| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2
Comments:
<0> i wouldnt know, my box got fried today
<1> anyone able to help me to try determine the originator of an email from the headers?
<0> define originator
<0> and ***uming it wasnt a zombie
<0> i think you should just give up
<0> if it beat your spamfilter, it beat your spam filter
<0> and if youre some kinda of sick, twisted stalker, i dont wanna help either
<1> http://pastebin.com/534685
<1> its spam
<1> x.com is my domain, all the rest is left unchanged
<0> Received: from 68-115-179-205.dhcp.rnrp.nc.charter.com
<0> chances are you got spammed by a zombie
<1> so when i read the received lines, since there are 3 of them i read top to bottom or bottom to top?
<0> the chain starts at the bottom
<0> ends at the top
<1> then wouldn't this be the originator?
<1> Received: from 69.50.170.146
<1> line #8
<0> it could be
<0> someone used squirrelmail to send mail to a dhcp'd address
<0> which sent it to you, tho?
<0> like i said, zombie
<1> annoying thing is that it was sent to me, using my email as the return email
<0> heh, welcome to spamland
<1> so more importantly than determining where it came from i guess is finding a way to block emails like that without blocking my own domains emails
<0> where headers are mostly fake
<0> thats why i point out the charter.com address
<0> thats what your mailserver got a connection from
<0> theres absolutely no way an MX record points at that address
<0> so the bottom most header can be discredited
<1> is there something i can do to block these types of emails or no?
<1> these types meaning emails that spoof the return path as my own domain's email address
<0> well, there are plenty of anti-spam products out there
<1> currently employing spam******in on the server
<0> just depends how much youre willing to spend and how much management time you have
<1> thanks for the info kaleido, im off for now
<2> hi
<3> hola
<2> sup bro
<3> notta much.. same **** diff toilet
<4> shouldn't it be different **** same toilet?
<2> TERLIT
<4> do you know anything about cameras?
<4> sony cybershot DCS-W5 vs. Kodak Easyshare C3400
<2> uh
<2> is it running qmail.exe ?
<4> maybe
<2> hrmph
<2> perhaps then
<4> I'm not sure which "it" you're talking about
<2> the kodak.
<4> no, but the sony does
<2> interesting
<4> which one is better
<2> no idea
<4> stop toying with my emotions
<2> :{
<4> better check that guy's pockets
<2> ROGUE SIX
<4> DO YOU LICK ****S PRIVATE PYLE
<5> where is kichen
<6> hey, i've noticed a load of deferral's due to somebody spamming, i can't actually work out through the logs who exactly it is, is there a place in the queue where deferrals go for reprocessing?
<7> hey
<7> i installed qmail with Qinstall1-2 and pop3 dont work i think
<7> idon't get error
<2> op me
<8> woo!
<9> yayayayayayayay
<8> if i were opped
<8> the first thing i would do is take this feeble chan and rename it sendmail.exe.
<10> haha
<4> heh
<4> that shouldn't be too hard
<4> you just have to kick everyone out and then force them to join the new channel
<11> What can be wrong when i have almost no connectivity to my server but my pop3 is still going verry slowly
<12> anyone aware if nerd.dk is experiencing an outage or DoS or something?
<4> nerd.dk?
<0> i keep close tabs on nerd.dk
<11> anybody any idea about my problem?
<11> :-)
<4> hehe, well when a site gets DoS'd the first thing I think to myself is, "I better check with those #qmail guys..."
<12> hey smart***
<11> What can be wrong when i have almost no connectivity to my server but my pop3 is still going verry slowly
<0> mrluring: that question doesnt make any sense
<0> if you have almost no connectivity, then obviously pop3 will be very slow
<12> http://countries.nerd.dk ... last updated July 31, 2004 haha
<0> why the box has almost no connectivity is anyones guess
<11> i have 4 users connection to pop3
<11> worked fine 1hour ago
<11> now its takeing 2minutes to check mail
<11> ;)
<13> hello. im using the dotdeb.org install of qmail and vchkpw and such on debian sarge. its recieveing mail for the differnet domains, but i can't authenticate to get any mail out. error from a telnet session is that it can't open config file. don't know which one its trying to open. can anyone lend a hand?
<8> who uses solaris
<8> pepsis, look at your logs
<8> dont ask me where they are
<13> aic : not looking for you to hold my hand, just point me in the right direction. if you don't know about this situation, then thanks for your conversation. if you do know about this situation, please help. :) if you can't help, please be quiet so someone else might be able to. :)
<0> ive used solaris
<0> 9 and 10, anyways
<8> pepsis
<8> try answering my question, rather than setting a bunch of rules and restrictions on me
<8> thanks
<8> lol
<9> pepsis: we dont maintain .deb packages. you'd be better off asking the maintainer of this package
<13> aic, i dont use solaris. figured you would know that by the "and such on debian sarge." :)
<13> ok...no prob.
<8> um
<9> if that doesnt help you, just install from source
<8> i was asking everyone in the chan about solaris but...
<8> i figured out my issue already there
<8> fyi, solaris is ****
<9> when it comes to qmail, installing from source is always preferred
<13> good for you aic. :)
<8> did you check your logs yet
<13> trying to find out where this package is dumping them. i am getting info about messages coming in via SMTP but nothing about authentication attempts
<8> i tellu what
<8> its in /var/log
<8> somewher in there
<9> maillog
<9> ;)
<13> /var/log/mail.log doesn't say anything except its a failed attempt, nothing about what files its complainging about
<9> everybody in here would suggest installing qmail from lifewithqmail.org and after that installing vpopmail from source
<13> then i think i have my work cut out for me...no date for me tonight. :(
<14> how much ram would you need to have on a linux box to support around 300-500 users using imap or pop3 access?
<14> running qmail of course
<9> not much
<9> a bit more than not much in the imap4 case
<11> how do i change softlimit on qmail-pop3 ?
<0> the run file
<0> /service/qmail-pop3d/run
<11> can the softlimit be the reason for my pop3 to use 30sec before it accept the connection
<0> doubtful, but in your tcpserver settings, youre probly using flags that tell it to set variables and do hostname lookups and such
<0> if you are, remove those flags
<11> exec tcpserver -H -R -v -c100 0 110 qmail-popup mail01.temp.no \
<11> /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1
<0> http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html
<11> is something wrong there ?
<3> kal-el: so where you been these last few years?
<7> i can send message but i cant get message
<7> all dns/mx records are right
<0> klepto: workin, playin
<0> i dont get much time to really irc anymore aside from when im at my desk
<7> Feb 2 12:34:24 cs1 vm-pop3d[3064]: Incoming connection opened
<7> Feb 2 12:34:34 cs1 vm-pop3d[3064]: Quitting on signal: 2
<7> is there something wrong with pop3?
<3> ahh
<7> kaleido: how to fix it?
<0> toof: i dunno what that signal indicates, i dont use vpop for anything
<15> hah!
Return to
#qmail
or
Go to some related
logs:
#nhl
synaptic reset failed debian
#politics
#worldcup
usmc.mil email
#beginner
#freebsd
#linuxhelp
#hardware
thongbattle
|
|