| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> sup people.
<1> yeh
<2> why is from foo import bar working, but not from foo.bar import bar?
<2> or what's the difference?
<3> foo has to be a module
<3> if foo.bar is a module, it should work
<3> it's a little weird, but sometimes foo.bar is a module (you can import it) and sometimes it isn't
<2> foo.bar has an __init__.py and it has several cl***es defined in it
<3> then I have no idea
<2> heh.. i need to read more
<4> you'll have to be clearer about what your setup is
<4> if foo is a package (directory which contains __init__.py) and bar is a module inside it (bar.py inside foo directory), then from foo import bar is correct
<4> from foo.bar import bar is incorrect]
<4> from foo.bar import bar tries to import a module bar from a package foo.bar
<4> i.e., the thing you're importing is foo.bar.bar
<4> that would correspond to foo/bar/bar.py
<2> thanks, xihr (as usual)
<4> sure
<2> one more thing
<2> which is preferred: cursor.fetchall()[0][0] or return [i[0] for i in cursor.fetchall()]?
<2> or is it 6 of 12... half a dozen of another
<3> I don't think those do the same thing
<4> well those don't do the same thing
<2> hmm
<2> well, it doesn't matter then
<2> haha
<4> if A is a sequence of sequences, then A[0][0] is the first element of the first sequence
<4> [i[0] for i in A] is a list of the first elements of each seqeuence
<2> ohhh... but if there's only going to be one item, then i guess the former should suffice
<4> yes
<4> in that case they still won't be the same, though; one will be an element, and the other will be a list (with only one element)
<3> xihr: do you mind at all if I ask you something privately?
<4> why
<3> because it's not related to python
<4> sure
<3> and I think I'd just annoy everyone else
<2> ok, i have models/RT.py (which has def _module_get_foo() and cl*** Cars), models/__init__.py (which just has __all__ = ['RT']). now i need access RT.Cars and RT._module_get_foo... so how would i do this? from models/RT import Cars; from models import RT?
<4> from models.RT import Cars, _module_get_foo
<2> ok... i don't know why namespaces are confusing me
<2> i got it now
<2> thanks, xihr
<4> sure
<4> when you use from M import X, M is always a package/module, and X is a thing inside it
<2> so package = directory, module = python file, X = cl***/def/...
<2> ?
<4> yep
<2> ok, night
<5> I wonder if anyone has made a native cl*** for real numbers.
<6> hi
<6> i'm looking for a way to access a method from its body
<6> is that even possible?
<5> "self.methodname()"
<7> howdy hund
<5> Hello Joe.
<5> Yay.
<7> Woof.
<5> Yay, I finally groked the concept of zero-knowledge protocols.
<5> Plser.
<5> #wrong
<7> Bratwurst.
<7> #wrong
<5> SgtUnix: Did you eat it?
<7> hund: I luv bratwursts.
<5> SgtUnix: http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/okonomi/article1261071.ece
<5> :D:D:D
<5> (Not English)
<7> hund: oh my :)
<5> Oh yes.
<7> BI ranks higher than NHH these days though, I heard.
<7> I do all ***ignments in TeX nowadays, I'm hooked.
<4> heh
<4> just have to get over the hump
Return to
#python
or
Go to some related
logs:
#worldcup
caiwhiqk
#computers
#sql
#computers
#worldcup
bart pe + c0000221 unkown had error
+torchwood +uue
calandar layout for indesign
#freebsd
|
|