@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet


Comments:

<0> if only someone had a nice freebsd+qmail+vpopmail+TMDA+TLS/SSL somewhere. (without needing to install a ton of perl modules)
<0> err... s/ somewhere/ howto somewhere/
<1> Kaz__: my guide on http://bsdguides.org/ could help you underway to your target
<1> and the rest you'd have to figure out yourself :P
<2> x
<2> i got a q for u
<2> if u got a sec
<1> sure
<2> can we do it in a msg
<1> sure
<3> heh 'do it'
<2> something terrible just happened to me
<2> i was watching a movie, and i looked away for a second...looked back at the tv, and i realized i missed a part that i wanted to see



<2> and u know what popped into my head ?
<2> cd ../
<2> :{
<4> Anyone got a tip for a mail stress testing software?
<5> perl script should do the trick
<4> Got an idea about where i could find one that does it ?
<4> Not any good at perl :/
<5> takes but a minute to write something
<6> kitchen do you still play wow ?
<2> wowowowowowo
<2> kitchen
<2> send alrm to qmailsend
<7> Anyone know if there is a place where i can limit spam******in / qmail-scanner to not run more than ex 10 scans at a time ?
<2> 10 scand ?
<7> yeah
<2> whats the problem
<7> im stress testing it now, and aprox 100 scans is slowing it down
<7> spam******in / f-prot
<2> well
<2> you can run spamd with an argument that limits the # of processes
<2> you can limit the number of smtp connectiosn
<2> that could do it too
<7> Hmm maybe increasing the ram on the server would help, its a dual xeon 3.2ghz, but only 512meg ram
<7> ah i had already limited it to 5 spamd's, think i'll try to increase it to 25 and see how it copes with that
<7> hoho 7 in load
<7> 8
<2> how can there be so much load
<2> thats insane
<7> max 25 spamd's at a time
<7> running with fprot
<7> sending 10.000 mails with attachment.zip
<2> gotcha
<2> thats quite a bit of mail! :)
<7> well.. we're converting from exchange
<7> and some days ago, we had done it.. fired it up..worked like a charm.. then suddenly... CRASH
<7> and i managed to remove 260 mails to the users.. so this time... no ****ups
<2> i think, if you run spamd out of daemontools, you can use softlimit to limit the memory usage
<2> im still surprsed at the load tho
<2> also, 512 ram isnt enough for a laptop running winxp these days, bro
<7> using 450meg ram and 300meg swap
<2> do you have custom spam******in rules loaded in ?
<7> when i got this baby up and running full time, we gonna replace it with a quad xeon 3.2 with 2gig ram
<7> yeah
<2> like rulesdujour ?
<7> Yup
<2> ok those are the offender
<2> did you choose the "BLACKLIST" ruleset.
<7> Lets see :P
<7> 56 .cf's :D



<7> wisely chosen
<7> havent stopped any regular mail yet
<7> checking for porn and viagra
<2> well
<2> whered you get those cf's from
<7> from the rules de jour site
<2> k
<2> they **** up ram like crazy
<7> yeah, saw that
<7> suddenly i was out of ram and started digging hard into my swap
<2> nyeap
<7> doing a while true loop with telnetting to 110 and making a login and a list in a folder with 5000 mails now
<7> stress testing is fun :)
<7> while my boss is running an external smtp bomber on the account
<7> over gbit lan
<2> how much traffic is typical of your mail ?
<7> well, its aprox 40 private customers and a few companies
<7> aprox 7-800mails a day
<7> so the hardware and stress test is overkill
<2> 800 mails/day ??
<7> but nice to know it can handle more
<7> yeah
<2> i do at least 800 mails per minute
<7> they send a LOT of mail
<7> i dont got a lot of clients :P
<2> you can do 800 mails per day on a 386.
<7> with fprot/spam******in scans?
<2> no
<2> but still
<2> what youre doing is crazy
<7> we just got the hardware because its cool
<2> word
<7> Calculating: ran 47628 pop3 logins in 8minutes exactly, that equals 99.225 logins pr sec
<7> all of the logins did a LIST in the account, where it was 5.000 mails
<7> this is fun :>
<2> can i see your scripts ?
<7> sure, its simple ****
<7> while true do ./ dopoplogins.sh done
<7> and in dopoplogins i got; telnet 127.0.0.1 110 << EOF
<7> login user@blabla.com
<7> p*** blabla
<7> list
<7> logout
<7> EOF
<7> and a echo "blabla" >> test-list.txt
<7> simple, aint exactly what i would get when realtime users log in but
<8> 800 a day makes all servers yawn :)
<8> better put xen of esx on that quad box you're going to use
<7> xen of esx?
<7> *stupid*
<8> who's stupid ?
<7> im stupid
<7> what do you mean by xen of esx ?
<8> of=or obviously
<8> they are virtualisation programs
<7> ah ok
<7> well its just gonna run a couple of apache's, and qmail /vpopmail
<7> Originally we was going to install openmosix on the boxes.. but we didnt because of the lacking openmosix support in 2.6
<7> and 2.4 was not an option because of some of our boxes had sata on them


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #qmail
or
Go to some related logs:

#windows
Site-AXX
#winxp
#winxp
Cyberwapper
#redhat
#firebird
#politics
#politics
irc-chat-logs.com



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes