how much was the ironmail stuff ?
<5> i dunno, depends on your real message volume
<2> laugh
<5> we got 2 for under $50k
<0> :)
<2> they dont even list who their virus vendor is
<2> they just say
<2> 'multiple companies'
<5> authentium and mcafee
Return to
#qmail
or
Go to some related
logs:
#directx
#beginner
#beginner
#winxp
getbackbuffer remotely
#red
#politics
#computers
AKspud
#hardware
|
|